Advertisement

International Review of Education

, Volume 65, Issue 5, pp 755–784 | Cite as

Application of the Literacy Training Service component of the National Service Training Program in New Bilibid Prison (Philippines)

  • Emma Lina F. LopezEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In 2000, the government of the Philippines launched its National Service Training Program (NSTP), a compulsory 2-semester course component for all the country’s Bachelor and technical vocational students. There is a choice of three subject areas, one of which is the Literacy Training Service (LTS) module. This is designed to train students in teaching literacy and numeracy skills to schoolchildren, out-of-school youths and other citizens in need of their services, including prison inmates. This article looks into the application of NSTP-LTS at New Bilibid Prison in Muntinlupa City, Metro Manila. The author’s study involved 24 students (13 female, 11 male) from the University of the Philippines teaching 40 male inmate learners incarcerated in the national penitentiary’s medium security compound over a period of two months. Many of the inmate learners (aged 14–61) had very low literacy and numeracy skills, and some had never been to school at all. The university students were immersed in an environment entirely unknown to them and performed roles from which they obtained a different perspective and understanding of society. The inmate learners were eager to avail of this opportunity to participate in second-chance education. Despite the many benefits of this learning process for all participants, in her conclusion, the author points out several challenges which still need to be overcome to optimise the application of NSTP-LTS in correctional institutions of the Philippines.

Keywords

teacher training National Service Training Program Literacy Training Service Alternative Learning System (ALS) New Bilibid Prison prison education inmate learners 

Résumé

Application du module Service de formation à l'alphabétisation du Programme national de service de formation dans la prison de New Bilibid (Philippines) – Le Gouvernement philippin a lancé en 2000 son programme national de formation, module didactique sur deux semestres obligatoire pour tous les élèves en formation professionnelle technique et les étudiants en licence du pays. Ils peuvent choisir entre trois domaines, dont le service d’alphabétisation. Ce dernier a pour but de former les étudiants à enseigner les compétences de base en alphabétisme et numératie aux écoliers, aux jeunes déscolarisés et à d’autres citoyens nécessitant ces prestations, dont les personnes incarcérées. Le présent article analyse l’application de ce module dans la prison de New Bilibid de Muntinlupa-Ville, Metro Manila. L’auteure a impliqué dans son étude 13 étudiantes et 11 étudiants de l’université des Philippines, qui ont dispensé pendant une période de deux mois un enseignement à 40 apprenants masculins incarcérés dans le centre pénitentiaire national de sécurité moyenne. Un grand nombre d’entre eux (âgés de 14 à 61 ans) avaient des compétences de base très succinctes, et quelques-uns n’avaient jamais été scolarisés. Les étudiants ont été immergés dans un environnement qui leur était entièrement inconnu, ils ont assumé des tâches qui leur ont ouvert une perspective et permis une appréhension différentes de la société. Les détenus apprenants étaient très désireux de saisir cette occasion de suivre un enseignement de la seconde chance. Malgré les nombreux bienfaits de cette démarche d’apprentissage pour tous les participants, l’auteure relève dans sa conclusion plusieurs défis qui restent à surmonter afin d’optimiser l’application de ce programme dans les établissements pénitentiaires des Philippines.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article/the work discussed in it was funded by a Research Grant from the Asian Institute of Tourism, University of the Philippines in Diliman.

References

  1. Ayala, G. (1996). Custody and rehabilitation of prisoners: Its implications for national security. Unpublished Master’s thesis. National Defense College of the Philippines, Quezon City.Google Scholar
  2. Beccaria, C. (1986 [1764]). On crimes and punishments. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
  3. BuCor (Bureau of Corrections). (2000). Bureau of Corrections operating manual. NBP Reservation, Muntinlupa City: Bureau of Corrections. Retrieved 1 August 2019 from http://www.bucor.gov.ph/publication/Bucor%20Manual/bucor_manual.html.
  4. DepEd (Department of Education). (n.d.). About Alternative learning system (ALS) [dedicated webpage]. Retrieved 1 August 2019 from https://www.deped.gov.ph/k-to-12/inclusive-education/about-alternative-learning-system/.
  5. Ethnologue. (2019). Languages of the world: Philippines [online resource; 22nd edn]. Retrieved 1 August from https://www.ethnologue.com/country/PH.
  6. Ghailani, J. S., & Khan, S. A. (2004). Quality of secondary education and labour market requirement. Journal of Services Research, 4(1), 161–172.Google Scholar
  7. Jurevicius, O. (2013). McKinsey 7s model. SM Insight [online article, 20 Dec]. Retrieved 1 August from https://www.strategicmanagementinsight.com/tools/mckinsey-7s-model-framework.html.
  8. Lopez, E. L. F. (2006). Management of prison education: A model. Unpublished dissertation. College of Education, University of the Philippines, Diliman.Google Scholar
  9. Lopez, E. L. F. (2015). Management of the correctional education program for students behind bars. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education, 4(1), 102–109.Google Scholar
  10. Morales, H. (2003). Assessment of the rehabilitation programs and services and the adjustment level of inmates at the BuCor (National Penitentiary). Unpublished dissertation. University of Santo Tomas, Manila.Google Scholar
  11. Mote, V. L. (1985). Development of Management Education in India: Role of the Institutes of Management. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 10(4), 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. OHCHR (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights). (1990). Basic principles for the treatment of prisoners. Geneva: OHCHR. Retrieved 1 August 2019 from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/BasicPrinciplesTreatmentOfPrisoners.aspx.
  13. Pascale, R. T., & Athos, A. G. (1981). The art of Japanese management. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peters, T. (2011). A brief history of the 7-S (“McKinsey 7-S”) model. TomPeters!, 9 January 2011 [blogpost]. Retrieved 1 August 2019 from https://tompeters.com/2011/03/a-brief-history-of-the-7-s-mckinsey-7-s-model/.
  15. Peters, T., & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Peterson, C. (2008). What is positive psychology, and what is it not? Psychology Today [blogpost 16 May]. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-good-life/200805/what-is-positive-psychology-and-what-is-it-not.
  17. RoP (Republic of the Philippines). (1987). The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. Quezon City: The Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved 1 August 2019 from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/.
  18. RoP. (2000). Non-formal education system National Literacy Awards entry conditions. Manila: Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines.Google Scholar
  19. RoP. (2001a). Republic Act no. 9155. An Act instituting a framework of governance for basic education, establishing authority and accountability, renaming the Department of Education, Culture and Sports as the Department of Education, and for other purposes [also known as the “Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001”]. Manila: Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved 1 August 2019 from https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2001/08/11/republic-act-no-9155/.
  20. RoP. (2001b). Republic Act no. 9163. An Act establishing the National Service Training Program (NSTP) for the tertiary level students, amending for the purpose Republic Act no. 7077 Presidential Decree no. 1706, and for other purposes. Manila: Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved 1 August 2019 from http://nstp.upd.edu.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Republic-Act.-No-9163-NSTP-Act-2001.pdf.
  21. Seppings, C. (2015). To study the rehabilitative role of ex-prisoners/offenders on peer mentors in reintegration models—In the UK, Republic of Ireland, Sweden and USA. Canberra, ACT: The Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia. Retrieved 31 May 2019 from https://www.churchilltrust.com.au/media/fellows/Seppings_C_2015_Rehabilitative_role_of_ex-prisoners__offenders_as_peer_mentors.pdf.
  22. Simister, P. (2011). McKinsey 7 S framework for strategic fit. Differentiate your business [blogpost 2 September]. Retrieved 1 August 2019 from http://www.differentiateyourbusiness.co.uk/mckinsey-7-s-framework-for-strategic-fit.
  23. Tetenbaum, T. J. (1998). Shifting paradigms: From Newton to chaos. Organizational Dynamics, 26(4), 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. UN (United Nations). (1955). Standard minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners. New York: United Nations. Retrieved 1 August 2019 from http://www.hrw.org/advocacy/prisons/un-smrs.htm.

Copyright information

© UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning and Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Asian Institute of TourismUniversity of the PhilippinesQuezon CityPhilippines

Personalised recommendations