Research in Higher Education

, Volume 48, Issue 8, pp 909–940 | Cite as

Foreign-born academic scientists and engineers: producing more and getting less than their U.S.-born peers?

Article

Abstract

The Chronicle of Higher Education recently reported that the number of doctoral degrees awarded in the U.S. rose 3.4 percent in 2004, largely because of an increase in foreign students [Smallwood (2005). Doctoral degrees rose 3.4% in 2004, survey finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education, December 9, 2005]. Currently, 20.9 percent [National Science Board (2003). The science and engineering workforce realizing America’s potential. NSB, vol. 3, National Science Foundation] of all science and engineering faculty positions at U.S. universities are held by foreign-born scientists (with even larger percentages in computer science and engineering)—and we can expect higher numbers of foreign-born faculty at U.S. universities in the future. In this paper, we use 2001 Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR) data from the National Science Foundation to compare productivity levels, work satisfaction levels and career trajectories of foreign-born scientists and U.S.-born scientists. The results indicate that foreign-born academic scientists and engineers are more productive than their U.S.-born peers in all areas. Yet, average salaries and work satisfaction levels for foreign-born scientists are lower than for U.S.-born scientists.

Keywords

science policy publication productivity scientific productivity research policy foreign-born work satisfaction survey 

References

  1. Andrews F. M. (1964). Scientific performance as related to time spent on technical work, teaching, or administration. Administrative Science Quarterly 9:182–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antony J. S., Valadez J. R. (2002). Exploring the satisfaction of part-time college faculty in the United States. Review of Higher Education 26(1):41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Astin H. S., Antonio A. L., Cress C. M., Astin A. W. (1997). Race and ethnicity in the American professoriate, 1995–1996. University of California, Los Angeles: Higher Education Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
  4. Astin H. S., Davis D. E. (1985). Research productivity across the life and career cycles: facilitators and barriers for women. In: Fox M. (Ed) Scholarly writing and publishing: Issues, problems, and solutions. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 147–160Google Scholar
  5. August L., Waltman. J. (2004). Culture, climate, and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education 45(2):177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbezat D. A. (2002). History of pay equity studies. New Directions for Institutional Research 115:9–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellas M. (1993). Faculty salaries: Still a cost of being female? Social Science Quarterly 74:62–75Google Scholar
  8. Bellas M. L., Toutkoushian R. K. (1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: gender, race, and family effects. Review of Higher Education 22:367–390Google Scholar
  9. Bender, K. A., and Heywood. J. S. (2004). Job Satisfaction of the highly educated: The role of gender, academic tenure, and comparison income. In: Science and Engineering Workforce Project. National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  10. Bentley J. T., Adamson. R. (2003). Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  11. Borjas G. J. (1994). The economics of immigration. Journal of Economic Literature 32:1667–1717Google Scholar
  12. Carr P. L., Ash A. S., Friedman R. H., Scaramucci A., Barnett R. C., Szalacha L., Palepu A., Moskowitz M. A. (1998). Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Annals of Internal Medicine 129:532–538Google Scholar
  13. Clark S. M., Corcoran M. (1986). Perspectives on the professional socialization of women faculty: A case of accumulative advantage. Journal of Higher Education 57:20–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark S. M., Lewis D. R. (1985). Faculty vitality and institutional productivity: Critical perspectives for higher education. Teachers College Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  15. Cole J. R., Singer B. (1991). A theory of limited differences: Explaining the productivity puzzle in science. In: Zuckerman H., Cole J. R., Bruer J. T. (eds.) The outer circle: Women in the scientific community, Norton and Company, New York, NY, pp. 277–323Google Scholar
  16. Cole J. R., Zuckerman H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication among men and women scientists. In: Steinkamp M. W., Maehr, M. L., Kleiber, D. A., Nicholls J. G. (eds.) Advances in motivation and achievement, JAI Press, Greenwich, CTGoogle Scholar
  17. Cole J. R., Zuckerman H. (1987). Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science. Scientific American 25:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cole J. R., Zuckerman. H. (1991). Marriage, motherhood, and research performance in science. In: Zuckerman H., Cole J. R., Bruer J. T. (eds.) The outer circle: Women in the scientific community, Norton and Company, New York, NY, pp. 157–169Google Scholar
  19. Corley E. A. (2005). How do career strategies, gender, and work environment affect faculty productivity levels in university-based science centers? Review of Policy Research 22:637–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diamond A. M. (1986). The life-cycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists. Journal of Gerontology 41:520–525Google Scholar
  21. Elder B. (2005). The H-1B visa: Is this the answer to staffing problems? Technical Support 13:9–12Google Scholar
  22. Espenshade T. J., Usdansky M. L., Chung C. Y. (2001). Employment and earnings of foreign-born scientists and engineers. Population Research and Policy Review 20:81–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferber M. A., Green C. A. (1982). Traditional or reverse sex discrimination? A case study of a large public university. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 35:550–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fox M. F. (1992). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education 65:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gappa J. M. (2000). The new faculty majority: Somewhat satisfied but not eligible for tenure. New Directions for Institutional Research 105:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ginther D. K. (2004). Why women earn less: Economic explanations for gender salary gap in science. AWIS Magazine 33:1–5Google Scholar
  27. Ginther D. K., Hayes K. J. (1999). Gender differences in salary and promotion in the Humanities. The American Economic Review 89:397–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hagedorn L. S. (1996). Wage equity and female faculty job satisfaction: The role of wage differentials in a job satisfaction causal model. Research in Higher Education 37:569–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hagedorn L. S. (2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research 105:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Handel M. J. (2005). Trends in perceived job quality, 1989 to 1998. Work and Occupations 32:66–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hattie J., Marsh H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 66:507–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoffman E. P. (1976). Faculty salaries: Is there discrimination by sex, race, and discipline? Additional evidence. The American Economic Review 66:196–198Google Scholar
  33. Johnsrud L. K., Heck R. H. (1994). A university’s faculty: Predicting those who will stay and those who leave. Journal for Higher Education Management 10:71–84Google Scholar
  34. Kalleberg A. L. (1977). Work values and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction. American Sociological Review 42:124–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Katz D. A. (1973). Faculty salaries, promotions, and productivity at a large university. The American Economic Review 63:469–447Google Scholar
  36. Keith B., Layne J. S., Babchuk N., Johnson K. (2002). The context of scientific acheivement: Sex status, organizational environments, and the timing of publication on scholarship outcomes. Social Forces 80:1253–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laden B.V., Hagedorn. L. S. (2000). Job satisfaction among faculty of color in academe: Individual survivors or institutional transformers? New Directions for Institutional Research 105:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee D. M. S. (1992). Job challenge, work effort, and job performance of young engineers: A causal analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 39:214–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, S. (2004). Foreign-born scientists in the United States – Do they perform differently than Native-born scientists? (Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology). Dissertation and Theses: A&I AAT 3155279Google Scholar
  40. Levin S. G., Stephan P. E. (1989). Age and research productivity of academic scientists. Research in Higher Education 30:531–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levin S. G., Stephan P. E. (1999). Are the Foreign-born a source of strength for U.S. Science? Science 285:1213–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levitan A. S., Russ R. (1992). Personal and institutional characteristics affecting research productivity of academic accountants. Journal of Education and Business 67:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liebert R. J. (1977). Research-Grant getting and productivity among scholars: Recent national patterns of competition and favor. Journal of Higher Education 48:164–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lin C. A. (2004). Are foreign scientists good for the U.S. scientific force? Bioscience 54:892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Locke E. A., Fitzpatrick W., White F. M. (1983). Job satisfaction and role clarity among university and college faculty. Review of Higher Education 6:343–363Google Scholar
  46. Loeb J. W., Ferber M. A., Lowry H. M. (1978). The effectiveness of affirmative action for women. Journal of Higher Education 49:218–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Long J. S. (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review 43:889–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Long J. S., Allison P. D., McGinnis R. (1979). Entrance into the academic career. American Sociological Review 44:816–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Long J. S., Fox M. F. (1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology 21:45–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marsh H. W., Hattie J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? Journal of Higher Education 73:603–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mason M. A., Goulden M. (2004). Marriage and baby blues: Redefining gender equity in the academy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 596:86–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Meiksins P. F., Watson J. M. (1989). Professional autonomy and organizational constraint. The Sociological Quarterly 30:561–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meltzer B. N. (1949). The productivity of Social Scientists. The American Journal of Sociology 55:25–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miller-Loessi K., Henderson D. (1997). Changes in American society: The context for academic couples. In: Ferber M. A., Loeb J. W. (Eds) Academic couples, University of Illinois Press, Champaign, IL, pp. 25–43Google Scholar
