Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 17–31 | Cite as

Gear technology in Nephrops trawl fisheries

  • T. L. Catchpole
  • A. S. Revill
Research Paper


Nets with a small mesh size are required to catch Nephrops norvegicus, consequently large quantities of small whitefish are also caught, and much of this bycatch is undersized and is discarded dead. The main bycatch species are whiting (Merlangius merlangus), haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) and cod (Gadus morhua). Here we summarize the known behavioural reactions of these species towards conventional trawls and review the results of using different trawl modifications to increase selectivity of Nephrops trawls. The trawl modifications are categorised as separator grids, separator and guiding panels, square-mesh panels, capture avoidance designs and codend modification. Finally, the extent to which these developments have been legislated for is discussed including the conditions under which new gear regulations have been introduced.

Haddock and whiting rise during the trawling process facilitating their separation from Nephrops and escape, however the behaviour of small fish of these species is less consistent. Cod and Nephrops remain on bottom of the trawl, so to separate these species requires some physical filtering process. Overall, there is currently sufficient technical ability to improve selectivity in Nephrops trawls. The design of choice is dependent on the objectives of managers; for reducing discards but retaining marketable fish, square-mesh panels offer the most useful tool; to eliminate all bycatch and create a single-species fishery, grids and traditional Nephrops trawls show most potential. Whatever the objectives of the new measures, it is likely that a short-term economic impact will follow, and some form of incentive may be required to implement effective measures. A voluntary uptake of new measures by industry is preferable, however, to date, restrictions on fishing opportunities have been necessary to introduce innovative gear designs.


Nephrops Trawl Fish behaviour Gear technology 


  1. Alverson DL, Freeberg MH, Murawski SA, Pope JG (1994) A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards. FAO fisheries technical paper, Rome, FAO, ROME, 339Google Scholar
  2. Anon. (1999) STOA study—The problem of discards in fisheries, STOA—The European Parliament, No. EP/IV/B/STOA/98/17/01Google Scholar
  3. Anon. (2000) Cruise report of Irish Sea mesh trials mfv ‘Northern Dawn’ 23rd May–22nd July 2000. BIM Internal Report. In: Graham N, Ferro RST (2004) (eds) The Nephrops fisheries of the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean—A review and assessment of fishing gear design. ICES Coop. Res. Rep. No. 270, ICES, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  4. Arkley K (1990) Fishing trials to evaluate the use of square mesh selector panels fitted to Nephrops trawls—MFVHeather Sprig (BCK 181) November/December 1990, SFIA, Seafish Report, 383Google Scholar
  5. Arkley K (1993) Improvement of selectivity of demersal trawl gear—Positioning of square mesh panels in Nephrops trawls, SFIA, Seafish Report, 422Google Scholar
  6. Arkley K (2001) Improving selectivity in towed fishing gears—Guidelines on the rigging of square mesh panels, July 2001, Seafish, HullGoogle Scholar
  7. Arkley K, Dunlin G (2002) Improving the selectivity in towed gears—Further investigations into the use of low diameter twines for the construction of square mesh panels, Sea Fish Industry Authority, Hull, Seafish Report SR544Google Scholar
  8. Armstrong M, Briggs R, Rihan D (1998) A study of optimum positioning of square-mesh escape panels in Irish Sea Nephrops trawls. Fisheries Res 34:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashcroft B (1983) Trials of prawn/fish separator trawl and survey of new prawn grounds in south cebtral North Sea ICES area IVb, SFIA, Technical Report, 230Google Scholar
  10. Bergmann M, Wieczorek SK, Moore PG, Atkinson RJA (2002) Discards composition of the Nephrops fishery in the Clyde Sea area, Scotland. Fisheries Res 57:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. BIM (2005a) NECESSITY—The effect of a 4-panel inclined separator panel on the selectivity of a standard Nephrops trawl. BIM, SFIA, Co., DublinGoogle Scholar
  12. BIM (2005b) NECESSITY—The effect of an inclined separator panel on the selectivity of a standard Nephrops trawl and their use in the Smalls. BIM, SFIA, Co., DublinGoogle Scholar
  13. BIM (2005c) SELECTIVITY—The effect of an inclined separator panel on the selectivity of a standard Nephrops trawl and their use in the Irish Sea. BIM, Co., DublinGoogle Scholar
  14. Briggs RP (1986) A general review of mesh selection for Nephrops norvegicus (L.). Fisheries Res 4:59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Briggs RP (1991) Whiting conservation in the Northern Ireland Nephrops fishery: ICES CM1991/B:1997Google Scholar
  16. Briggs R (1992) An assessment of nets with a square mesh panel as a whiting conservation tool in the Irish Sea Nephrops fishery. Fisheries Res 13:133–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Briggs RP, Robertson JHB (1993) Square mesh panel studies in the Irish Sea, ICES CM1993/B:20Google Scholar
  18. Briggs RP, Armstrong MJ, Rihan D (1999) The consequences of an increase in mesh size in the Irish Sea Nephrops fishery: an experimental approach. Fisheries Res 40:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Broadhurst M, Kennelly S (1996) Effects of the circumference of codends and a new design of square mesh panel in reducing unwanted bycatch in the New South Wales oceanic prawn-trawl fishery, Australia. Fisheries Res 27:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Campos A, Fonseca P, Wileman D (1996) Experiments with sorting panels and square mesh windows in the Portuguese crustacean fishery, ICES CM 1996/B:15Google Scholar
  21. Catchpole T (2005) A multidisciplinary study of discarding in North Sea fisheries. School of Marine Science and Technology and School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle-upon-TyneGoogle Scholar
  22. Catchpole TL, Frid CLJ, Gray TS (2005a) Discarding in the English north-east Nephrops norvegicus fishery: the role of social and environmental factors. Fisheries Res 72:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Catchpole TL, Frid CLJ, Gray TS (2005b) Discards in North Sea Fisheries: causes, consequences and solutions. Marine Policy 29:421–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Catchpole TL, Frid CLJ, Gray TS (2006a) Resolving the discard problem—A case study of the English Nephrops fishery. Marine Policy 30:821–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Catchpole TL, Revill AS, Dunlin G (2006b) An assessment of the Swedish grid and square mesh codend in the English (Farn Deeps) Nephrops fishery. Fisheries Res 81:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cole H, Simpson A (1965) Selection by trawl nets in the Nephrops fishery. Rapp P-V Cons Perm Int Explor Mer 156:2003–2205Google Scholar
  27. Cook R (2001) The magnitude and impact of by-catch mortality by fishing gear Reykjavik Conference on Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem, Reykjavik, Iceland 1–4 October 2001Google Scholar
  28. Douglas RH, Hawryshyn CW (1990) Behavioural studies of fish vision: an analysis of visual capabilities. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Dunlin G (1999) Evaluation of by-catch reduction devices in UK Nephrops fisheries—The use of separator trawls in the Irish Sea, SFIA, Seafish Report 522Google Scholar
  30. Dunlin G, Reese R (2003) Financial instrument for fisheries guidance (FIFG) project, An industry centred conservation project—Commercial proving trials of a new prawn trawl design, SFIA, Seafish Report, 551Google Scholar
  31. Evans SM, Hunter JE, Elizal, Wahju RI (1994) Composition and fate of the catch and bycatch in the Farne Deep (North Sea) Nephrops fishery. ICES J Marine Sci 51:155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. FRS (2000) Gear Work Funded by SEERAD and Industry/Science Partnership-3. Effect of Lifting Bag and Mesh Size, Aberdeen, Fisheries Research ServicesGoogle Scholar
  33. FRS (2002) Report of Scottish trials assessing the selectivity of trawls and seines. Fisheries Research Services, Industry/Science Partnership 2001–2002, vol I, AberdeenGoogle Scholar
  34. Galbraith R (1991) Separator trawl trials with fishing vessels Comrade and Sovereign—North Minch—October 1990, Report of a joint venture between the Western Isles Islands Council and the Marine Laboratory, Fisheries Research Report, 1/91Google Scholar
  35. Glass CW, Wardle CS (1989) Comparison of the reactions of fish to a trawl gear, at high and low light intensities. Fisheries Res 7:249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Glass CW, Wardle CS, Gosden SJ (1993) Behavioural studies of the principles underlying mesh penetration by fish. In: Wardle CS, Hollingworth CE (eds) Fish behaviour in relation to fishing operations—Selected papers from a Symposium held in Bergen, 11–13 June 1992. ICES Marine Sci Symp 196:92–97Google Scholar
  37. Glass CW, Wardle CS, Gosden SJ, Racey DN (1995) Studies on the use of visual stimuli to control fish escape from codends. I. Laboratory studies on the effect of a black tunnel on mesh penetration. Fisheries Res 23:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Graham N, Ferro RST (2004) The Nephrops fisheries of the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean—A review and assessment of fishing gear design. ICES Coop Res Rep No. 270. ICES, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  39. Graham N, Fryer RJ (2006) Separation of fish from Nephrops norvegicus into a two tier cod-end using a selection grid. Fisheries Res 82:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hillis J (1983) Experiment with a double codend Nephrops trawl, ICES CM 1983/B29Google Scholar
  41. Hillis J (1984) Further experiments with adouble codend Nephrops trawl, ICES CM 1984/K:36Google Scholar
  42. Hillis J (1985) Some observations on the separation of Nephrops from whiting and other fish by separator trawls, ICES CM 1985/B:47Google Scholar
  43. Hillis J (1989) Further separator trawl experiments on Nephrops and whiting, ICES CM 1989/B:46Google Scholar
  44. Hillis J, Earley J (1982) Selectivity in the Nephrops trawl, ICES CM 1982/B:19Google Scholar
  45. Hillis J, McCormick R, Rihan D, Geary M (1991) Square mesh experiments in the Irish Sea, ICES CM 1991/B:58Google Scholar
  46. ICES (2003) Report of the ICES-FAO working group on fishing technology and fish behaviour, Fisheries Technology Committee, Bergen, Norway, 27–28 June 2003, ICES CM2003/B:07Google Scholar
  47. ICES (2004) Study Group on Discard and By-catch Information. ICES J Cotter (Chair)Google Scholar
  48. Jones EG, Fryer R, Kynoch R, Summerbell K (2004) Working document: The influence of twine colour and contrast on the effectiveness of square mesh panels in a demersal whitefish trawl. In: 2. The reaction and behaviour of fish to visual components of fishing gears and the effect of catchability in survey and commercial situations. ICES WGFTFB Working Paper, 20–23 April 2004, Gdynia, Poland, pp 100–110Google Scholar
  49. Kim YH, Wardle CS (2003) Optomotor response and erratic response: quantitative analysis of fish reaction to towed fishing gears. Fisheries Res 60:455–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Larsvik M, Ulmestrand M (1992) Square and diamond mesh trawl codend selection on Nephrops norvegicus (L.), analyzed with the curve-fit method isotoic regression, ICES CM 1992/B:36Google Scholar
  51. Loaec H, Morandeau F, Meillat M, Davies P (2006) Engineering development of flexible selective grids for Nephrops. Fisheries Res 79:210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Madsen N, Moth-Poulsen T (1994) Measurement of the selectivity of Nephrops and demersal roundfish species in conventional and square mesh panel codends in the northern North Sea, ICES 1994/B:14Google Scholar
  53. Madsen N, Moth-Poulsen T, Holst R, Wileman D (1999) Selectivity experiments with escape windows in the North Sea Nephrops (Nephrops norvegicus) trawl fishery. Fisheries Res 42:167–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Main J, Sangster G (1982) A study of separating fish from Nephrops norvegicus in a bottom trawl, DAFS, MAFF, Scottish Fisheries Research Report, 24Google Scholar
  55. Main J, Sangster G (1985a) The behaviour of the Norway lobster, Nephrops norvegicus, during trawling, DAFS, MAFF, Scottish Fisheries Research report, 34Google Scholar
  56. Main J, Sangster G (1985b) Trawling experiments with a two-level net to minimise the undersized gadoid bycatch in a Nephrops fishery. Fisheries Res 3:131–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Main J, Sangster G (1986) Are separator trawls effective? DAFS, MAFF, Scottish Fisheries Bull 49Google Scholar
  58. Margetts A (1963) Escapes of fish through the component parts of trawls. Spec Publ Int Comm NW Atlant Fish 5:158–165Google Scholar
  59. Newland P (1989) The swimming and orientation behaviour of the Norway lobster, Nephrops norvegicus (L.), in relation to trawling. Fisheries Res 8:63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Polet H, Redant F (1994) Selectivity experiments in the Belgian Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) fishery, ICES CM 1994/B:39Google Scholar
  61. Radcliffe CCS (2001) Nephrops trawl reduction using activating selection grids FAIR CT–98–4164. University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NewcastleGoogle Scholar
  62. Redant F, Polet H (1994) Introduction on the finfish by-catches and discards in the Belgian Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) fishery, ICES CM1994/G:29Google Scholar
  63. Revill A (2005) Maintaining a watching brief on global developments in the field of environmentally friendly fishing methods—Report on a short visit to Sweden to gather information on the grid used in the Swedish Nephrops fishery. Defra, R&D Project M0738: Work Package 3Google Scholar
  64. Revill AS, Catchpole TL, Dunlin G (2006a) Recent work to improve the efficacy of square-mesh panels used in a North Sea Nephrops norwegicus directed fishery (in press)Google Scholar
  65. Revill AS, Dunlin G, Holst R (2006b) Selective properties of the cutaway trawl and several other commercial trawls used in the Farne Deeps North Sea Nephrops fishery. Fisheries Res 81:268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rihan DJ, McDonnell J (2003) Protecting spawning cod in the Irish Sea through the use of inclined separator panels in Nephrops trawls, ICES CM2003/Z:02Google Scholar
  67. Robertsen J (1983) Square mesh cod-end selectivity experiments on whiting (Merlangius merlangus) and haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), ICES CM1983 (collected papers)Google Scholar
  68. Robertson JHB, Ferro RST (1993) Selectivity of Nephrops Trawls. Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen, Scotland. Fisheries Research Services Report No. 1/93Google Scholar
  69. Robertson J, Shanks A (1989) Further studies of the size selection of Nephrops by different codends, DAFS, MAFF, Scottish Fisheries Working Paper, 1/89Google Scholar
  70. Robertson J, Shanks A (1994a) Analysis of fishing trials, using the twin trawl system, of nets with windows of square mesh, SOAFD, MAFF, Scottish Fisheries Working Paper, 2/94Google Scholar
  71. Robertson J, Shanks AM (1997) Experiments with rigid grids in the Nephrops and whitefish fisheries, Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen Report, 4/97Google Scholar
  72. Robertson JHB, Shanks AM (1994b) The effect on catches of Nephrops, haddock and whiting of square mesh window position in a Nephrops trawl, ICES CM1994/B:32Google Scholar
  73. Robertson JHB, Stewart PAM (1988) A comparison of size selection of haddock and whiting by square and diamond mesh codends. ICES J Marine Sci 44:148–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Robertson J, Emslie D, Ballantyne K, Chapman CJ (1986) Square and diamond mesh trawl codend selection trials on Nephrops norvegicus, ICES CM 1986:B:12Google Scholar
  75. Rochet M, Peronnet I, Trenkel V (2002) An analysis of discards from the French Trawler fleet in the Celtic Sea. ICES J Marine Sci 59:538–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sangster G, Main J, Shanks AM (1990) Twin trawling trials to obtain catch comparison data between a standard dual purpose fish/prawn net and the same net fitted with a separator panel, DAFS, MAFF, Scottish Fisheries Working Paper 4/90Google Scholar
  77. Sangster G, Bova D, Kynoch R (2003) Initial results from a modified separator trawl, abstracted in: ICES, 2003. Report of the ICES-FAO working group on fishing technology and fish behaviour, Fisheries Technology Committee, Bergen, Norway, 27–28 June 2003, ICES CM2003/B:07Google Scholar
  78. SFIA (1985) Commercial application of separator panels in Nephrops trawls, ICES CM1985/B:3Google Scholar
  79. Symonds D, Simpson A (1971) Preliminary report on a specially designed Nephrops trawl for releasing undersized fish, ICES CM 1971/B:6Google Scholar
  80. Thomas H (1965) The whitefish communities associated with Nephrops norvegicus (L.) and the bycatch of whitefish in the Norway Lobster Fishery, together with notes on Norway lobster predators. Rapp P-V Cons Perm Int Explor Mer 156:158–165Google Scholar
  81. Thorsteinsson G (1991) Experiments with square mesh windows in the Nephrops trawling off south-Iceland, ICES CM 1991/B:3Google Scholar
  82. Ulmestrand M, Larsson P (1991) Experiments with square mesh window in the top panel of a Nephrops trawl. ICES CM 1991/B:50Google Scholar
  83. Ulmestrand M, Valentinsson D (2003) Sea trials with species-sorting grid installed in Nephrops trawls. Institute of Marine Research, Sweden, LysekilGoogle Scholar
  84. Valdemarsen JW (1997) Trawling of Nephrops—the triple-trawl technique. By catches of fish and selection devices. Fishing trials in the North Sea with M/S “Michael Sars” in 1995–96. Fisken og Havet 16:40Google Scholar
  85. Valentinsson D, Ulmestrand M (2005) Mandatory use of species-selective grids in the Swedish Nephrops trawl fishery on national waters—Experiences after one year with new regulations. Institute of Marine Research, Sweden, LysekilGoogle Scholar
  86. Valdermarsen J, Ulmestrand M, West C (1996) Experiments on size-selectivity for Norway Lobster using sorting grids in the aft trawl belly. ICES grid study groupGoogle Scholar
  87. Wardle CS (1983) Fish reactions to towed gears. In: MacDonald IGP AG (eds) Experimental biology at sea. University of Aberdeen, Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  88. Wieczorek SK, Campagnoulo S, Moore P, Froglia C, Atkinson RJ, Gramitto E, Bailey N (1999) The composition and fate of discards from Nephrops trawlers in Scottish and Italian waters. Final Report (96/092) to the EC, Study Project in support of the CFP (XIV/96/C75)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Environment Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (CEFAS)LowestoftUK

Personalised recommendations