Advertisement

Ubuntu in adult vocational education: Theoretical discussion and implications for teaching international students

  • Ly Thi TranEmail author
  • Tony Wall
Original Paper

Abstract

Evidence now calls into question the efficacy and appropriateness of pedagogical practices that force international students to adapt to Eurocentric expectations when they enrol in tertiary education outside their home country and cultural environment. In response to calls for alternative perspectives, this article introduces the educational philosophy of ubuntu, an African worldview prioritising “humanness” and interconnectedness, and utilises it as a conceptual lens to examine the key tenets of engaging pedagogical practices in teaching international students. Based on a research project in Australia, the aim of which was to analyse teachers’ adaptation of pedagogical practices in accommodating international students, the authors’ findings point to three main ways in which the ubuntu principle can manifest in teaching international students: (1) humanness; (2) interconnectedness; and (3) situatedness. This article offers new insights into how an under-researched, non-Western philosophy – ubuntu – can serve to conceptualise international education practice. In doing so, it contributes to theory building and at the same time provokes consideration of an alternative pedagogical lens. In particular, this article draws on ubuntu as a critical framework to challenge conventional ways of viewing international students as the “other” in “our” educational system.

Keywords

ubuntu African philosophy of education international education international students humanness in education teaching and learning of international students adult learners 

Résumé

L’ubuntu dans la formation professionnelle des adultes : débat théorique et implications pour l’enseignement aux étudiants internationaux – Les données scientifiques remettent aujourd’hui en question l’efficacité et la pertinence des pratiques pédagogiques qui contraignent les étudiants internationaux à s’adapter aux attentes eurocentriques quand ils intègrent un établissement d’enseignement supérieur hors de leur pays natal et de leur environnement culturel. Répondant aux demandes de perspectives nouvelles, les auteurs de l’article présentent la philosophie éducative ubuntu, vision du monde africaine qui privilégie l’humanisme et l’interconnectivité; ils l’utilisent dans une optique conceptuelle pour examiner les grands principes appliqués aux pratiques pédagogiques dans l’enseignement aux étudiants internationaux. À partir d’un projet de recherche réalisé en Australie visant à analyser l’adaptation par les enseignants des pratiques pédagogiques lors de l’accueil d’étudiants internationaux dans le secteur de la formation professionnelle, les auteurs déduisent de leurs résultats trois optiques principales par lesquelles la perspective ubuntu peut se manifester dans l’enseignement aux étudiants internationaux : 1) humanisme, 2) interconnectivité, et 3) contextualisation. Cet article apporte de nouveaux éclairages sur la manière dont une philosophie non occidentale et insuffisamment étudiée, l’ubuntu, peut servir à conceptualiser la pratique éducative internationale. Ce faisant, elle contribue à l’élaboration de théories et en même temps favorise la prise en compte d’une perspective pédagogique nouvelle. En particulier, les auteurs abordent l’ubuntu comme un cadre critique permettant de bousculer les modes conventionnels de considérer l’étudiant international, qui est « l’autre » dans « notre » système éducatif.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their very useful feedback and suggestions which helped us considerably in improving this article. We acknowledge with thanks the valuable contributions from the teacher participants of our study and the funding from the Australian Research Council for this project.

References

  1. AEI (Australian Education International) (2019). End of year summary of international student data 2018. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Education and Training.Google Scholar
  2. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  3. Arkoudis, S., Baik, C., Marginson, S., & Cassidy, E. (2012). Internationalising the student experience in Australian tertiary education: Developing criteria and indicators. Melbourne: Australian Education International (AEI), Australian Government.Google Scholar
  4. Assié-Lumumba, N. D. T. (2016). Evolving African attitudes to European education: Resistance, pervert effects of the single system paradox, and the ubuntu framework for renewal. International Review of Education, 62(1), 11–27.Google Scholar
  5. Bache, I., & Hayton, R. (2012). Inquiry-based learning and the international student. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(4), 411–423.Google Scholar
  6. Bangura, A. K. (2005). Ubuntugogy: An African educational paradigm that transcends pedagogy, andragogy, ergonagy and heutagogy. Journal of Third World Studies, 22(2), 13–53.Google Scholar
  7. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.Google Scholar
  8. Bell, D. A., & Metz, T. (2012). Confucianism and ubuntu: Reflections on a dialogue between Chinese and African Traditions. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 38(1), 78–95.Google Scholar
  9. Brock-Utne, B. (2016). The ubuntu paradigm in curriculum work, language of instruction and assessment. International Review of Education, 62(1), 29–44.Google Scholar
  10. Caruana, V. (2014). Re-thinking global citizenship in higher education: From cosmopolitanism and international mobility to cosmopolitanisation, resilience and resilient thinking. Higher Education Quarterly, 68(1), 85–104.Google Scholar
  11. Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). Cultural mirrors: Materials and methods in the EFL classrooms. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 196–219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gathogo, J. M. (2008). African philosophy as expressed in the concepts of hospitality and ubuntu. Journal of Theology for Southern Africa, 130(1), 39–53.Google Scholar
  13. Gebhard, J. G. (2012). International students’ adjustment problems and behaviors. Journal of International Students, 2(2), 184–193.Google Scholar
  14. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Goodall, H. (2014). Middle East meets West: Negotiating cultural difference in international educational encounters. International Review of Education, 60(5), 603–617.Google Scholar
  16. Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30(1), 70–90.Google Scholar
  17. Green, R. D., & Farazmand, F. A. (2013). Applied project learning outcomes: Differences between United States and international students. Business Education and Accreditation, 5(1), 41–51.Google Scholar
  18. Gyekye, K. (1997). Tradition and modernity: Philosophical reflections on the African experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Higgs, P. (2012). African philosophy and the de-colonialisation of education in Africa: Some critical reflections. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(2), 37–55.Google Scholar
  20. Horsthemke, K. (2009). Rethinking humane education. Ethics and Education, 4(2), 201–214.Google Scholar
  21. Horsthemke, K., & Enslin, P. (2009). African philosophy of education: The price of unchangeability. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28(3), 209–222.Google Scholar
  22. Horsthemke, K., & Kissack, M. (2008). Vorleben: Educational practice beyond prescription. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(3), 277–288.Google Scholar
  23. Hountondji, P. J. (1996). African philosophy: Myth and reality (trans: Evans, H. & Ree, J.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  24. ICEF (International Consultants for Education and Fairs) (2018). Australia’s international education exports grew by 22% in 2017. ICEF Monitor, 17 April. Retrieved March 5, 2019, from http://monitor.icef.com/2018/04/australias-international-education-exports-grew-22-2017/.
  25. Ilmi, A. (2012). Living the Indigenous ways of knowing: The African self and a holistic way of life. The Journal of Pan African Studies, 4(9), 148–160.Google Scholar
  26. Impetus. (2014). Ready for work. The capabilities young people need to find and keep work—And the programmes proven to help develop these. London: Impetus—The Private Equity Foundation. Retrieved March 7, 2019, from https://impetus-pef.org.uk/assets/publications/Report/2014_09-Ready-for-Work.pdf.
  27. Kawada, Y. (1999). From inner peace to world peace: A Buddhist perspective. In W. A. Dorn (Ed.), World order for a new millennium: Political, cultural, and spiritual approaches to building peace (pp. 196–200). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Le Grange, L. (2012). Ubuntu, ukama, environment and moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 41(3), 329–340.Google Scholar
  29. Letseka, M. (2000). African philosophy and educational discourse. In P. Higgs, N. C. G. Vakalisa, T. V. Mda, & N. T. Assie-Lumumba (Eds.), African voices in education (pp. 179–193). Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
  30. Letseka, M. (2012). In defence of ubuntu. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(1), 47–60.Google Scholar
  31. Louw, D. J. (2011). Noetics and the notion of “ubuntu”-thinking within an intercultural hermeneutics and philosophy approach to theory formation in practical theology. International Journal of Practical Theology, 15(2), 173–192.Google Scholar
  32. Marginson, S., Nyland, C., Sawir, E., & Forbes-Mewett, H. (2010). International student security. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Masjuan, J. M., & Troiano, H. (2009). University students’ success: A psycho-sociological approach. Higher Education, 58(1), 15–28.Google Scholar
  34. Matthews, J., & Sidhu, R. (2005). Desperately seeking the global subject: International education, citizenship and cosmopolitanism. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 3(1), 49–66.Google Scholar
  35. Mbigi, L., & Maree, J. (2005). Ubuntu: The spirit of African transformation management. Randburg: Knowledge Resources Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. McLuhan, T. C. (1973). Touch the earth: A self portrait of Indian existence. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  37. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  38. Msila, V. (2013). Stephen Biko’s philosophy and its pedagogical implications in South Africa. Creative Education, 4(8), 492–496.Google Scholar
  39. Mungwini, P. (2011). The challenges of revitalizing an indigenous and Afrocentric moral theory in postcolonial education in Zimbabwe. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(7), 773–787.Google Scholar
  40. Muwanga-Zake, J. W. F. (2009). Building bridges across knowledge systems: Ubuntu and participatory research paradigms in Bantu communities. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(4), 413–426.Google Scholar
  41. Ntseane, P. G. (2011). Culturally sensitive transformational learning: Incorporating Afrocentric paradigm and African feminism. Adult Education Quarterly, 61(4), 307–323.Google Scholar
  42. O’Flaherty, J., Liddy, M., Tansey, L., & Roche, C. (2011). Educating engaged citizens: Four projects from Ireland. Education and Training, 53(4), 267–283.Google Scholar
  43. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2014). Indicator C4—Who studies abroad and where? In OECD (Ed.), Education at a glance: OECD indicators (pp. 342–361). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. OECD. (2015). Preparing students for the future. In OECD (Ed.), Education policy outlook 2015: Making reforms happen (pp. 57–75). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. OECD. (2017). Education at a glance 2017: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. OLD (Oxford Living Dictionary) (2019a). Consequentialism. In Oxford Living Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved March 19, 2019, from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/consequentialism.
  47. OLD. (2019b). Utilitarianism. In Oxford Living Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved March 19, 2019, from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/utilitarianism.
  48. Oviawe, J. O. (2016). How to rediscover the ubuntu paradigm in education. International Review of Education, 62(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  49. Pityana, N. B. (1999). The renewal of African moral values. In M. W. Makgoba (Ed.), African renaissance: The new struggle (pp. 137–148). Cape Town: Tafelberg/Mafube Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. Ralph, M., & Stubbs, W. (2014). Integrating environmental sustainability into universities. Higher Education, 67(1), 71–90.Google Scholar
  51. Rienties, B., Beausaert, S., Gronert, T., Niemantsverdriet, S., & Kommers, P. (2012). Understanding academic performance of international students: The role of ethnicity, academic and social integration. Higher Education, 63, 685–700.Google Scholar
  52. Roche, S. (2014). Who’s learning whose learning? How internationalisation and pressure to perform are transforming education and learning. International Review of Education, 60(5), 597–601.Google Scholar
  53. Ryan, J. (2011). Teaching and learning for international students: Towards a transcultural approach. Teachers and Teaching, 17(6), 631–648.Google Scholar
  54. Scholtz, Z., Braund, M., Hodges, M., Koopman, R., & Lubben, F. (2008). South African teachers’ ability to argue: The emergence of inclusive argumentation. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
  55. Selwyn, N. (2011). Digitally distanced learning: A study of international distance learners’ (non)use of technology. Distance Education, 32(1), 85–99.Google Scholar
  56. Sindane, J. (1994). Ubuntu and nation building. Pretoria: Ubuntu School of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  57. Talbot, J. (2010). Changing power relations in work based learning: Collaborative and contested relations between tutors, learners and employers. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Innovations in lifelong learning (pp. 187–208). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Thomas, G. (2013). How to do your research project: A guide for students in education and applied social sciences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Tran, L. T. (2011). Committed, face-value, hybrid or mutual adaptation? The experiences of international students in higher education. Educational Review, 63(1), 79–94.Google Scholar
  60. Tran, L. T. (2012). Transformative learning and international students’ negotiation of tertiary education. In M. Blythman & S. Sovic (Eds.), International students negotiating higher education: Critical perspectives (pp. 124–141). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Tran, L. T. (2013). Teaching international students in vocational education and training: New pedagogical approaches. Camberwell: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  62. Tran, L. T. (2016). Students’ academic, intercultural and personal development in globalised education mobility. In C. H. Ng, B. Fox, & M. Nakano (Eds.), Reforming learning and teaching in Asia–Pacific universities: Influences of globalised processes in Japan, Hong Kong and Australia (pp. 95–113). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Tran, L. T., & Gomes, C. (2017). Student mobility, connectedness and identity. In L. T. Tran & C. Gomes (Eds.), International student connectedness and identity (pp. 1–11). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  64. Waghid, Y., & Smeyers, P. (2012a). Reconsidering ubuntu: On the educational potential of a particular ethic of care. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(2), 6–20.Google Scholar
  65. Waghid, Y., & Smeyers, P. (2012b). Taking into account African philosophy: An impetus to amend the agenda of philosophy of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(2), 1–5.Google Scholar
  66. Wall, T. (2013). Diversity through negotiation. In K. Bridger, I. Reid, & J. Shaw (Eds.), Inclusive higher education: An international perspective on access and the challenge of student diversity (pp. 87–98). Faringdon: Libri Publishing.Google Scholar
  67. Wall, T., & Perrin, D. (2015). Slavoj Žižek: A Žižekian gaze at education. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  68. Wall, T., & Tran, L. T. (2015). The transcultural dance: Enriching work-based learning facilitation. In R. Heyler (Ed.), Work-based learning teacher handbook (pp. 227–246). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  69. Wiredu, K. (2003). Morality in African thought. In P. Coetzee & A. Roux (Eds.), Philosophy from Africa: A text with readings (pp. 321–401). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Wyse, D., Nikolajeva, M., Charlton, E., Cliff Hodges, G., Pointon, P., & Taylor, L. (2012). Place-related identity, texts, and transcultural meanings. British Educational Research Journal, 38(6), 1019–1039.Google Scholar
  71. Yunkaporta, T., & Kirby, M. (2011). Yarning up Indigenous pedagogies: A dialogue about eight Aboriginal ways of learning. In N. Purdie, G. Milgate, & H. R. Bell (Eds.), Two-way teaching and learning: Toward culturally reflective and relevant education (pp. 205–213). Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning and Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Work Related StudiesUniversity of ChesterChesterUK

Personalised recommendations