  55. National Science Board (2003). The science and engineering workforce realizing America’s potential. NSB, vol. 3: National Science FoundationGoogle Scholar
  56. Norris, J. T. (2004). Restrictions on research awards: Troublesome clauses. A report to the AAU/COGR Task Force. Association of American Universities, August, 2004Google Scholar
  57. North D. S. (1995). Soothing the establishment the impact of foreign-born scientists and engineers on America, University Press of America, Inc., Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
  58. Nyquist J. G., Hitchcock M. A., Teherani A. (2000). Faculty Satisfaction in Academic Medicine. New Directions for Institutional Research 105:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Olsen D., Maple S. A., Stage F. K. (1995). Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. Journal of Higher Education 66:267–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Palepu A., Carr P. L., Friedman R. H., Ash A. S., Moskowitz M. A. (2000). Specialty choices, compensation, and career satisfaction of underrepresented minority faculty in academic medicine. Academic Medicine 75:157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Perna L. W. (2001). Sex and race differences in faculty tenure and promotion. Research in Higher Education 42:541–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rausch D. K., Ortiz B. P., Douthitt R. A., Reed. L. L. (1989). The academic revolving door: Why do women get caught? CUPA Journal 40:1–16Google Scholar
  63. Ropers-Huilman B. (2000). Aren’t you satisfied yet? Women faculty members’ interpretations of their academic work. New Directions for Institutional Research 105:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smallwood, S. (2005). Doctoral degrees rose 3.4% in 2004, survey finds. The Chronicle of Higher Education, December 9, 2005Google Scholar
  65. Sonnert, G. with the assistance of Holton, G. (1995). Gender differences in science careers: The Project Access study, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
  66. Stack S. (2004). Gender, children and research productivity. Research in Higher Education 45:891–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stephan P. E., Levin S. G. (2001). Exceptional contributions to US science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated. Population Research and Policy Review 20:59–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stephan, P. E., Sumell, A. J., Black, G. C., and Adams, J. D. (2004). Doctoral education and economic development: The flow of new Ph.D.s to industry. Economic Development Quarterly 18:151–167Google Scholar
  69. Strathman J. G. (2000). Consistent estimation of faculty rank effects in academic salary models. Research in Higher Education 41:237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Toutkoushian R. K. (1998). Racial and marital status differences in faculty pay. Journal of Higher Education 69:513–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Toutkoushian R. K., Bellas M. L. (2003). The effects of part-time employment and gender on faculty earnings and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education 74:172–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Toutkoushian R. K., Conley V. M. (2005). Progress for women in academe, yet inequities persist: Evidence from NSOPF: 99. Research in Higher Education 46:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tuckman B. H., Tuckman H. P. (1976). The structure of salaries at American universities. Journal of Higher Education 47:51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Turner C. S. V. (2002). Women of color in academe: Living with multiple marginality. Journal of Higher Education 73:74–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wanner R. A., Lewis L. S., Gregorio D. I. (1981). Research productivity in academia: A comparative study of the sciences, social sciences and humanities. Sociology of Education 54:238–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ward M. E., Sloane P. J. (2000). Non-pecuniary advantages versus pecuniary disadvantages: Job satisfaction among male and female in Scottish universities. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 47:273–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Watson J. M., Meiksins P. F. (1991). What do engineers want? Work values, job rewards, and job satisfaction. Science, Technology, & Human Values 16:140–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Xie Y., Shauman K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity:New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review 63:847–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zuckerman H. (1991). The careers of men and women scientists: A review of current research. In: Zuckerman H., Cole J. R., Bruer J. T. (Eds) The outer circle: Women in the scientific community, Norton and Company, New York, NY, pp. 27–56Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public AffairsArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations