Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 429–449 | Cite as

COLLEGE MAJOR CHOICE: An Analysis of Person–Environment Fit

  • Stephen R. PorterEmail author
  • Paul D. Umbach
Article

Abstract

Although recent research suggests that congruence between students and their academic environment is critical for successful student outcomes, little research has been done on student college major choice. Using Holland’s theory of careers, we analyze college major choice using a multinomial logit model. We use the CIRP Freshman Survey and institutional data for three cohorts of first-year students at a selective liberal arts college to study the factors that affect college major choice, both at entry and at graduation.

KEY WORDS

major choice Holland 

References

  1. Astin, A. W. (1993). What Matters in College: Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  2. Baird, L. L. (1988). The college environment revisited. In: Smart, J. (ed.), Higher Education Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 25), Agathon, Edison, NJ, pp. 1–52Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: FreemanGoogle Scholar
  5. Betz, N. E., and Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior 23(3): 329–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In: Karabel, J., and Halsey, A. H. (eds.), Power and Ideology in Education, Oxford University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 487–511Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of capital. In: Richardson J. G. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Greenwood Press, New York, NY, pp. 241–260Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P., and Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. Beverly Hills, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameron, K., and Ettington, D. (1988). The conceptual foundations of organizational culture. In: Smart J. (ed.), Higher Education Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. 4.), Agathon, Edison, NJ, pp. 356–396Google Scholar
  10. Chickering, A. (1969). Education and Identity. San Fransisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, C. S., Ginorio, A. B., Hollenshead, C., Lazarus, B. B., Rayman, P. M., and Associates (1996). The Equity Equation: Fostering the Advancement of Women in the Sciences, Mathematics, and Engineering. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  12. Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2: 62–72Google Scholar
  13. Feldman, K. A., and Newcomb, T. M. (1969). The Impact of College on Students. San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldman, K. A., Smart, J. C., and Ethington, C. (1999). Major field and person–environment fit: Using Holland’s theory to study change and stability in college students. Journal of Higher Education 70(6): 642–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gamoran, A., and Mare, R. D. (1989). Secondary school tracking and education inequality: Compensation, reinforcement or neutrality? American Journal of Sociology 94(5): 1146–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hagedorn, L. S., Nora, A., and Pascarella, E. T. (1996). Preoccupational segregation among first-year college students: An application of the Duncan dissimilarity index. Journal of College Student Development 37(4): 425–437Google Scholar
  17. Hall, R., and Sandler, B. R. (1982). Out of the Classroom: A Chilly Campus Climate for Women?, Association of American Colleges and Universities, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartnett, R. T., and Centra, J. A. (1977). The effects of academic departments on student learning. The Journal of Higher Education 48(5): 491–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hauser, R. M., and Warren, J. R. (1997). Socioeconomic indexes for occupations: A review, update, and critique. Sociological Methodology 27: 177–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heyns, B. (1974). Social selection and stratification within schools. American Journal of Sociology 79: 1434–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holland, J. L. (1966). The Psychology of Vocational Choice. Waltham, MA: BlaisdellGoogle Scholar
  22. Holland, J. L. (1985). Making Vocational Choices. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  23. Holland, J. L., Powell, A. B., and Fritzsche, B. A. (1994). The Self Directed Search Professional User’s Guide. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobs, J. A. (1986). The sex-segragation of fields of study: Trends during the college years. Journal of Higher Education 57(2): 134–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kanter, R. M. (1993). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York, NY: BasicBooksGoogle Scholar
  26. Lackland, A. C. (2001). Students’ choices of college majors that are gender traditional and nontraditional. Journal of College Student Development 42(1): 39–47Google Scholar
  27. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., and Larkin, K. C. (1984). Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistance. Journal of Counseling Psychology 31: 356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leslie, L. L., and Oaxaca, R. L. (1998). Women and minorities in higher education. In: Smart J. C. (ed.), Higher Education Handbook on Theory and Research (Vol. 13), Agathon, New York, pp. 304–352Google Scholar
  29. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  30. National Research Council. (1991). Women in science and engineering: Increasing their numbers in the 1990s, National Academy Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  31. National Research Council. (1994). Survey of earned doctorates, National Academy Press, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  32. Pascarella, E. T., Ethington, C. A., and Smart, J. C. (1988). The influence of college on humanitarian/civic involvement values. Journal of Higher Education 59(4): 412–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenbaum, J. E. (1976). Making Inequality. New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar
  35. Sandler, B. R., and Hall, R. (1986). The Campus Climate Revisited: Chilly for Women Faculty, Administrators, and Graduate Students, Association of American Colleges and Universities, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  36. Sells, L. (1973). High School Mathematics as a Critical Filter in the Job Market. Berkeley, CA: University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  37. Simpson, J. C. (2001). Segregated differences by subject: Racial differences in the factors influencing academic major between european americans, asian americans, and african, hispanic, and native americans. Journal of Higher Education 72(1): 63–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smart, J. C., Feldman, K. A., and Ethington, C. A. (2000). Academic Disciplines: Holland’s Theory and the Study of College Students and Faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University PressGoogle Scholar
  39. Solnick, S. (1995). Changes in women’s majors from entrance to graduation at women’s and coeducational colleges. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48(3): 505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. St. John, E.P., Hu, S., Simmons, A., Carter, D.F., and Weber, J. (2004). What difference does a major make? The influence of college major field on persistence by african american and white students. Research in Higher Education 45(3): 209–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thompson, M. D. and Smart, J. C. (1999). Student competencies emphasized by faculty in disparate academic environments. Journal of College Student Development 40(4): 365–376Google Scholar
  42. U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Gender differences in earnings among young adults entering the labor market (NCES 98-086), National Center for Education Statistics,Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  43. U.S. Department of Education. (2001). From bachelor’s degree to work: Major field of study and employment outcomes of 1992–1993 bachelor’s degree recipients who did not enroll in graduate education by 1997 (NCES 2001–165), National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  44. Vrugt, A. (1994). Perceived self-efficacy, social comparison, affective reactions and academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 64: 465–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Vrugt, A., Langereis, M. P., and Hoogstraten, J. (1997). Academic self-efficacy and malleability of relavent capabilities as predictors of exam performance. Journal of Experimental Education 66(1): 61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Leadership and Policy StudiesIowa State UniversityAmesIAUSA
  2. 2.Educational Policy and Leadership StudiesUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations