Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 9–31

Factors that contribute to the ecological risks of salmon and steelhead hatchery programs and some mitigating strategies



State and federal agencies in the United States annually release millions of hatchery salmon and steelhead into public waters. Many of the hatchery programs are located in areas where the wild populations are now listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) (16 U.S.C. §§ 1531–1544). These hatchery programs pose genetic and ecological risks to wild fish populations. Genetic risks occur when hatchery and wild fish interbreed and usually occur within a taxonomic species. Ecological risks occur when the presence of hatchery fish affects how wild fish interact with their environment or with other species and may affect whole species assemblages. This paper reviews some of the factors that contribute to ecological risks. Important contributing factors include the relative abundance of hatchery and wild fish in natural production areas, hatchery programs that increase density-dependant mortality, residual hatchery fish, some physical advantages that hatchery fish can have over wild fish, and life history characteristics that may make some species especially vulnerable to the effects of ecological risks. Many of these risk factors can be mitigated by management activities that reduce the level of interactions between hatchery and wild fish. This paper concludes by recommending twelve mitigation strategies that may be useful when agencies need to bring hatchery programs into compliance with the take provisions of the ESA.


Salmon Steelhead Hatchery Ecology Risk 


  1. Allen KR (1969) Limitations on production in salmonid populations in streams. In: Northcote TG (ed) Symposium on salmon and trout in streams. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, pp 3–18Google Scholar
  2. Araki H, Ardren WR, Olsen E, Cooper B, Blouin M (2006) Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood River. Conserv Biol 21:181–190Google Scholar
  3. Araki H, Cooper B, Blouin MS (2007) Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science 318:100–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrowman NJ, Myers RA, Hilborn R, Kehler DG, Field CA (2003) The variability among populations of coho salmon in the maximum reproductive rate and depensation. Ecol Appl 13:784–793Google Scholar
  5. Beamish RJ, Mahnken C, Neville CM (1997) Hatchery and wild production of Pacific salmon in relation to large-scale, natural shifts in the productivity of the marine environment. ICES J Mar Sci 54:1200–1215Google Scholar
  6. Berejikian B (1995) The effect of hatchery and wild ancestry and experience on the relative ability of steelhead trout fry (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to avoid a benthic predator. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:2476–2482Google Scholar
  7. Berejikian BA, Mathews SB, Quinn TP (1996) Effects of hatchery and wild ancestry and rearing environments on the development of agonistic behavior in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fry. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:2004–2014Google Scholar
  8. Berejikian BA, Tezak EP, Schroder SL, Flagg TA, Knudsen CM (1999) Competitive differences between newly emerged offspring of captive-reared and wild coho salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc 128:832–839Google Scholar
  9. Berg OK (1985) The formation of non-anadromous populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., in Europe. J Fish Biol 27:805–811Google Scholar
  10. Beverton RJH, Holt SJ (1954) On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. The Blackburn Press, NJGoogle Scholar
  11. Bigler BS, Welch DW, Helle JH (1996) A review of size trends among North Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:455–465Google Scholar
  12. Blankenship L, Brosnan D, Fleming I, McKinley S, Naish K, Secor D (2007) Review of atlantic salmon hatchery protocols, production, and product assessment. Sustainable Ecosystems Institute, Portland, OR, 91 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Blumm MC (2002) Sacrificing the salmon: a legal and policy history of the decline of Columbia Basin Salmon. Book World Publications Den Bosch, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  14. Bohlin T, Sundstrom LF, Johnsson JI, Hojesjo J, Pettersson J (2002) Density-dependent growth in brown trout: effects of introducing wild and hatchery fish. J Anim Ecol 71:683–692Google Scholar
  15. Brannas E (1995) First access to territorial space and exposure to strong predation pressure: a conflict in early emerging Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) fry. Evol Ecol 9:411–420Google Scholar
  16. Brannon EL, Amend DF, Cronin MA, Lannan JE, LaPatra S, McNeil WJ, Noble RE, Smith CE, Talbot AJ, Wedemeyer GA, Westers H (2004) The controversy about salmon hatcheries. Fisheries 29:12–31Google Scholar
  17. California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (2001) Final Report on Anadromous Salmonid Fish Hatcheries in California. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, 35 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Chandler GL, Bjornn TC (1988) Abundance, growth, and interactions of juvenile steelhead relative to time of emergence. Trans Am Fish Soc 117:432–443Google Scholar
  19. Chapman DW (1962) Aggressive behavior in juvenile coho salmon as a cause of emigration. J Fish Res Bd Can 19:1047–1080Google Scholar
  20. Chilcote MW (2003) Relationship between natural productivity and the frequency of wild fish in mixed spawning populations of wild and hatchery steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:1057–1067Google Scholar
  21. Collis K, Beaty RE, Crain BR (1995) Changes in catch rate and diet of northern squawfish associated with the release of hatchery-reared juvenile salmonids in a Columbia River reservoir. N Am J Fish Manage 15:346–357Google Scholar
  22. Cooney RT, Brodeur RD (1998) Carrying capacity and north Pacific salmon production: stock-enhancement implications. Bull Mar Sci 62:443–464Google Scholar
  23. Cushing DH (1973) Dependence of recruitment on parent stock. J Fish Res Bd Can 30:1965–1976Google Scholar
  24. Deverill JI, Adams CE, Bean CW (1999) Prior residence, aggression and territory acquisition in hatchery-reared and wild brown trout. J Fish Biol 55:868–875Google Scholar
  25. Dickhoff WW, Beckman BR, Larson DA, Mahnken C, Schreck CB, Sharp C, Zaugg WS (1995) Quality assessment of hatchery-reared spring chinook smolts in the Columbia River basin. Am Fish Soc Symp 15:292–302Google Scholar
  26. Eninum S, Fleming IA (2001) Implications of stocking: ecological interactions between wild and released salmonids. Nord J Freshw Res 75:56–70Google Scholar
  27. Evenson MD, Ewing RD (1992) Migration characteristics and hatchery returns of winter steelhead volitionally released from Cole River Hatchery, Oregon. N Am J Fish Manage 12:736–743Google Scholar
  28. Fenderson OC, Everhart WH, Muth KM (1968) Comparative agonistic and feeding behavior of hatchery-reared and wild salmon in aquaria. J Fish Res Bd Can 25:1–14Google Scholar
  29. Flagg TA, Waknitz FW, Maynard DJ, Milner GB, Mahnken CVW (1995) The effect of hatcheries on native coho salmon populations in the lower Columbia River. Am Fish Soc Symp 15:366–375Google Scholar
  30. Fleming IA (1998) Pattern and variability in the breeding system of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), with comparisons to other salmonids. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55(Supp 1):59–76Google Scholar
  31. Fleming IA, Hindar K, Mjolnerod IG, Johsson B, Balstad T, Lamberg A (2000) Lifetime success and interactions of farm salmon invading a native population. Royal Soc Lond 267:1517–1523Google Scholar
  32. Ford M (2002) Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conserv Biol 16:815–925Google Scholar
  33. Ford MJ, Fuss H, Boelts B, LaHood E, Hard J, Miller J (2006) Changes in run timing and natural smolt production in a naturally spawning coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) population after 60 years of intensive hatchery supplementation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:2343–2355Google Scholar
  34. Fresh KL (1997) The role of competition and predation in the decline of Pacific salmon and steelhead. In: Stouder DJ, Bisson PA, Naiman RJ (eds) Pacific salmon and their ecosystems: status and future options. Chapman and Hall, NY, pp 245–275Google Scholar
  35. Gebhards SV (1960) Biological notes on precocious male Chinook salmon parr in the Salmon River drainage, Idaho. Prog Fish-Culturist 22:121–123Google Scholar
  36. Gee AS, Milner NJ, Hernsworth RJ (1978) The effect of density on mortality in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). J Anim Ecol 47:497–505Google Scholar
  37. Good TP, Waples RS, Adams P (2005) Updated status of federally listed ESUs of West Coast salmon and steelhead. U.S. Dept. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-66, 597 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Groot C, Margolis L (1991) Pacific salmon life histories. UBC Press, Vancouver, BCGoogle Scholar
  39. Gross MR (1998) One species with two biologies: Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the wild and in aquaculture. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55(Supp 1):131–144Google Scholar
  40. Hargreaves NB, LeBrasseur RJ (1986) Size selectivity of coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) preying on juvenile chum (O. keta) salmon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:581–586Google Scholar
  41. Hawkins SW, Tipping JM (1999) Predation by juvenile hatchery salmonids on wild fall Chinook salmon fry in the Lewis River, Washington. California Fish Game 85:124–129Google Scholar
  42. Heard WR (1998) Do hatchery salmon affect the North Pacific Ocean ecosystem? N Pac Anadr Fish Comm Bull No 1:405–411Google Scholar
  43. Helle JH, Hoffman MS (1995) Size decline and older age at maturity of two chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) stocks in western North America, 1972–92. In: Beamish RJ (ed) Climate change and northern fish populations. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 121:245–260Google Scholar
  44. Hilborn R, Eggers D (2000) A review of the hatchery programs for pink salmon in Prince William Sound and Kodiak Island, Alaska. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:333–350Google Scholar
  45. Hilborn R, Walters CJ (1992) Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: choice, dynamics, and uncertainty. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  46. Hill MS, Zydlewski GB, Gale WL (2006) Comparisons between hatchery and wild steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) smolts: physiology and habitat use. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:1627–1638Google Scholar
  47. Hindar K, Ryman N, Utter F (1991) Genetic effects of cultured fish on natural fish populations. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:945–957Google Scholar
  48. Holtby LB, Swain DP, Allan GM (1993) Mirror-elicited agonistic behaviour and body morphology as predictors of dominance status in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:676–684Google Scholar
  49. Hume JMB, Parkinson EA (1987) Effect of stocking density on the survival, growth and dispersal of steelhead trout fry (Salmo gairdneri). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44:271–281Google Scholar
  50. Hunter JG (1959) Survival and production of pink and chum salmon in a coastal stream. J Fish Res Bd Can 16:835–886Google Scholar
  51. Huntingford FA, de Leaniz CG (1997) Social dominance, prior residence and the acquisition of profitable feeding sties in juvenile Atlantic salmon. J Fish Biol 51:1009–1014Google Scholar
  52. Huntingford FA, Metcalfe NB, Thorpe JE, Graham WD, Adams CE (1990) Social dominance and body size in Atlantic salmon parr, Salmo salar L. J Fish Biol 36:877–881Google Scholar
  53. Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) (2008) Fish Stocking Information. Available at
  54. Johnsson JI, Hojesjo J, Fleming IA (2001) Behavioural and heart rate responses to predation risk in wild and domesticated Atlantic salmon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:788–794Google Scholar
  55. Keeley ER (2000) An experimental analysis of territory size in juvenile steelhead trout. Anim Behav 59:477–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Keeley ER (2001) Demographic responses to food and space competition by juvenile steelhead trout. Ecology 82:1247–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Keliher P (2004) 2004 Annual Report of the Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission. Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission, Augusta, ME, 72 ppGoogle Scholar
  58. Kostow K (1995) Biennial report on the status of wild fish in Oregon. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland, OR, 272 ppGoogle Scholar
  59. Kostow K (1997) The status of salmon and steelhead in Oregon. In: Stouder DJ, Bisson PA, Naiman RJ (eds) Pacific salmon and their ecosystems: status and future options. Chapman and Hall, NY, pp 145–178Google Scholar
  60. Kostow K (2003) Factors that influence Evolutionarily Significant Unit boundaries and status assessment in a highly polymorphic species, Oncorhynchus mykiss, in the Columbia River. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Information Report No. 2003-04. Clackamas, OR, 122 ppGoogle Scholar
  61. Kostow KE (2004) Differences in juvenile phenotypes and survival between hatchery stocks and a natural population provide evidence for modified selection due to captive breeding. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:577–589Google Scholar
  62. Kostow KE, Zhou S (2006) The effect of an introduced summer steelhead hatchery stock on the productivity of a wild winter steelhead population. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:825–841Google Scholar
  63. Kostow KE, Marshall AR, Phelps SR (2003) Naturally spawning hatchery steelhead contribute to smolt production but experience low reproductive success. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:780–790Google Scholar
  64. Knudsen CM, Schroder SL, Busack CA, Johnston MV, Pearsons TN, Bosch WJ, Fast DE (2006) Comparison of life history traits between first-generation hatchery and wild upper Yakima River spring Chinook salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:1130–1144Google Scholar
  65. Larkin PA (1977) An epitaph for the concept of Maximum Sustained Yield. Trans Am Fish Soc 106:1–11Google Scholar
  66. Leider S, Chilcote MW, Loch JJ (1984) Spawning characteristics of sympatric populations of steelhead trout (Salmo gairdneri): evidence for partial reproductive isolation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41:1454–1462Google Scholar
  67. Levin PS, Williams JG (2002) Interspecific effects of artifically propagated fish: an additional conservation risk for salmon. Conserv Biol 16:1581–1587Google Scholar
  68. Levin PS, Zabel RW, Williams JG (2001) The road to extinction is paved with good intentions: negative association of fish hatcheries with threatened salmon. Proc R Soc Lond 268:1153–1158Google Scholar
  69. Lichatowich J (1999) Salmon without rivers: a history of the Pacific Salmon crisis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  70. Lynch M, O’Hely M (2001) Captive breeding and the genetic fitness of natural populations. Conserv Genet 2:363–378Google Scholar
  71. Mackey G, McLean JE, Quinn TP (2001) Comparisons of run timing, spatial distribution and length of wild and newly established hatchery populations of steelhead in Forks Creek, Washington. N Am J Fish Manage 21:717–724Google Scholar
  72. MacLean A, Metcalfe NB, Mitchell D (2000) Alternative competitive strategies in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): evidence from fish damage. Aquaculture 184:291–302Google Scholar
  73. Mahnken C, Prentice E, Waknitz W, Sims MG, Williams J (1982) The application of recent smoltification research to public hatchery releases: an assessment of size/time requirements for Columbia River hatchery coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Aquaculture 28:251–268Google Scholar
  74. Marschall EA, Quinn TP, Roff DA, Hutchings JA, Metcalfe NB, Bakke TA, Saunders RL, Poff NL (1998) A framework for understanding Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) life history. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55(Supp 1):48–58Google Scholar
  75. McGinnity P, Prodohl P, Ferguson A, Hynes R, Maoileidgh NO, Baker N, Cotter D, O’Hea B, Cooke D, Rogan G, Taggart J, Cross T (2003) Fitness reduction and potential extinction of wild populations of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, as a result of interactions with escaped farm salmon. Proc R Soc Lond 270:2443–2450Google Scholar
  76. McLean JE, Bentzen P, Quinn TP (2004) Differential reproductive success of sympatric, naturally spawning hatchery and wild steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Environ Biol Fish 69:359–369Google Scholar
  77. McMichael GA, Sharpe CS, Pearsons TN (1997) Effects of residual hatchery-reared steelhead on growth of wild rainbow trout and spring Chinook salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:230–239Google Scholar
  78. McMichael GA, Pearsons TN, Leider SA (1999) Behavioral interactions among hatchery-reared steelhead smolts and wild Oncorhynchus mykiss in natural streams. N Am J Fish Manage 19:948–956Google Scholar
  79. McMichael GA, Pearsons TN, Leider SA (2000) Minimizing ecological impacts of hatchery-reared juvenile steelhead trout on wild salmonids in a Yakima basin watershed. In: Knudsen EE, Steward CR, MacDonald DD, Williams JE, Reiser DW (eds) Sustainable fisheries management: Pacific Salmon. Lewis Publishers, NY, pp 365–380Google Scholar
  80. Mesa MG (1991) Variation in feeding, aggression and position choice between hatchery and wild cutthroat in an artificial stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 120:723–727Google Scholar
  81. Mobrand LE (2008) Ecosystem diagnosis and treatment (EDT). Available at
  82. Mobrand LE, Barr J, Blankenship L, Campton DE, Evelyn TTP, Flagg TA, Mahnken CVW, Seeb LW, Seidel PR, Smoker WW (2005) Hatchery reform in Washington State: principles and emerging issues. Fisheries 30:11–23Google Scholar
  83. Moffett IJJ, Allen N, Flanagan C, Crozier WW, Kennedy GJA (2006) Fecundity, egg size and early hatchery survival for wild Atlantic salmon from the River Bush. Fish Manage Ecol 13:73–79Google Scholar
  84. Moring JR, Marancik J, Griffiths F (1995) Changes in stocking strategies for Atlantic salmon restoration and rehabilitation in Maine, 1871–1993. Am Fish Soc Symp 15:38–51Google Scholar
  85. Mullan JW, Rockhold A, Chrisman CR (1992) Life histories and precocity of chinook salmon in the mid-Columbia River. Prog Fish-Culturist 54:25–28Google Scholar
  86. Myers JM, Kope RG, Bryant GJ, Teel D, Lierheimer LJ, Wainwright TC, Grant WS, Waknitz FW, Neely K, Lindley ST, Waples RS (1998) Status review of Chinook salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon and California. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-35, Seattle, WA, 443 ppGoogle Scholar
  87. Myers RA, Levin SA, Lande R, James FC, Murdoch WW, Paines RT (2004) Hatcheries and endangered salmon. Science 303:1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Nielsen JL (1994) Invasive cohorts: impacts of hatchery-reared coho salmon on the trophic, developmental, and genetic ecology of wild stocks. In: Stouder DJ, Fresh KL, Feller R (eds) Theory and application in fish feeding ecology. USC Belle Baruch Press, Columbia, pp 361–385Google Scholar
  89. Nickelson T (2003) The influence of hatchery coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) on the productivity of wild coho salmon populations in Oregon coastal basins. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:1050–1056Google Scholar
  90. Nickelson TE, Solazzi MF, Johnson SL (1986) Use of hatchery coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) presmolts to rebuild wild populations in Oregon coastal streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:2443–2449Google Scholar
  91. NOAA Fisheries (2008a) ESA salmon listings. Available at
  92. NOAA Fisheries (2008b) Columbia River Hatchery Reform Project. Available at
  93. Noakes DJ, Beamish RJ, Sweeting R, King J (2000) Changing the balance: interactions between hatchery and wild Pacific coho salmon in the presence of regime shifts. N Pac Anadr Fish Comm Bull No 2:155–163Google Scholar
  94. Oregon Department of Fish, Wildlife (ODFW) (2006) Fish Propagation Report for 2005. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Salem, OR, 114 ppGoogle Scholar
  95. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (1996) Operation plans for anadromous fish production facilities in the Columbia River Basin, vol II, Oregon. Bonneville Power Administration, Portland OR, 365 ppGoogle Scholar
  96. Parker RR (1971) Size selective predation among juvenile salmonid fishes in a British Columbia inlet. J Fish Res Bd Can 28:1503–1510Google Scholar
  97. Pearsons TN, Fritts AL (1999) Maximum size of Chinook salmon consumed by juvenile coho salmon. N Am J Fish Manage 19:165–170Google Scholar
  98. Pearsons TN, Fritts AL, Scott JL (2007) The effects of hatchery domestication on competitive dominance of juvenile spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:803–812Google Scholar
  99. Peery CA, Bjornn TC (2004) Interactions between natural and hatchery Chinook salmon parr in a laboratory stream channel. Fish Res 66:311–324Google Scholar
  100. Pepper VA, Oliver NP, Blundon R (1985) Evaluation of an experiment in Lacustrine rearing of juvenile anadromous Atlantic salmon. N Am J Fish Manage 5:507–525Google Scholar
  101. Peterman RM (1991) Density-dependent marine processes in North Pacific salmonids: lessons for experimental design of large-scale manipulations of fish stocks. ICES Mar Sci Symp 192:69–77Google Scholar
  102. Reinhardt UG, Yamamoto T, Nakano S (2001) Effects of body size and predators on intracohort competition in wild and domesticated juvenile salmon in a stream. Eco Res 16:327–334Google Scholar
  103. Reisenbichler RR, McIntyre JD (1977) Genetic differences in growth and survival of juvenile hatchery and wild steelhead trout, Salmo gairdneri. J Fish Res Bd Can 34:123–128Google Scholar
  104. Reisenbichler RR, Rubin SP (1999) Genetic changes from artificial propagation of Pacific salmon affect the productivity and viability of supplemented populations. ICES J Mar Sci 56:459–466Google Scholar
  105. Reisenbichler RR, Rubin S, Wetzel L, Phelps S (2004) Natural Selection after release from a hatchery leads to domestication in steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss. In: Leber KM, Kitada S, Blankenship HL, Svasand T (eds) Stock enhancement and sea ranching. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 371–383Google Scholar
  106. Reynolds JD, Freckleton RP (2005) Population dynamics: growing to extremes. Science 309:567–568PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Rhodes JS, Quinn TP (1998) Factors affecting the outcome of territorial contests between hatchery and naturally reared coho salmon parr in the laboratory. J Fish Biol 53:1220–1230Google Scholar
  108. Rhodes JS, Quinn TP (1999) Comparative performance of genetically similar hatchery and naturally reared juvenile coho salmon in streams. N Am J Fish Mang 19:670–677Google Scholar
  109. Ricker WE (1975) Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fish Res Bd Can Bull 191Google Scholar
  110. Ruggerone GT, Goetz FA (2004) Survival of Puget Sound chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in response to climate-induced competition with pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:1756–1770Google Scholar
  111. Ruggerone GT, Nielsen JL (2004) Evidence for competitive dominance of pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) over other salmonids in the North Pacific Ocean. Rev Fish Biol Fish 14:371–390Google Scholar
  112. Ruggerone GT, Rogers DE (1992) Predation on sockeye salmon fry by juvenile coho salmon in the Chingnik Lakes, Alaska: implications for salmon management. N Am J Fish Manage 12:87–102Google Scholar
  113. Ruggerone GT, Zimmermann M, Myers KW, Nielsen JL, Rogers DE (2003) Competition between Asian pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and Alaskan sockeye salmon (O. nerka) in the North Pacific Ocean. Fish Oceanogr 12:209–219Google Scholar
  114. Ruggerone GT, Farley E, Nielsen J, Hagen P (2005) Seasonal marine growth of Bristol Bay sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in relation to competition with Asian pink salmon (O. gorbuscha) and the 1977 ocean regime shift. Fish Bull 103:355–370Google Scholar
  115. Schmitten R, Stelle W, Jones RP (1995) Proposed recovery plan for snake river salmon. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Seattle, WA, 466 ppGoogle Scholar
  116. Sibly RM, Barker D, Denham MC, Hone J, Pagel M (2005) On the Regulation of populations of mammals, birds, fish, and insects. Science 309:607–610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Slaney TL, McPhail JD, Radford D, Birch GJ (1985) Review of the effects of enhancement strategies on interactions among juvenile salmonids. Can MS Rep Fish Aquat Sci 1852:72Google Scholar
  118. Solazzi MF, Nickelson TE , Johnson SL, Rodgers JD (1999) Final report: development and evaluation of techniques to rehabilitate Oregon’s wild salmonids: Study 1 evaluation of the STEP Hatchbox (fry release) Program Study. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Corvallis OR, 9 ppGoogle Scholar
  119. Swain DP, Riddell BE (1990) Variation in agonistic behavior between newly emerged juveniles from hatchery and wild populations of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:566–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Tipping JM, Cooper RV, Byrne JB, Johnson TH (1995) Length and condition factor of migrating and nonmigrating hatchery-reared winter steelhead smolts. Prog Fish-Culturist 57:120–123Google Scholar
  121. United States Atlantic Salmon Assessment Committee (USASAC) (2005) Annual Report of the U.S. Atlantic Salmon Assessment Committee. Annual Report No. 17. North Atlantic Salmon Conservation Organization (NASCO). Woods Hole, MA, 118 ppGoogle Scholar
  122. United States Fish, Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2006) Warm Springs National Fish Hatchery Assessments and Recommendations, Final Report. US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region, Portland, OR, 44 ppGoogle Scholar
  123. United States Fish, Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2007a) Leavenworth, Entiat and Winthrop National Fish Hatcheries Assessments and Recommendations, Final Report. US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region, Portland, OR, 141 ppGoogle Scholar
  124. United States Fish, Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2007b) Eagle Creek National Fish Hatchery Assessments and Recommendations, Final Report. US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region, Portland, OR, 89 ppGoogle Scholar
  125. United States Fish, Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2007c) Carson, Spring Creek, Little White Salmon and Willard National Fish Hatcheries Assessments and Recommendations, Final Report. US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region, Portland, OR, 149 ppGoogle Scholar
  126. United States Fish, Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2008) Proposed process for US Fish and Wildlife Service review of national fish hatcheries in the Columbia Basin. Available at
  127. Viola AE, Schuck ML (1995) A method to reduce the abundance of residual hatchery steelhead in rivers. N Am J Fish Manage 15:488–493Google Scholar
  128. Wagner HH (1967) A summary of investigations of the use of hatchery-reared steelhead in the management of a sports fishery. Oregon Game Commission Research Report No. 5, Corvallis, OR, 62 ppGoogle Scholar
  129. Wagner HH, Wallace RL, Campbell HJ (1963) The seaward migration and return of hatchery-reared steelhead trout Salmo gairdneri Richardson, in the Alsea River, Oregon. Trans Am Fish Soc 92:202–210Google Scholar
  130. Wallis J (1963) An evaluation of Oregon salmon hatcheries. Report series published by The Oregon Fish Commission, Clackamas, OR, 997 ppGoogle Scholar
  131. Waples RS (1991) Genetic interactions between hatchery and wild salmonids: lessons from the Pacific Northwest. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:124–133Google Scholar
  132. Ward BR, Slaney PA (1993) Egg-to-smolt survival and fry-to-smolt density dependence of Keogh River steelhead trout. In: Gibson RJ, Cutting RE (eds) Production of juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, in natural waters. Can Spec Pub Fish Aquat Sci No 118:209–217Google Scholar
  133. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) (2008) WDFW Hatchery System Evaluation. Available at
  134. Weitkamp LA, Wainwright TC, Bryant GJ, Milner GB, Teel DJ, Kope RG, Waples RS (1995) Status review of coho salmon from Washington, Oregon and California. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-24, Seattle, WA, 258 ppGoogle Scholar
  135. Weber ED, Fausch KD (2003) Interactions between hatchery and wild salmonids in streams: differences in biology and evidence for competition. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:1018–1036Google Scholar
  136. White B (2007) Alaska Salmon Enhancement Program, 2006 Annual Report. Fishery Management Report No. 07-04. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Juneau, AK, 47 ppGoogle Scholar
  137. Wright S (1993) Fishery management of wild salmon stocks to prevent extinction. Fisheries 18:3–4Google Scholar
  138. Zaporozhets OM, Zaporozhets GV (2004) Interaction between hatchery and wild Pacific salmon in the Far East of Russia: a review. Rev Fish Biol Fish 14:305–319Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oregon Department of Fish and WildlifeClackamasUSA

Personalised recommendations