Advertisement

Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 205–223 | Cite as

The importance of seahorses and pipefishes in the diet of marine animals

  • D. Kleiber
  • L. K. Blight
  • I. R. Caldwell
  • A. C. J. Vincent
Reviews

Abstract

A review of 135 accounts of predation on seahorses and pipefishes identified 82 predator species, with nine species of seahorses and 25 of pipefishes recorded as prey. These cryptic fishes were generally depredated in low numbers. Where syngnathids formed a high proportion of predator diets, predation occurred on (1) a single abundant species during a population boom or large die-off, (2) concentrations of individuals utilising floating marine vegetation, or (3) juveniles when abundant during the breeding season. Predation coinciding with high syngnathid densities suggests their predators are foraging opportunistically rather than targeting syngnathids as prey. Invertebrates, fishes, sea turtles, waterbirds and marine mammals were all syngnathid predators: these included taxa that do not frequent the demersal habitat generally occupied by seahorses and pipefishes. Thus, seahorses and pipefishes may be moving in the open ocean more than suspected, perhaps using floating mats of marine vegetation. If so, this behaviour could act as a hitherto unknown vector for syngnathid movement and dispersal. Information on syngnathid abundance in predator diet (measured as percent number, volume, or mass) was available in 45 reviewed accounts; in 27% (n = 12) of these studies seahorses or pipefishes comprised ≥20% of predator diet (range 0.005–100%). Frequency of occurrence (percent stomachs, seabird bill-loads, or regurgitations in which a prey item occurred) was provided in 39 accounts, with 15% (n = 6) of these recording a frequency of ≥20% (range 0.003–65%).

Keywords

Marine food webs Predator–prey interactions Syngnathidae Hippocampus Crypsis Dispersal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Seabird-L listserve members who responded to Mike Harris’s original request for information on snake pipefish in seabird diets, to Mike Harris himself for sharing offline responses, and to those who replied to our request for information via the Project Seahorse syngnathid listserve. Conversations with Mike Harris, Sarah Wanless and Keith Martin-Smith also provided insight into the E. aequoreus population boom and its effects on top predators, and comments by Iain Taylor and two anonymous reviewers improved the manuscript. This work was supported by a generous anonymous donation to fund DK, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada post-graduate awards (IRC and LKB), a Canadian Federation of University Women’s Dr. Alice E. Wilson award (LKB), and a Koerner Foundation fellowship (LKB). Project Seahorse is supported by Guylian Chocolates (Belgium) and the John G. Shedd Aquarium, through partnerships in marine conservation.

Supplementary material

11160_2010_9167_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (21 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 22 kb)

References

  1. Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia (ANSP) (1917) Cat. No. 87726. ANSP, Academy of Natural Sciences, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. ANSP (1924) Cat. No. 89313. Academy of Natural Sciences, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  3. ANSP (No Date) Cat. No. 79700. Academy of Natural Sciences, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  4. Alverson FG (1963) The food of yellowfin and skipjack tunas in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean. Inter-Am Trop Tuna Comm Bull 5Google Scholar
  5. Anker-Nilssen T, Aarvak T (2006) Long-term studies of Atlantic puffins and other seabirds in the municipality of Røst, Nordland. Nor Inst Nat Res Rapp 133Google Scholar
  6. Becker PH, Frank D, Walter U (1987) Geographische und jährliche Variation der Ernährung der Flußseeschwalbe (Sterna hirundo) an der Nordseeküste. J Ornith 128:457–475Google Scholar
  7. Berglund A (1993) Risky sex: male pipefishes mate at random in the presence of a predator. Anim Behav 46:169–175Google Scholar
  8. Bigelow HB, Schroeder WC (1962) New and little known batoid fishes from the western Atlantic. Bull Mus Comp Zool Harv 128:230–234Google Scholar
  9. Blanc A, Pinczon du Sel G, Daguzan J (1998) Habitat and diet of early stages of Sepia officinalis L. (Cephalopoda) in Morbihan Bay, France. J Molluscan Stud 64:263–274Google Scholar
  10. Bleakney JS (1967) Food items in two loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta caretta (L.) from Nova Scotia. Can Field-Nat 81:269–272Google Scholar
  11. Bowman RE, Stillwell CE, Michaels WL, Grosslein MD (2000) Food of northwest Atlantic fishes and two common species of squid. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-NE 155Google Scholar
  12. Buckel JA, Fogarty MJ, Conover DO (1999) Foraging habits of bluefish, Pomatomus saltatrix, on the U.S. east coast continental shelf. Fish Bull 97:758–775Google Scholar
  13. Burke VJ, Morreale SJ, Rhodin AGJ (1993) Lepidochelys kempii (Kemp’s ridley sea turtle) and Caretta caretta (loggerhead sea turtle) diet. Herpetol Rev 24:31–32Google Scholar
  14. Castro BG, Guerra Á (1990) The diet of Sepia officinalis (Linnaeus, 1758) and Sepia elegans (D’Orbingny, 1835) (Cephalopoda, Sepioidea) from Ría de Vigo (NW Spain). Sci Mar 54:375–388Google Scholar
  15. Chiaradia A, Costalunga A, Kerry K (2003) The diet of Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) at Phillip Island, Victoria, in the absence of a major prey–Pilchard (Sardinops sagax). Emu 103:43–48Google Scholar
  16. Connell KL (2007) Dietary response of the elegant tern (Thalasseus elegans) to changing ocean conditions and prey populations in southern California. MS Thesis, California State University FullertonGoogle Scholar
  17. Costa MJ (1988) Écologie alimentaire des poissons de l’estuarie du Tage. Cybium 12:301–320Google Scholar
  18. Cruz VH, Abitia LA, Campos L, Galvan F (2000) Trophic biology contributions of the slender-spined catfish Arius platypogon (Günther, 1864), in San Ignacio Lagoon, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Rev Biol Mar Oceanogr 35:41–47Google Scholar
  19. Cullen JM, Montague TL, Hull C (1992) Food of Little Penguins Eudyptula minor in Victoria: comparisons of three localities between 1985 and 1988. Emu 91:318–341Google Scholar
  20. Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 205:489–511Google Scholar
  21. de Gee A, Kikkert AH (1993) Analysis of the grey gurnard (Eutrigla gurnardus) samples collected during the 1991 International Stomach Sampling Project. ICES CM Demersal Fish Comm G 14Google Scholar
  22. Dew CB (1988) Stomach contents of commercially caught Hudson River striped bass, Morone saxatilis, 1973–75. Fish Bull 86:397–401Google Scholar
  23. Edgar GJ, Shaw C (1995) The production and trophic ecology of shallow-water fish assemblages in southern Australia II. Diets of fishes and trophic relationships between fishes and benthos at Western Port, Victoria. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 194:83–106Google Scholar
  24. Endler JA (1986) Defense against predators. In: Feder ME, Lauder GV (eds) Predator–prey relationships: perspectives and approaches from the study of lower vertebrates. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 109–134Google Scholar
  25. Favero M, Mariano-Jelicich R, Silva MP, Bo MS, Carcia-Mata C (2001) Food and feeding biology of the black skimmer in Argentina: evidence supporting offshore feeding in nonbreeding areas. Waterbirds 24:413–418Google Scholar
  26. Foster S, Vincent ACJ (2004) Life history and ecology of seahorses: implications for conservation and management. J Fish Biol 65:1–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2004.00429.x Google Scholar
  27. Fraser MM, Lalas C (2004) Seasonal variation in the diet of blue penguins (Eudyptula minor) at Oamaru, New Zealand. Notornis 51:7–15Google Scholar
  28. Frick S, Becker PH (1995) Unterschiedliche Ernährungsstrategien von Fluß- und Küstenseeschwalbe (Sterna hirundo und S. paradisaea) im Wattenmeer. J Ornith 136:47–63Google Scholar
  29. Fries B, Ekström CU, Sundevall C (1895) A history of Scandinavian fishes. P. A. Norstedt & Söner, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  30. Frieswijk J (1999) Een merkwaardige vindplaats van een zeelaald Syngnathus spec. Zeepaard 59:29–30Google Scholar
  31. Froese R, Pauly D (2009) FishBase. www.fishbase.org. Accessed 15 Jan 2009
  32. Fuller R, Berglund A (1996) Behavioral responses of a sex-role reversed pipefish to a gradient of perceived predation risk. Behav Ecol 7:69–75Google Scholar
  33. Gales RP, Pemberton D (1990) Seasonal and local variation in the diet of the Little Penguin, Eudyptula minor, in Tasmania. Aus Wildl Res 17:231–259Google Scholar
  34. Gendron RP (1986) Searching for cryptic prey: evidence for optimal search rates and the formation of search images in quail. Anim Behav 34:898–912Google Scholar
  35. Gibbs RH Jr, Collette BB (1959) On the identification, distribution, and biology of the dolphins, Coryphaena hippurus and C. equiselis. Bull Mar Sci Gulf Caribb 9:117–152Google Scholar
  36. González P, Oyarzún C (2003) Diet of the Chilean sandperch, Pinguipes chilensis (Perciformes, Pinguipedidae) in the southern Chile. J Appl Ichthyol 19:371–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2003.00444.x Google Scholar
  37. Gordina AD, Oven LS, Tkach AV, Glimova TN (1991) Distribution, reproduction, and diet of the pelagic pipefish, Syngnathus schmidti, in the Black Sea. J Ichthyol 31:110–119Google Scholar
  38. Guilford T, Dawkins MS (1987) Search images not proven: a reappraisal of recent evidence. Anim Behav 35:1838–1845Google Scholar
  39. Haney JC, Lee DS, Morris RD (1999) Bridled Tern (Sterna anaethetus). In: Poole A (ed) The Birds of North America Online. Ithaca, Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/468. doi: 10.2173/bna.468. Accessed 10 March 2009
  40. Harris MP (2006) Seabirds and pipefish: a request for records. Br Birds 99:148Google Scholar
  41. Harris MP, Beare D, Toresen R, Nøttestad L, Kloppmann M, Dörner H, Peach K, Rushton DRA, Foster-Smith J, Wanless S (2007a) A major increase in snake pipefish (Entelurus aequoreus) in northern European seas since 2003: potential implications for seabird breeding success. Mar Biol 151:973–983Google Scholar
  42. Harris MP, Newell M, Daunt F, Speakman JR, Wanless S (2007b) Snake pipefish Entelurus aequoreus are poor food for seabirds. Ibis 150:413–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00780.x Google Scholar
  43. Harvey JT (1989) Food habits, seasonal abundance, size, and sex of the blue shark, Prionace glauca, in Monterey Bay, California. Cal Fish Game 75:33–44Google Scholar
  44. Hatch JJ (2002) Arctic Tern (Sterna paradisaea). In: Poole A (ed) The Birds of North America Online. Ithaca, Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/707. doi: 10.2173/bna.707. Accessed 10 March 2009
  45. Hedd A, Bertram DF, Ryder JL, Jones IL (2006) Effects of interdecadal climate variability on marine trophic interactions: rhinoceros auklets and their fish prey. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 309:263–278Google Scholar
  46. Herald ES (1949) Pipefishes and seahorses as food for tuna. Cal Fish Game 35:329Google Scholar
  47. Hindell JS (2006) Assessing the trophic link between seagrass habitats and piscivorous fishes. Mar Freshw Res 57:121–131Google Scholar
  48. Hindell JS, Jenkins GP, Keogh MJ (2000a) Variability in abundances of fishes associated with seagrass habitats in relation to diets of predatory fishes. Mar Biol 136:725–737Google Scholar
  49. Hindell JS, Jenkins GP, Keogh MJ (2000b) Evaluating the impact of predation by fish on the assemblage structure of fishes associated with seagrass (Heterozostera tasmanica) (Martens ex Ascherson) den Hartog, and unvegetated sand habitats. J Exp Biol Ecol 255:153–174Google Scholar
  50. Hindell JS, Jenkins GP, Keogh MJ (2002) Variability in the numbers of post-settlement King George whiting (Sillaginidae: Sillaginoides punctata, Cuvier) in relation to predation, habitat complexity and artificial cage structure. J Exp Biol Ecol 268:13–31Google Scholar
  51. Horn MH, Hendricks JN, Flisik TJ (2009) Pipefish rise in the west: recent dramatic increase in the diet of the Elegant Tern (Thalasseus elegans) nesting in southern California. In: Seabird Group 10th International Conference. Brugge, Belgium, 2009Google Scholar
  52. Howard RK, Koehn JD (1985) Population dynamics and feeding ecology of pipefish (Syngnathidae) associated with eelgrass beds of Western Port, Victoria. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 36:361–370Google Scholar
  53. Humphries P, Hyndes GA, Potter IC (1992) Comparisons between the diets of distant taxa (Teleost and Cormorant) in an Australian estuary. Estuaries 15:327–334Google Scholar
  54. Kendrick AJ, Hyndes GA (2003) Patterns in the abundance and size-distribution of syngnathid fishes among habitats in a seagrass-dominated marine environment. Estuarine Coast Shelf Sci 57:631–640Google Scholar
  55. Kent DM (1986) Behavior, habitat use, and food of three egrets in a marine habitat. Colon Waterbirds 9:25–30Google Scholar
  56. Kingston S, O’Connell M, Fairley JS (1999) Diet of otters Lutra lutra on Inishmore, Aran Islands, West coast of Ireland. Biol Env Proc Roy Ir Acad 99B:173–182Google Scholar
  57. Kirby RR, Johns DG, Lindley JA (2006) Fathers in hot water: rising sea temperatures and a Northeastern Atlantic pipefish baby boom. Biol Lett Online 2:597–600Google Scholar
  58. Kloppmann MHF, Ulleweit J (2007) Off-shelf distribution of pelagic snake pipefish Entelurus aequoreus (Linneus 1758), west of the British Isles. Mar Biol 151:271–275Google Scholar
  59. Kloppmann M, Ehrich S, Karl H (2007) Die grosse schlangennadel als nahrung für seevögel. Seevögel 28:18–24Google Scholar
  60. Klumpp DW, Nichols PD (1983) A study of food chains in seagrass communities II. Food of the rock flathead, Platycephalus laevigatus Cuvier, a major predator in a Posidonia australis seagrass bed. Aus J Mar Freshw Res 34:745–754Google Scholar
  61. Kornilova GN (1980) Feeding of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, and bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus, in the Equatorial zone of the Indian ocean. J Ichthyol 20:111–119Google Scholar
  62. Krause J, Cheng DJS, Kirkman E, Ruxton GD (2000) Species-specific patterns of refuge use in fish: the role of metabolic expenditure and body length. Behav 137:1113–1127Google Scholar
  63. Kuiter RH (2000) Seahorses, pipefishes and their relatives. A comprehensive guide to Syngnathiformes. TMC Publishing, Chorleywood, UKGoogle Scholar
  64. Kuiter RH (2009) Seahorses and their relatives. Aquatic Photographics, Seaford, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  65. Lourie SA, Foster SJ, Cooper EWT, Vincent ACJ (2004) A guide to the identification of seahorses. Project Seahorse, University of British Columbia and TRAFFIC North America. World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  66. Lumsden WHR, Haddow AJ (1946) The food of the shag (Phalacrocorax aristotelis) in the Clyde Sea area. J Anim Ecol 15:35–42Google Scholar
  67. Magurran AE (1990) The adaptive significance of schooling as an antipredator defence in fish. Ann Zool Fenn 27:51–66Google Scholar
  68. Mallet J (2004) The peppered moth: a black and white story after all. Genet Soc News 50:34–38Google Scholar
  69. Martin-Smith KM (2008) Role of syngnathids in shallow coastal ecosystems of Southeastern Australia. In: Forrest RE, Scandol JP, Pitcher TJ (eds) Towards ecosystem-based fishery management in New South Wales–proceedings of the experts and data workshop, December 8–10, 2003, Cronulla, Australia. Fish Cent Res Rep 14:89–100. University of British Columbia Fisheries Centre, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  70. Martin-Smith KM, Vincent ACJ (2005) Seahorse declines in the Derwent estuary, Tasmania in the absence of fishing pressure. Biol Conserv 123:533–545Google Scholar
  71. Massutí E, Deudero S, Sánchez P, Morales-Nin B (1998) Diet and feeding of dolphin (Coryphaena hippurus) in western Mediterranean waters. Bull Mar Sci 63:329–341Google Scholar
  72. Matthews FD, Damkaer DM, Knapp LW, Collette BB (1977) Food of western north Atlantic tunas (Thunnus) and lancetfishes (Alepisaurus). NOAA Technical Report NMFS SSRF-706Google Scholar
  73. Mcintyre JW, Barr JF (1997) Common Loon (Gavia immer). In: Poole A (ed) The Birds of North America Online. Ithaca, Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/313. doi: 10.2173/bna.313. Accessed 10 March 2009
  74. Meyer M, Smale MJ (1991) Predation patterns of demersal teleosts from the Cape south and west coasts of South Africa. 2. Benthic and epibenthic predators. S Afr J Mar Sci 11:409–442Google Scholar
  75. Money S (2005) St Kilda seabird and marine ranger annual report 2005. National Trust for Scotland, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  76. Montague TL, Cullen JM (1988) The diet of the Little Penguin Eudyptula minor at Phillip Island, Victoria. Emu 88:137–149Google Scholar
  77. Newell M (2006) An abundance of pipefish. Br Birds 99:500–501Google Scholar
  78. Nisbet ICT (1983) Territorial feeding by Common Terns. Colon Waterbirds 6:64–70Google Scholar
  79. Northern Territory Museum (NTM) (No Date) Specimen Number S12060-001. Museum and Art Galleries of the Northern Territory, Darwin, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  80. Orsi Relini L, Cima C, Palandri G, Relini M, Garibaldi F (1999) Feeding of the juvenile bluefin tuna in the offshore pelagic ecosystem of the Ligurian sea. Biol Mar Mediterr 6:295–302Google Scholar
  81. Ouwehand J, Leopold MF, Camphuysen CJ (2004) A comparative study of the diet of guillemots Uria aalge and razorbills Alca torda killed during the Tricolor oil incident in the south-eastern North Sea in January 2003. Atl Seab 6:147–164Google Scholar
  82. Pinczon du Sel G, Blanc A, Daguzan J (2000) The diet of the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis L. (mollusca: cephalopoda) during its life cycle in the Northern Bay of Biscay (France). Aquat Sci 61:167–178Google Scholar
  83. Pitcher TJ, Parrish JK (1993) Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) Behaviour of teleost fishes, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 363–437Google Scholar
  84. Plath M, Schlupp I (2008) Parallel evolution leads to reduced shoaling behavior in two cave dwelling populations of Atlantic mollies (Poecilia mexicana, Poeciliidae, Teleostei). Env Biol Fishes 82:289–297Google Scholar
  85. Popova OA, S’erra L (1983) Feeding of black jack, Caranx ruber (Carangidae), on the Cuban shelf in the Gulf of Batabano. I. Seasonal and age-dependent dynamics of feeding. J Ichthyol 23:97–105Google Scholar
  86. Pouchet G, de Guerne J (1940) Sur l’alimentation des tortues marines. Résult camp sci Prince Monaco 103:241–242Google Scholar
  87. Randall JE, Brock VE (1960) Observations on the ecology of Epinephelinae and lutjanid fishes of the Society Islands, with emphasis on food habits. Trans Am Fish Soc 89:9–16Google Scholar
  88. Reijnders R, Keijl G (1997) Stormmeeuwen Larus canus eten kleine zeenaalden Syngnathus rostellatus Common gulls eat Nilsson’s pipefish. Sula 11:227–229Google Scholar
  89. Richards SW, Schew WA (1989) Species composition of food brought to Roseate Tern chicks on Falkner Island, Connecticut in summer 1984. Conn Warbler 9:1–5Google Scholar
  90. Riegner MF (1982) The diet of Yellow-crowned Night-Herons in the eastern and southern United States. Colon Waterbirds 5:173–176Google Scholar
  91. Robertson AI (1982) Population dynamics and feeding ecology of juvenile Australian salmon (Arripis trutta) in Western Port, Victoria. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 33:369–375Google Scholar
  92. Roelke DL, Sogard SM (1993) Gender-based differences in habitat selection and activity level in the northern pipefish (Syngnathus fuscus). Copeia 2:528–532Google Scholar
  93. Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals, and mimicry. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  94. Safina C, Wagner RH, Witting DA, Smith KJ (1990) Prey delivery to roseate and common tern chicks: composition and temporal variability. J Field Ornithol 61:331–338Google Scholar
  95. Saglam H, Bascinar NS (2008) Feeding ecology of thornback ray (Raja clavata Linnaeus, 1758) on the Turkish coast of the south-eastern Black Sea. Mar Biol Res 4:451–457Google Scholar
  96. Seahorse2000 (2007) Seashore Newsl 3:1–4Google Scholar
  97. Seghers BH (1974) Schooling behaviour in the guppy Poecilia reticulata: an evolutionary response to predation. Evol 28:486–489Google Scholar
  98. Segura-Zarzosa JC, Abitia-Cárdenas LA, Galván-Magaña F (1997) Observations on the feeding habits of the shark Heterodontus francisci Girard 1854 (Chondrichthyes: Heterodontidae), in San Ignacio Lagoon, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Cienc Mar 23:111–128Google Scholar
  99. Sharpe J (1998) Dolphin: the perfect gamefish. Fisherman’s International Publishing House, Summerland Key, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  100. Shaw DN, Butcher RJ, Warren M, Tallack R (2005) Fair Isle seabird studies 2005. Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  101. Sih A (1994) Predation risk and the evolutionary ecology of reproductive behaviour. J Fish Biol 45:111–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1994.tb01087.x Google Scholar
  102. Sih A (1997) To hide or not to hide? Refuge use in a fluctuating environment. Trends Ecol Evol 12:375–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Smith RJF (1997) Avoiding and deterring predators. In: Godin GJ (ed) Behavioural ecology of teleost fishes. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  104. Sonntag N, Hüppop O (2005) Snacks from the depth: summer and winter diet of common guillemots Uria aalge around the island of Helgoland. Atl Seab 7:1–14Google Scholar
  105. Stienen EWM, van Beers PWM, Brenninkmeijer A, Habraken JMPM, Raaijmakers MHJE, van Tienen PGM (2000) Reflections of a specialist: patterns in food provisioning and foraging conditions in Sandwich Terns Sterna sandvicensis. Ardea 88:33–49Google Scholar
  106. Stillwell CE, Kohler NE (1982) Food, feeding habits, and estimates of daily ration of the shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) in the Northwest Atlantic. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39:407–414Google Scholar
  107. Stolyarov IA (1985) Dietary features of catfish, Silurus glanis, and pike-perch Stizostedion lucioperca, in Kyzlyarsk Bay, northern Caspian Sea. J Ichthyol 25:140–145Google Scholar
  108. Sund PN, Richards WJ (1967) Preliminary report on the feeding habits of tunas in the Gulf of Guinea. US Fish Wildl Serv Spec Sci Rep Fish 551:1–6Google Scholar
  109. Tomas J, Aznar FJ, Raga JA (2001) Feeding ecology of the loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta in the western Mediterranean. J Zool Lond 255:525–532. doi: 10.1017/S0952836901001613 Google Scholar
  110. United States National Museum (USNM) (1901) Cat. No. 126534. Smithsonian Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  111. USNM (1957) Cat. No. 223085. Smithsonian Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  112. USNM (1960) Cat. No. 223083. Smithsonian Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  113. USNM (No Date) Cat. No. 223090. Smithsonian Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  114. USNM (No Date) Unregistered. Smithsonian Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  115. van Damme CJG, Couperus AS (2008) Mass occurrence of snake pipefish in the Northeast Atlantic: result of a change in climate? J Sea Res 60:117–125Google Scholar
  116. Vandendriessche S, Messiaen M, O’Flynn S, Vincx M, Degraer S (2007) Hiding and feeding in floating seaweed: floating seaweed clumps as possible refuges or feeding grounds for fishes. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 71:691–703Google Scholar
  117. Vauk G, Jokele I (1975) Vorkkommen, Herkunft und Winternahrung Helgoländer Dreizehenmöwen (Rissa tridactyla). Veröff Inst Meeresforsch Bremerhav 15:69–77Google Scholar
  118. Vetchanin VI (1984) Feeding of the astrakhan shad, Alosa brasnikovi (Clupeidae), in the southeastern Caspian Sea. J Ichthyol 24:143–147Google Scholar
  119. Vincent ACJ, Berglund A, Ahnesjö I (1995) Reproductive ecology of five pipefish species in one eelgrass meadow. Env Biol Fish 44:347–361Google Scholar
  120. Vincent ACJ, Evans KL, Marsden AD (2005) Home range behaviour of the monogamous Australian seahorse, Hippocampus whitei. Env Biol Fish 72:1–12Google Scholar
  121. Wakefield E (2005) Seabird, marine mammal observations onboard the RSS Charles Darwin during British Geological Survey cruise CD174 in the Rockall Trough, August–September 2005. Report to the DTI as part of SEA7. British Antarctic Survey, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  122. Walters CJ, Martell SJD (2004) Fisheries ecology and management. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  123. Wanless S, Harris MP, Redman P, Speakman JR (2005) Low energy values of fish as a probable cause of a major seabird breeding failure in the North Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 294:1–8Google Scholar
  124. Whitley G, Allan J (1958) The sea-horse and its relatives. Georgian House, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  125. Wilson PC, Beckett JS (1970) Atlantic Ocean distribution of the pelagic stingray, Dasyatis violacea. Copeia 4:696–707Google Scholar
  126. Wood JB, Day C (2006) CephBase, version 06/2006. www.cephbase.utmb.edu. Accessed 15 April 2009
  127. Wu RSS (1984) The feeding habits of seven demersal fish species in a subtropical estuary. Asian Mar Biol 1:17–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Kleiber
    • 1
  • L. K. Blight
    • 1
    • 2
  • I. R. Caldwell
    • 1
  • A. C. J. Vincent
    • 1
  1. 1.Project Seahorse, Fisheries CentreThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Centre for Applied Conservation ResearchThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations