Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 137–151 | Cite as

Sustainability of threatened species displayed in public aquaria, with a case study of Australian sharks and rays

  • Kathryn A. BuckleyEmail author
  • David A. Crook
  • Richard D. Pillans
  • Liam Smith
  • Peter M. Kyne


Zoos and public aquaria exhibit numerous threatened species globally, and in the modern context of these institutions as conservation hubs, it is crucial that displays are ecologically sustainable. Elasmobranchs (sharks and rays) are of particular conservation concern and a higher proportion of threatened species are exhibited than any other assessed vertebrate group. Many of these lack sustainable captive populations, so comprehensive assessments of sustainability may be needed to support the management of future harvests and safeguard wild populations. We propose an approach to identify species that require an assessment of sustainability. Species at risk of extinction in the wild were considered to be those assessed as threatened (CR, EN or VU) on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, or data deficient species that may be at an elevated risk of extinction due to life history traits and habitat associations. We defined sustainable captive populations as self-maintaining, or from a source population that can sustain harvest levels without risk of population declines below sustainable levels. The captive breeding and wild harvest records of at risk species displayed by Australian aquaria were examined as a case study. Two species, largetooth sawfish Pristis pristis and grey nurse shark Carcharias taurus, were found to have unsustainable captive populations and were identified as high priorities for comprehensive sustainability assessments. This review highlights the need for changes in permitting practices and zoo and aquarium record management systems to improve conservation outcomes for captive elasmobranchs.


Aquarium display Conservation benefits Elasmobranch Sustainability assessment Zoos 



We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Marine Biodiversity Hub and the Northern Australia Hub, collaborative partnerships supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Research Program and National Environmental Science Program. The Northern Territory Government (Territory Wildlife Park and NT Department of Primary Industries and Resources) contributed essential in-kind support for this project; while National Geographic, the Oceania Chondrichthyan Society/Passions of Paradise, and the Australasian Society of Zoo Keeping provided valuable financial support.

Supplementary material

11160_2017_9501_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)
11160_2017_9501_MOESM2_ESM.docx (98 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 97 kb)
11160_2017_9501_MOESM3_ESM.docx (38 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 38 kb)
11160_2017_9501_MOESM4_ESM.docx (24 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 24 kb)


  1. AES (2008) The American Elasmobranch Society (AES) International Captive Elasmobranch Census (AES CEC) 2008. The American Elasmobranch Society, Dade CountyGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett MB, Kyne PM (2003) Carcharhinus cautus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  3. Beri V, Tranent A, Abelson P (2010) The economic and social contribution of the zoological industry in Australia. Int Zoo Yearb 44:192–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1090.2009.00104-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J (2012) Sustainability assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 30:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlson J, Wiley T, Smith K (2013) Pristis pectinata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  6. Compagno LJV, Pogonoski J, Pollard D (2009) Glyphis glyphis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  7. Conde DA, Flesness N, Colchero F, Jones OR, Scheuerlein A (2011) An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity. Science 331:1390–1391. doi: 10.1126/science.1200674 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Conde DA, Colchero F, Gusset M, Pearce-Kelly P, Byers O, Flesness N, Jones OR (2013) Zoos through the lens of the IUCN Red List: a global metapopulation approach to support conservation breeding programs. PLoS ONE 8:e80311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080311 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. de Araújo MLG, Charvet-Almeida P, Almeida MP, Pereira H (2004) Freshwater stingrays (Potamotrygonidae): status, conservation and management challenges. CITES Information Document. AC20 (8):1–6. Accessed 25 June 2015
  10. DOE (2014) Recovery plan for the grey nurse shark (Carcharias taurus). Department of the Environment (DOE), Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  11. DOE (2015) Sawfish and river sharks multispecies recovery plan. Department of the Environment (DOE), Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  12. Dudgeon CL, Simpfendorfer C, Pillans RD (2016) Stegostoma fasciatum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  13. Dulvy NK, Reynolds JD (2002) Predicting extinction vulnerability in skates. Conserv Biol 16:440–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dulvy NK, Notarbartolo di Sciara G, Serena F, Tinti F, Ungaro N, Mancusi C, Ellis J (2006) Dipturus batis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  15. Dulvy NK et al (2014) Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays. eLife 3:e00590. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00590 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. EPBC Act (1999) Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) list of threatened fauna. Office of Legislative Drafting and Publishing (OLDP), Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  17. Eschmeyer WN, Fricke R, van der Laan R (eds) (2016) Catalog of fishes. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  18. Ferretti F, Morey G, Serena F, Mancusi C, Fowler SL, Dipper F, Ellis J (2015) Squatina squatina. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  19. García Vásquez A, Sánchez Riveiro H, Valverde D, García Dávila C, Ortega Torres H, Reyes Ramírez C, Reategui Ocampo D, Perea Sicchar C, Panduro M, Moya Vásquez L, Moncada Gallardo T, Chavez Mendoza G, Correa E (2016) Potamotrygon tigrina. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  20. ISIS (2015a) International Species Information System (ISIS). World Wide Web online database. Accessed 25 June 2015
  21. ISIS (2015b) ZIMS for aquariums. International Species Information System (ISIS). Accessed 25 June 2015
  22. IUCN (2002) Technical guidelines in the management of ex situ populations for conservation. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  23. IUCN (2016) International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 20 Jan 2017
  24. Kyne PM, Carlson J, Smith K (2013) Pristis pristis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  25. Lacy RC (2013) Achieving true sustainability of zoo populations. Zoo Biol 32:19–26. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Last PR, Stevens JD (2009) Sharks and rays of Australia, 2nd edn. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  27. Last PR, White WT, Séret B (2016) Taxonomic status of maskrays of the Neotrygon kuhlii species complex (Myliobatoidei: Dasyatidae) with the description of three new species from the Indo-West Pacific. Zootaxa 4083:533–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lees CM, Wilcken J (2011) Towards sustainable population management. World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (WAZA) Magazine. Vol 12. Agentura NP, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  29. Lessa R, Vooren CM (2007) Rhinobatos horkelii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  30. Murray JM, Watson GJ (2014) A critical assessment of marine aquarist biodiversity data and commercial aquaculture: identifying gaps in culture initiatives to inform local fisheries managers. PLoS ONE 9:e105982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105982 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Nel R, Yahya S, Jiddawi N, Semesi S (2004) Pseudoginglymostoma brevicaudatum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  32. NSW Primary Industries (2005) World’s first “test tube” sharks to be bred in NSW laboratories. Media Release Archives, NSW Primary Industries, NSW Government. Accessed 20 Jan 2017
  33. Okemwaab GM, Kaunda-Ararab B, Kimania EN, Ogutuc B (2016) Catch composition and sustainability of the marine aquarium fishery in Kenya. Fish Res 183:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pierce SJ, Norman B (2016) Rhincodon typus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  35. Pillans R (2003) Nebrius ferrugineus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  36. Redford KH, Jensen DB, Breheny JJ (2012) Integrating the captive and the wild. Science 338:1157–1158. doi: 10.1126/science.1228899 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Roelofs A, Silcock R (2008) A sustainability assessment of marine fish species collected in the Queensland marine aquarium trade. Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosa RS, Castro ALF, Furtado M, Monzini J, Grubbs RD (2006) Ginglymostoma cirratum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  39. Simpfendorfer CA (2013) Pristis zijsron. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016.3. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  40. Simpfendorfer CA, Dulvy NK (2017) Bright spots of sustainable shark fishing. Curr Biol 27:R97–R98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Smale MJ, Booth AJ, Farquhar MR, Meÿer MR, Rochat L (2012) Migration and habitat use of formerly captive and wild raggedtooth sharks (Carcharias taurus) on the southeast coast of South Africa. Mar Biol Res 8:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith MFL (1992) Capture and transportation of elasmobranchs, with emphasis on the grey nurse shark (Carcharias taurus). Mar Freshwater Res 43:325–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith MFL et al. (2013) The role of aquaria in the recovery of Australian grey nurse shark populations. Presentation at the grey nurse shark symposium, September 2013, Brisbane, Australia. Accessed 25 June 2015
  44. Stevens JD, Bonfil R, Dulvy NK, Walker PA (2000) The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES J Mar Sci 57:476–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tissot BN, Hallacher LE (2003) Effects of aquarium collectors on coral reef fishes in Kona Hawaii. Conserv Biol 17:1759–1768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tlusty MF (2002) The benefits and risks of aquacultural production for the aquarium trade. Aquaculture 205:203–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tlusty MF et al (2013) Opportunities for public aquariums to increase the sustainability of the aquatic animal trade. Zoo Biol 32:1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. WAZA (2009) Turning the Tide. A Global Aquarium Strategy for Conservation and Sustainability. World Association of Zoos and Aquaria (WAZA), Berne, Switzerland. Accessed 25 June 2015
  49. White WT (2014) A revised generic arrangement for the eagle ray family Myliobatidae, with definitions for the valid genera. Zootaxa 3860:149–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. ZAA (2014) Zoo Aquarium association (ZAA) code of ethics. Accessed 17 Jan 2015
  51. ZAA (2015) The Australasian Species Management Program (ASMP) regional census and plan. Zoo Aquarium Association (ZAA), AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  52. ZAA (2016) Zoo Aquarium Association (ZAA) collection planning online system (CPOS). Accessed 20 Nov 2016Google Scholar
  53. Zimmermann A, Hatchwell M, Dickie L, West CE (2007) Zoos in the 21st century: catalysts for conservation?. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Zootierliste (2017) Zootierliste: a current and former vertebrate inventory of European zoos and other public collections. Accessed 28 Jan 2017
  55. ZSL (2014) Zoos and aquariums of the world. The Zoological Society of London (ZSL). Int Zoo Yearb 48:250–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute for the Environment and LivelihoodsCharles Darwin UniversityDarwinAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Oceans and AtmosphereDutton ParkAustralia
  3. 3.BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Building 74Monash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations