Advertisement

International Review of Education

, Volume 62, Issue 5, pp 523–540 | Cite as

The role of adult education and learning policy in fostering societal sustainability

  • Marcella Milana
  • Palle Rasmussen
  • John Holford
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

The idea of “sustainability” as a core value has slowly permeated policy and practice at governmental and institutional levels, in public and private policy. However, at times when social and economic crises have revealed the fragility of existing institutions and policies, it is important to consider how sustainability is – and could be – integrated into educational policies. In this theoretical contribution to a special issue on “Societal sustainability”, the authors draw on available literature and knowledge. They begin their paper by summarising the conditions under which the concept of “sustainability” entered political discourse in the early 1970s and outline how it has influenced educational research. They then introduce the longstanding debate about the relative role of tradition (in terms of traditional cultural and social order) and change (in terms of efforts to provide learning opportunities for everyone) in adult education. Finally, they argue for a rethinking of the ontology of sustainability: this, they suggest, can shed new light on its relationships with adult education and learning and social justice.

Keywords

Adult education Adult learning Education policy Sustainable development Societal sustainability 

Résumé

Pérennité des sociétés : rôle de l’éducation des adultes et des politiques éducatives – La notion de « pérennité » devenue valeur centrale a lentement gagné les politiques et les pratiques au niveau des gouvernements et institutions, dans les politiques publiques et privées. Mais à une époque où les crises sociales et économiques révèlent la fragilité des institutions et politiques existantes, il importe de considérer comment la pérennité est – et devrait être – intégrée dans les politiques éducatives. Dans cette contribution théorique à un numéro spécial sur la « pérennité des sociétés », les auteurs ont consulté la documentation et les connaissances disponibles. Ils commencent leur article en résumant les circonstances dans lesquelles le concept de « pérennité » est entré dans le discours politique au début des années 1970 et précisent comment il influence la recherche éducative. Puis ils abordent le débat de longue date sur le rôle relatif dans l’éducation des adultes de la tradition (en termes d’ordre culturel et social traditionnel) et du changement (en termes d’efforts pour fournir à tous des opportunités d’apprentissage). Enfin, ils appellent à repenser l’ontologie de la pérennité, ce qui pourrait à leur avis jeter un nouvel éclairage sur ses liens avec l’éducation des adultes et avec la justice éducative et sociale.

References

  1. Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., et al. (1995). Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecological Economics, 15(2), 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldi, U. (2011). The limits to growth revisited. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Blewitt, J., & Cullingford, C. (2004). The sustainability curriculum: The challenge for higher education. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1976). The experimental ecology of education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, 19–23 April.Google Scholar
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, T. (2013). Spatial and financial fixes and the global financial crisis: does labour have the knowledge and power to meet the challenge? International Journal of Lifelong Education, 32(6), 690–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Elsey, B. (2001). R H Tawney, patron saint of adult education. In P. Jarvis (Ed.), Twentieth-century thinkers in adult and continuing education (pp. 49–59). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  9. Faure, E., Herrera, F., Kaddoura, A. R., Lopes, H., Petrovski, A. V., Rahnema, M., et al. (1972). Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  10. Fisk, P. (2010). People, planet, profit: How to embrace sustainability for innovation and business growth. London: Kogan Page Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lewis, C. T., & Short, C. (1879). A Latin dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Livingstone, D. W. (2012). Lifelong learning and life-wide work in precarious times: Reversing policymaking optics. In D. N. Aspin, J. Chapman, K. Evans, & R. Bagnall (Eds.), Second international handbook of lifelong learning (pp. 269–286). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Matthews, J. (2011). Hybrid pedagogies for sustainability education. Review of Education, Pedagogies, and cultural Studies, 33(3), 260–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McFarlane, D. A., & Ogazon, A. G. (2011). The challenges of sustainability education. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(3), 81–107.Google Scholar
  16. Meadows, D., Meadows, D., & Jorgen Randers, J. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  17. Milana, M. (2016). Global polity in adult education and UNESCO: Landmarking, brokering, and framing policy. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 14(2), 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Misiaszek, G. (2012). Transformative environmental education within social justice models: Lessons from comparing adult ecopedagogy within North and South America. In D. N. Aspin, J. Chapman, K. Evans, & R. Bagnall (Eds.), Second international handbook of lifelong learning (pp. 423–440). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Myers, L. (2012). Sustainability education in classrooms. Green. Teacher, 98, 41–44.Google Scholar
  20. Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nussbaum, M. C., & Sen, A. (Eds.). (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  22. OED (Oxford English Dictionary) (2016). “sustainable, adj.”. OED Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/195210?redirectedFrom=sustainable. Accessed 14 April 2016.
  23. Pretorius, S. G. (2014). An education system’s perspective on turning around South Africa’s dysfunctional schools. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(15), 348–358.Google Scholar
  24. Randers, J. (2005). What was the message of the Limits to growth? What did this little book from 1972 really say about the global future? Zurich: The Club of Rome. http://www.flow.ph/l/limitstogrowth/What_was_the_message_of_Limits_to_Growth.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2016.
  25. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 14(3), 223–251.Google Scholar
  27. Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Russell, J. L., Knutson, K., & Crowley, K. (2013). Informal learning organizations as part of an educational ecology: Lessons from collaboration across the formal-informal divide. Journal of Educational Change, 14, 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. SDC (Sustainable Development Commission). (2008). Carbon emissions from schools: Where they arise and how to reduce them. Report. London, etc.: SDC. http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/data/files/publications/Publish_Schools_Carbon_Strategy.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2016.
  31. Seghezzo, L. (2009). The five dimensions of sustainability. Environmental Politics, 18(4), 539–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sen, A. (1989). Development as capability expansion. Journal of Development Planning, 19, 41–58.Google Scholar
  33. Simovska, V., & Mannix McNamara, P. (Eds.). (2015). Schools for health and sustainability: Theory, research and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Singer, M. G. (2003). The ideal of a rational morality: Philosophical compositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh, J. P. (2011). United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO): Creating norms for a complex world. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Tawney, R. H. (1964 [1931]). Equality. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  37. Tawney, R. H. (1966a [1914]). An experiment in democratic education. In R. Hinden (ed.), The radical tradition: Twelve essays on politics, education and literature by R.H. Tawney (pp. 74–85). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  38. Tawney R. H. (1966b [1953]). The Workers’ Educational Association and adult education. In R. Hinden (ed.) The radical tradition: Twelve essays on politics, education and literature. R.H. Tawney (pp. 86–97). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  39. UN (United Nations). (1992a). Rio declaration on environment and development. Annex 1 of the Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992). A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I). New York: UN General Assembly. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm. Accessed 6 July 2016.
  40. UN (1992b). Agenda 21. New York: UN. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2016.
  41. UN (1998). Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. New York: UN. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2016.
  42. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). (2009). Bonn declaration. Formulated at the UNESCO World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development held in Bonn, Germany on 31 March to 2 April. Bonn: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001887/188799e.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2016.
  43. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Our common future [The Brundtland Report]. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. WEA (Workers’ Educational Association). (2013). A brief history of the Workers’ Educational Association. London: WEA. https://issuu.com/weasheffieldwea/docs/history_booklet?e=1305752/1634711. Accessed 5 July 2016.
  45. WEA & University of Oxford (1909). Oxford and working-class education: Being the report of a joint committee of university and working-class representatives on the relation of the university to the higher education of workpeople. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Digitised facsimile of the first edition (1908) available at https://archive.org/stream/oxfordworkingcla00workuoft#page/8/mode/2up. Accessed 5 July 2016.
  46. Webb, S. (2014). Using the experiences of skilled migrants to reflect on continuing education policies for workforce and sustainable development. Encyclopaideia, 18(40), 69–86.Google Scholar
  47. Whitty, G., Power, S., & Halpin, D. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcella Milana
    • 1
  • Palle Rasmussen
    • 2
  • John Holford
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Human SciencesUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Learning and Philosophy, Centre for Education Policy and Evaluation ResearchAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
  3. 3.School of EducationUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations