Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 501–516 | Cite as

An overview of historical changes in the fishing gear and practices of pelagic longliners, with particular reference to Japan’s Pacific fleet

Research Paper


We identify changes in pelagic longline fishing gear and practices that need to be accounted for in stock assessments. Pelagic longline fishers have continuously modified their fishing gear and practices to improve fishing power and catchability, which has altered the relationship between catch rates and abundance. Advances in technology resulted in the introduction of many electronic devices to assist in navigation, communication and finding target species. The development of synthetic materials allowed improvements to lines and hooks that increased the probability of hooking target species and landing them. Other changes increased fishing power by improving searching efficiency (e.g., satellite imagery) or the time spent on fishing grounds (e.g., freezers). The number of hooks deployed in daily longlining operations has steadily increased since 1950. However, mean soak time did not change significantly because faster longline retrieval and deployment speeds balanced the increased hook numbers. There has been a shift from having all baits available at dawn, to having more available at dusk and at night. In the 1970s, several longline fleets began to exploit a much greater depth range, resulting in increased catchability for deep-dwelling species (e.g., bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus) and reduced catchability for epipelagic species like blue marlin (Makaira nigricans). Research has been mostly limited to the effects of longline depth on the catchability of target species. Recent experiments have quantified the effects of bycatch mitigation measures on fishing power and catchability. Progressive improvements in expertise and technological improvements in the gear will also affect fishing power, but are particularly difficult to quantify.


Effort standardization Fishing power Catchability Longline Pelagic Tuna 



The Bureau of Rural Sciences supported the compilation of this article. The article is largely based on the observations of fishers, observers, scientists and other experts, including Johnny Aoki, Steve Auld, Steve Beverly, Deirdre Brogan, James Findlay, Gretchen Fitzgerald, Jay Hender, David Itano, Makoto (Peter) Miyake, Dae-Yeon Moon, RAM Myers, Tim Park, Martin Scott, Bob Stanley, John Watson and Peter Williams. Albert Caton, James Findlay, Kevin Mcloughlin and two anonymous referees provided comments on drafts of this article.


  1. Anonymous (1952) Southern tuna fishery experiment report. Kanagawa Prefecture Fishery Experiment Station, Report no. 3Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1987) Navaids – position fixing systems. Safety At Sea March:12–16Google Scholar
  3. Arregion-Sanchez F (1996) Catchability: a key parameter for fish stock assessment. Rev Fish Biol Fish 6(2):221–242Google Scholar
  4. Au D (1985) Species composition in the Japanese long-line fishery off the southern and eastern Unites States. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT 22(2):376–385Google Scholar
  5. Bach P, Dagorn L, Misselis C (2000) The role of bait type on pelagic longline efficiency. ICES Annual Science Conference Theme Session J: Efficiency, selectivity and impacts of passive fishing gears CM 2000/J:01, International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), Brugge, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker B, Robertson G (2004) Negotiating the chicanes on the road to eliminating seabird bycatch: lessons learnt in an Australian pelagic fishery. In: Abstracts, volume, oral and poster presentations from the third international albatross and petrel conference (IAPC), Montevideo, Uruguay, 23–27 August 2004, pp 59–60Google Scholar
  7. Berkeley SA, Irby EWJ, Jolley JWJ (1981) Florida’s commercial swordfish fishery: longline gear and methods. Marine Advisory Bulletin MAP-14, Florida Sea Grant. University of Florida, MiamiGoogle Scholar
  8. Beverly S (2001) Longline fishing perspectives: techniques, gear, boats, bait and recent trends. 14th meeting of the standing committee on tuna and billfish, Noumea, New Caledonia 9–16 August 2001, FTWG-10Google Scholar
  9. Beverly S, Chapman L, Sokimi W (2003) Horizontal longline fishing—methods and techniques: a manual for fishermen Secretariat of the Pacific Community. Noumea, New CaledoniaGoogle Scholar
  10. Beverton RJH, Holt SJ (1957) On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fishery Investigations Series 2, 19. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, London, Great BritainGoogle Scholar
  11. Bigelow KA, Boggs CH, He X (1999) Environmental effects on swordfish and blue shark catch rates in the US North Pacific longline fishery. Fish Oceanogr 8:178–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bigelow KA, Hampton J, Miyabe N (2002) Application of a habitat-based model to estimate effective longline effort and relative abundance of Pacific bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus). Fish Oceanogr 11:143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bigelow K, Musyl MK, Poisson F, Kleiber P (2006) Pelagic longline gear depth and shoaling. Fish Res 77:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bishop J (2006) Standardizing fishery-dependent catch and effort data in complex fisheries with technology change. Rev Fish Biol Fish 16:21–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boggs CH (1992) Depth, capture time, and hooked longevity of longline-caught pelagic fish: timing bites of fish with chips. Fish Bull 90:642–658Google Scholar
  16. Boggs CH (2001) Deterring albatrosses from contacting baits during swordfish longline sets. In: Melvin E, Parish JK (eds) Seabird bycatch: trends, roadblocks and solutions. University of Alaska Sea Grant, Fairbanks, Alaska, pp 79–94Google Scholar
  17. Bolten AB, Bjorndal KA (2005) Experiment to evaluate gear modification on rates of sea turtle bycatch in the longline fishery in the Azores – Phase 4. Final Project report submitted to the US National Marine Fisheries Service. Archie Carr Center for Sea Turtle Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Branstetter S, Musick JA (1993) Comparisons of shark catch rates on longline using rope/steel (Yankee) and monofilament gangions. Mar Fish Rev 55(3):4–9Google Scholar
  19. Brothers N, Foster AB, Robertson G (1995) The influence of bait quality on the sink rate of bait used in the Japanese longline tuna fishing industry: an experimental approach. CCAMLR Sci 2:123–129Google Scholar
  20. Brothers N, Gales R, Reid T (2001) The effect of line weighting on the sink rate of pelagic tuna longline hooks, and its potential for minimising seabird mortalities. Working Paper CCSBT–ERS/0111/53. Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  21. Bull (2007) A review of methodologies for mitigating incidental catch of seabirds in New Zealand fisheries. DOC Research & Development Series. Department of Conservation, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  22. Butler MJA, Mouchot M-C, Barale V, LeBlanc C (1988) The application of remotes sensing technology to marine fisheries, an introductory manual. Fisheries Technical Paper T295. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  23. Campana SE, Marks L, Joyce W, Kohler NE (2006) Effects of recreational and commercial fishing on blue sharks (Prionace glauca) in Atlantic Canada with influences on the North Atlantic population. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63(3):670–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Campbell R (1997) Measures of effort in commercial longline fisheries—a theoretical discussion. Paper presented at 7th meeting of the Western Pacific Yellowfin Tuna Research Group (WPYRG7), Nadi, Fiji, 18–20 June 1997, South Pacific Commission, Noumea, New CaledoniaGoogle Scholar
  25. Cooke JG, Beddington JR (1984) The relationship between catch rates and abundance in fisheries. IMA J Math Appl Med Biol 1:391–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dagorn L, Bach P, Josse E (2000) Movement patterns of large bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the open ocean determined using ultrasonic telemetry. Mar Biol 136:361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Decca Navigator Co Ltd (1959) The Decca Navigator System and its application to fishing. In: Kristjonsson H (ed) Modern fishing gear of the world. Fishing News Books Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Duckworth K (1995) Analysis of factors which influence seabird bycatch in the Japanese southern bluefin tuna longline fishery in New Zealand waters 1989–1993. New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Research Document 95/26Google Scholar
  29. Ego K, Otsu T (1952) Japanese mothership-type expeditions in the western equatorial Pacific June 1950 to June 1951. U.S. Fish Wildlife Service Commercial Fish Rev 14:1–19Google Scholar
  30. Falterman B, Graves JE (2002) A preliminary comparison of the relative mortality and hooking efficiency of circle and straight shank “J” hooks used in the pelagic longline industry. Am Fish Soc Symp 30:80–87Google Scholar
  31. Fisheries Agency of Japan (1962–80) Annual report of effort and catch statistics by area on Japanese longline fishery. Research Division Fisheries Agency of Japan, NankaiGoogle Scholar
  32. Fitzgerald B (1996) Potential for aquaculture of bait in Guam. Fish Newslett, Secretary of the Pacific Community 76:24–27Google Scholar
  33. Gilman E, Brothers N, Kobayashi DR, Martin S, Cook J, Ray J, Ching G, Woods R (2003) Performance assessment of underwater setting chutes, side setting and blue-dyed bait to minimize seabird mortality in Hawaii longline tuna and swordfish fisheries. Final Report. National Audubon Society, Hawaii Longline Association, US National Marine Fisheries Service Pacific Islands Science Center, US Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, Honolulu, HI, USAGoogle Scholar
  34. Gong Y, Lee J-U, Kim Y-S, Yang W-S (1989) Fishing efficiency of Korean regular and deep longline gears and vertical distribution of tunas in the Indian Ocean. Bull Korean Fish Soc 22:86–94Google Scholar
  35. Gulland JA (1969) Manual of methods for fish stock assessment Part 1 Fish population analysis. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), RomeGoogle Scholar
  36. Higashi M, Yuwaki Y (1993) Fishery study of tuna in the western tropical Pacific – I. Mem Fac Fish Kagoshima Univ 42:31–48Google Scholar
  37. Hilborn R, Ledbetter M (1985) Determinants of catching power in the British Columbia salmon purse seine fleet. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42(1):51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hindmarsh S, Ward P (in press) Fishing gear and practices used in pelagic longline fisheries. Bureau of Rural Sciences, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  39. Hinton MG, Nakano H (1996) Standardizing catch and effort statistics using physiological, ecological, or behavioural constraints and environmental data, with an application to blue marlin (Makaira nigricans) catch and effort data from the Japanese longline fisheries in the Pacific. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT 21(4):169–200Google Scholar
  40. Hoey J, Mejuto J, Iglesius S, Conser R (1998) A comparative study of the United States and Spanish longline fleets targeting swordfish in the Atlantic Ocean north of 40°N latitude. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT 27:230–239Google Scholar
  41. Imber MJ (1994) Report on a tuna long-lining fishing voyage aboard Southern Venture to observe seabird by-catch problems. Science and Research Series 65. Department of Conservation, Wellington New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  42. Inmarsat (2006) Maritime communications and safety. Cited 17 March 2006Google Scholar
  43. Izui Iron Works Co Ltd (1959) Power hauler for longlines. In: Kristjonsson H (ed) Modern fishing gear of the world. Fishing News Books Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Kawai Y (1995) Affect of improved fishing techniques on cpue of Japanese tuna longline fishing. SBFWS/95/10 presented at the second CCSBT scientific meeting, Shimizu, August 1995. CSIRO Marine Laboratories, HobartGoogle Scholar
  45. Keith C (1998) Tori line designs for New Zealand domestic pelagic longliners. Conservation Advisory Science Notes 248. Department of Conservation, Wellington New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  46. Kerstetter DW, Graves JE (2006) Effects of circle versus J-style hooks on target and non-target species in a pelagic longline fishery. Fish Res 80:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kirby DS, Abraham ER, Uddstrom MJ, Dean H (2003) Tuna schools/aggregations in surface longline data 1993–98. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res 37:633–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kodaira K (1959) Radio communication apparatus for fishing boats in Japan. In: Kristjonsson H (ed) Modern fishing gear of the world. Fishing News Books Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Koido T (1985) Comparison of fishing efficiency between regular and deep longline gears on bigeye and yellowfin tunas in the Indian Ocean. FAO IPTP TWS 85/25:62–70Google Scholar
  50. Lee Y-C, Nishida T, Mohri M (2005) Separation of the Taiwanese regular and deep tuna longliners in the Indian Ocean using bigeye tuna catch ratios. Fish Res 71:1256–1263Google Scholar
  51. Lin J-C, Wu C-C, Huang C-S, Su W-C (1997) Fishing efficiency of an American fishing system for a small-scale tuna longliner. J Fish Soc Taiwan 24:93–101Google Scholar
  52. Løkkeborg S (1994) Fish behaviour and longlining. In: Fernö A, Olsen S (eds) Marine fish behaviour in capture and abundance estimation. Blackwell, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  53. Lyne V, Parlsow J, Young J, Pearce A, Lynch M (2000) Development, application and evaluation of the use of remote sensing by Australian fisheries. Report MR-C 2000/04. CSIRO, HobartGoogle Scholar
  54. Maéda H (1967) Distribution pattern of fish in relation to fishing method, with special reference to that of tuna along longline. In: Proceedings of the symposium on scombroid fishes, Part III:1025–1041Google Scholar
  55. Matsumoto T, Uozumi Y, Uosaki K, Okazaki M (2000) Preliminary review of billfish hooking depth measured by small bathythermograph systems attached to longline gear. Report of the Fourth ICCAT Billfish Workshop, 18–28 July 2000, Miami, Florida. International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas 53:337–344Google Scholar
  56. Maunder MN, Punt AE (2004) Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches. Fish Res 70(2–3):141–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McNamara B, Torre L, Kaaialii G (1999) Final Report. Hawaii Longline Seabird Mortality Mitigation Project, Prepared for the Western Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Council (WESPAC). Honolulu, 93 pGoogle Scholar
  58. Miyake PM (2004) A brief history of the tuna fisheries of the world. In: Bayliff WH, de Leiva Moreno JI, Majkowski J (eds) Second Meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee of the FAO Project “Management of Tuna Fishing Capacity: Conservation and Socio-economics, Madrid, Spain, 15–18 March 2004, FAO Fisheries Proceedings No. 2, FAO, Rome, pp 23–50Google Scholar
  59. Montrey N (1999) Fishing with circle hooks. American Sportfishing 2(1):6–7Google Scholar
  60. Murphy GI (1960) Estimating abundance from longline catches. J Fish Res Board Can 17(1):33–40Google Scholar
  61. Murphy GI, Elliot KC (1954) Variability in longline catches of yellowfin tuna. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  62. Murphy GI, Otsu T (1954) Analysis of catches of nine Japanese tuna longline expeditions to the western Pacific. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Special Scientific Report – Fisheries vol 128, 46 ppGoogle Scholar
  63. Murphy GI, Shomura RS (1955) Longline fishing for deep-swimming tunas in the central Pacific, August–November 1952. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Special Scientific Report – Fisheries vol 137, 42 ppGoogle Scholar
  64. Musyl MK, Brill RW, Boggs CH, Curran DS, Kazama TK, Seki MP (2003) Vertical movements of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) associated with islands, buoys, and seamounts near the main Hawaiian Islands from archival tagging data. Fish Oceanogr 12:152–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nakamura H (1950) The Japanese long-line fishery for tunas. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Commercial Fish Rev 12(4):1–26Google Scholar
  66. Nakamura H (1951) Tuna longline fishery and fishing grounds. Report of the Nankai Regional Fish Res Laboratory 1, 144 ppGoogle Scholar
  67. Nakano H, Okazaki M, Okamoto H (1997) Analysis of catch depth by species for tuna longline fishery based on catch by branch lines. Bull Natl Res Inst Far Seas Fish 34:43–62Google Scholar
  68. Okamoto H, Miyabe N, Shono H (2003) Standardized Japanese longline CPUE for bigeye tuna in the Indian Ocean up to 2002 with consideration on gear categorization . IOTC/WPTT/04 Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, SeychellesGoogle Scholar
  69. Omori K (1995) The adaptive significance of a lunar or semilunar reproductive cycle in marine animals. Ecol Model 82:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Orbimage (2006) SeaStar: helping you find the catch. Cited 5 July 2006Google Scholar
  71. Otsu T (1954) Analysis of the Hawaiian long-line fishery, 1948–52. Commercial Fish Rev 16:1–17Google Scholar
  72. Paloheimo JG, Dickie LM (1964) Abundance and fishing success. ICES J Mar Sci 155:152–163Google Scholar
  73. Podesta GP, Browder JA, Hoey JJ (1993) Exploring the association between swordfish catch rates and thermal fronts on U.S. longline grounds in the western North Atlantic. Continental Shelf Res 13(2–3):253–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Polacheck T (1991) Measures of effort in tuna longline fisheries: changes at the operational level. Fish Res 12(1):75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Poulsen TM (2004) Update on recent modifications of fishing gear and fishing procedures to reduce bycatch of sea turtles in longline fishery. FAO TC:STCF/2004/DMA.2 Cited 31 July 2006Google Scholar
  76. Reid C, Vakurepe R, Campbell H (2003) Tuna prices and fishing costs for bioeconomic modelling of the western and central Pacific tuna fisheries. ACIAR Project No. ASEM/2001/036: Maximising the Economic Benefits to Pacific Island Nations from Management of Migratory Tuna Stocks, Technical Paper No. 1, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  77. Rey JC, Munoz-Chapuli R (1991) Relation between hook depth and fish efficiency in surface longline gear. Fish Bull 89:729–732Google Scholar
  78. Robins CM, Wang Y, Die D (1998) The impact of global positioning systems and plotters on fishing power in the northern prawn fishery, Australia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1645–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rothschild BJ (1967) Competition for gear in a multi-species fishery. ICES J Mar Sci 31:102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sakagawa GT, Coan AL, Bartoo NW (1987) Patterns in longline fishery data and catches of bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus. Mar Fish Rev 49:57–66Google Scholar
  81. Scott GP, Brown C, Cramer J (2000) Live bait vs dead bait evaluations of US pelagic longline fishing incidental catch rates of billfish in the Gulf of Mexico. Cited 17 February 2006Google Scholar
  82. Shapiro S (1950) The Japanese longline fishery for tunas US. Fish Wildlife Service. Commercial Fish Rev 12:1–26Google Scholar
  83. Shea DJ, Worley SJ, Stern IR, Hoar TJ (1995) An introduction to atmospheric and oceanographic datasets NCAR/TN-404+IA. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado. Cited 17 March 2006Google Scholar
  84. Shimada BM (1951) Japanese tuna-mothership operations in the western equatorial Pacific Ocean US. Fish and Wildlife Service. Commercial Fish Rev 13:1–26Google Scholar
  85. Shimada K (1972) On the bait for tuna long-line – III. N.T. Fishing light type L.L. of acryl resin. Mem Fac Fish, Kagoshima Univ 21(1):79–89Google Scholar
  86. Shimada K, Tsurudome M (1971) On the bait for tuna long-line – II. On the saury, mackerel and mackerel scad baits for tuna fishing. Mem Fac Fish, Kagoshima Univ 20:119–130Google Scholar
  87. Shomura RS (1955) A comparative study of longline baits. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Special Scientific Report: Fisheries, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  88. Simrad (2006) Sound in water—50 years at the forefront., Cited 9 March 2006Google Scholar
  89. Sivasubramaniam K (1961) Relation between soaking time and catch of tunas in longline fisheries. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 27(9):835–845Google Scholar
  90. Smith TD (1994) Scaling fisheries: the science of measuring the effects of fishing, 1855–1955. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  91. Squires D, Kirkley J (1999) Skipper skill and panel data in fishing industries. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56(11):2011–2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Stone HH, Dixon LK (2001) A comparison of catches of swordfish, Xiphias gladius and other pelagic species from Canadian longline gear configured with alternating monofilament and multifilament nylon gangions. Fish Bull 99:210–216Google Scholar
  93. Stoner AW (2004) Effects of environmental variables on fish feeding ecology: implications for the performance of baited fishing gear and stock assessment. J Fish Biol 65:1445–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sullivan PJ, Rebert SD (1998) Interpreting Pacific halibut catch statistics in the British Columbia individual quota program. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55(1):99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Suiyo-Kai (1959) Radio direction finders and radar used by Japanese fishing vessels. In: Kristjonsson H (ed) Modern fishing gear of the world. Fishing News Books Ltd., London, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  96. Suzuki Z, Warashina Y, Kishida M (1977) The comparison of catches by regular and deep tuna longline gears in the western and central equatorial Pacific. Bull Far Seas Fish Res Lab 15:51–89Google Scholar
  97. Suzuki Z, Kume S (1981) Fishing efficiency of deep longline for bigeye tuna in the Atlantic as inferred from the operations in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT 17:471–486Google Scholar
  98. Svejkovsky J (1996) Satellite remote sensing on the high seas. Earth Observation Magazine, May Cited 17 March 2006Google Scholar
  99. TBMIAC (2006) Maritime communications. Telecommunications Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications Cited 21 February 2006Google Scholar
  100. Tominaga H, Neo M, Nippon Suisan Kaisha Ltd., Okabe G (1963) Japanese mothership and fleet operations for salmon, crab, longlining and tuna. In: Modern fishing gear of the world 2. FAO World Gear Congress, London, 1963, Fishing News Books Ltd., London, pp 423–438Google Scholar
  101. Tsurudome M (1970) On the bait for tuna long-line–I. An artificial bait of vinyl chloride shaped like flying fish. Mem Fac Fish, Kagoshima Univ 19:81–90Google Scholar
  102. Ward PJ (ed) (1996) Japanese longlining in eastern Australian waters 1962–90. Bureau of Resource Sciences, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  103. Ward P, Elscot S (2000) Broadbill swordfish: Status of world fisheries. Bureau of Rural Sciences, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  104. Ward P, Myers RA, Blanchard W (2004) Fish lost at sea: the effect of soak time and timing on pelagic longline catches. Fish Bull 102:179–195Google Scholar
  105. Ward P, Myers RA (2005) A method for inferring the depth distribution of catchability for pelagic fishes and correcting for variations in the depth of longline fishing gear. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62(5):1130–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Ward P, Myers R (accepted) Bait loss and its effects on fishing power in pelagic longline fisheries. Fish ResGoogle Scholar
  107. Watson JW, Bergmann CE, Shah A, Foster D, Epperly S (2004) Evaluation of 18/0 circle hook in the Gulf of Mexico tuna fishery. Report on experiments conducted in 2004. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Center, Pascagoula, MS, 14 ppGoogle Scholar
  108. Watson JW, Epperly SP, Shah AK, Foster DG (2005) Fishing methods to reduce sea turtle mortality associated with pelagic longlines. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62(5):965–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Whitelaw W, Baron M (1995) Recent changes in Japanese longline gear and techniques which may effect cpue. SBFWS/95/10 Paper presented at the second CCSBT scientific meeting, Shimizu, August 1995, CSIRO Marine Laboratories, HobartGoogle Scholar
  110. Wildman MR (1997) Asia-swordfish fisheries. In: World swordfish fisheries: an analysis of swordfish fisheries, market trends, and trade patterns, past-present-future, vol III. Prepared by the Office of Science and Technology, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, US Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, Maryland, USAGoogle Scholar
  111. Williams K (1993) Target longlining for broadbill swordfish using chemical light sticks. WW Fisheries Consultants, Cronulla, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  112. Yamaguchi Y (1989) Tuna long-line fishing. Mar Behav Physiol 15:1–81Google Scholar
  113. Yokawa K, Saito H (2004) Results of comparison of catch ratio between shallow and deep setting obtained from 2002 Shoyo-Maru survey in the tropical Atlantic. SCRS/2003/036 Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT 56(1):195–200Google Scholar
  114. Yokota K, Kiyota M, Minami H (2006) Shark catch in a pelagic longline fishery: comparison of circle and tuna hooks. Fish Res 81:337–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fisheries and Marine Sciences ProgramBureau of Rural SciencesCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations