Research in Higher Education

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 107–125 | Cite as

The Effects of Liberal Arts Experiences on Liberal Arts Outcomes

  • Tricia A. Seifert
  • Kathleen M. Goodman
  • Nathan Lindsay
  • James D. Jorgensen
  • Gregory C. Wolniak
  • Ernest T. Pascarella
  • Charles Blaich
Article

Abstract

Despite scholars’ praise of liberal arts education as a model form, very little research has examined the actual impact of liberal arts education on learning outcomes. The elaborate rhetoric and anecdotal support, long used to advance liberal arts education as the premier type of education with value for all, is no longer sufficient. The practices and conditions that lead to outcomes of a liberally educated student remain an empirical black box. Guided by the work of Pascarella et al. [2005, Liberal arts colleges and liberal arts education: New evidence on impacts. ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(3)], this study examined the extent to which an institutional ethos, that values student–student and student–faculty interaction within a supportive environment characterized by high expectations for developing the intellectual arts, manifests in the lived experiences of students and predicts the development of outcomes theoretically associated with the liberal arts. Specifically, we investigated the construct and predictive validity of the liberal arts experience scale relative to liberal arts outcomes. Using data from the first phase of the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education, net of student background characteristics and institution attended, we found liberal arts experiences had a positive effect on four of six liberal arts outcomes, including intercultural effectiveness, inclination to inquire and lifelong learning, well-being, and leadership.

Keywords

Liberal arts education Learning outcomes Liberal arts Liberally educated 

References

  1. American Association for Liberal Education (2003). The academy’s education standards. Retrieved April 19, 2005 from http://www.aale.org/highered/edstand.htm.
  2. Aristotle (350 B.C.E.). Politics, book eight. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. Retrieved September 24, 2007 from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/politics.8.eight.html.
  3. Association of American Colleges & Universities (1998, October). Statement on liberal learning. Retrieved November 5, 2003, from http://www.aacu-edu.org/About/liberal_learning.cfm.
  4. Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) (2002). Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. Retrieved April 29, 2006 from http://www.greaterexpectations.org/.
  5. Astin A. (1993). What matters in college? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Astin, A. W. (2000). How the liberal arts college affects students. In S. Koblik & S. Graubard (Eds.), Distinctly American: The residential liberal arts colleges. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Blaich, C., Bost, A., Chan, E., & Lynch, R. (2004). Defining liberal arts education. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved September 24, 2007 from http://www.wabash.edu/cila/docs/DefLibArtEdFinal.pdf.
  8. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Center of Inquiry in the Liberal Arts at Wabash College (2006). Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education. Retrieved on April 29, 2006 from http://www.liberalarts.wabash.edu/nationalstudy.
  10. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3–7.Google Scholar
  11. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1991). Applying the seven principles for good practice in higher education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1991(47), 1–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1999). Development and adaptations of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1999(80), 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chickering, A., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Cruce, T., Wolniak, G. C., Seifert, T. A., Pascarella, E. T., & Blaich, C. (2006). Impacts of good practices on cognitive development, learning orientations, and graduate degree plans during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 47(4), 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farrell, E. F., & Van Der Werf, M. (2007). Playing the rankings game. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(38), A11.Google Scholar
  17. Hammer, M. R., & Bennett, M. J. (2001). The intercultural development inventory (IDI) manual. Portland: Intercultural Communication Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Higher Education Research Institute (1996). Social change model of leadership development. Los Angeles: UCLA.Google Scholar
  19. King, P., Kendall Brown, M., Lindsay, N., & VanHecke, J. (in press). Liberal arts student learning outcomes: An integrated perspective. About Campus.Google Scholar
  20. Kitchener, K. S, Wood, P. K., & Jensen, L. (in preparation). Individual differences in gains in reflective judgment and their relationship to college experiences.Google Scholar
  21. Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 135–148.Google Scholar
  22. Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Study of Student Engagement. Change, 33(3), 10–17, 66.Google Scholar
  23. Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2), 24–32.Google Scholar
  24. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Kuh, G. D., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates (1991). Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and personal development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Matthews, A. (1997). Bright college years: Inside the American college campus today. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  27. Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Pascarella, E. T. (2006). How college affects students: Ten directions for future research. Journal of College Student Development, 47(5), 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students: Vol. 2. A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  31. Pascarella, E., Wolniak, G., Cruce, T., & Blaich, C. (2004). Do liberal arts colleges really foster good practices in undergraduate education? Journal of College Student Development, 45(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pascarella, E., Wolniak, G., Seifert, T., Cruce, T., & Blaich, C. (2005). Liberal arts colleges and liberal arts education: New evidence on impacts. ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(3).Google Scholar
  33. Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a new instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being visited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  37. Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1996). Students’ out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 37(2), 149–162.Google Scholar
  38. Turner F. M. (Ed.) (1996). The idea of the university, John Henry Newman. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tyree, T. M. (1998). Designing an instrument to measure the socially responsible leadership using the social change model of leadership development. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(06), 1945.Google Scholar
  40. U.S. Department of Education (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Retrieved May 21, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/final-report.pdf.
  41. Wood, P. K., Kitchener, K. S., & Jensen, L. (2002). Considerations in the design, evaluation of a paper-and-pencil measure of reflective thinking. In B. Hofer & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tricia A. Seifert
    • 1
  • Kathleen M. Goodman
    • 1
  • Nathan Lindsay
    • 2
  • James D. Jorgensen
    • 1
  • Gregory C. Wolniak
    • 3
  • Ernest T. Pascarella
    • 1
  • Charles Blaich
    • 4
  1. 1.N491 Lindquist CenterThe University of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.The University of North Carolina WilmingtonWilmingtonUSA
  3. 3.National Opinion Research Center at the University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  4. 4.The Center of Inquiry in the Liberal Arts at Wabash CollegeCrawfordsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations