People Passion programme: Implementing an innovative workplace learning culture through professional development – the case of KPMG Thailand
- 637 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
With a vision that changes within the organisation could only happen through people, Chief Executive Officer Ms. Kaisri Nuengsigkapian led the creation of a successful workplace learning programme, People Passion within KPMG Thailand, which is part of a global network of professional firms providing audit, tax and advisory services. This article employs a case study methodology to describe the culture, the processes and the activities utilised such as creating a common culture, using a “strengths finder tool”, and encouraging individual growth. To develop the case study, data were collected from employees through in-depth interview, observations and document analysis over a four-year period. The findings of the study show that People Passion is effective in reducing communication barriers within the chain of command, between employees and top management, and in encouraging employees to construct group identity and transform themselves. People Passion also serves as a differentiation tool which allows KPMG Thailand to attract new employees, despite accountant scarcity and high competition from other auditing firms. The article concludes with a discussion of issues of transferability and leadership with this programme.
Keywords
Workplace learning Social affordances Organisational policy Identity transformation South-East Asia ThailandRésumé
Le Programme «People Passion» : mettre en œuvre une culture innovante de l’apprentissage au travail à travers le développement professionnel – le cas de KPMG Thaïlande – Portée par l’idée que les changements au sein d’un organisme ne peuvent provenir que des individus, la Présidente Directrice Générale de KPMG Thaïlande, Mme Kaisri Nuengsigkapian, a dirigé la création d’un programme d’apprentissage en situation de travail concluant baptisé People Passion. KPMG est un réseau mondial de cabinets spécialisés en audit, expertise comptable et conseils. Cet article est basé sur la méthodologie de l’étude de cas qui a permis de décrire la culture, les processus et les activités mises en œuvre dans le programme tels que la création d’une culture commune, l’utilisation d’un outil pour détecter les potentiels («strengths finder tool») et l’encouragement au développement individuel. Pour élaborer l’étude de cas, des données ont été collectées des employés par des interviews approfondis, des observations et des analyses de documents durant une période de quatre ans. Les résultats de l’étude montrent que le Programme People Passion est effectif pour la réduction des barrières de communication dans la chaine d’ordre, entre les employés et les directeurs. People Passion apparait aussi comme un outil de différenciation qui permet à KPMG Thailand d’attirer de nouveaux employés, malgré la rareté des professionnels de la comptabilité et la compétition élevée entre les entreprises du secteur. L’article se conclut par une discussion des problèmes de transférabilité et de direction de ce programme.
References
- Antonoaie, N., & Antonoaie, C. (2010). The learning organization. Bulletin of the Transilvania Univerisity of Brasov, Series V: Economic Sciences, 3(52), 105–108.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Billett, S. (2004). Learning through work: Workplace participatory practices. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 109–125). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Billett, S. (2010). Lifelong learning and self: Work, subjectivity and learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Billett, S., & Somerville, M. (2004). Transformations at work: Identity and learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cranton, P. (1996). Professional development as transformative learning: New perspectives for teachers of adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Elkjear, B. (2004). Organizational learning: The “third way”. Management Learning, 35(4), 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evans, K., Guile, D., & Harris, J. (2011). Rethinking work-based learning: For education professionals and professionals who educate. In M. Malloch, et al. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of workplace learning (pp. 149–161). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evans, K., Hodkinson, P., Rainbird, H., & Unwin, L. (2007). Improving workplace learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Filliettaz, L. (2013). Affording learning environments in workplace contexts: An interactional and multimodal perspective. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 32(1), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Toward an ecological psychology. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Guichard, J. (2009). Self-constructing. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gustavsson, M. (2009). Facilitating expansive learning in a public sector organization. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(3), 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harper, S. (1992). What is the leader’s role in the total quality? Tapping the Network Journal, 3(1), 16–17.Google Scholar
- Hater, J. J., & Bass, B. (1988). Superiors’ evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(4), 695–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Hughes, L., & Cairns, L. (2009). Competency-based training: Nortradamus’s nostrum: What happened and where might we ‘capably’ go? Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
- Kaufmann, L., & Clément, F. (2007). How culture comes to mind: From social affordances to cultural analogies. Intellectica, 46(2–3), 221–250.Google Scholar
- Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (1999). Facilitating learning organisations. Brookfield, VT: Gower Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
- Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mulder, M., Weigel, T., & Collins, K. (2009). The concept of competence in the development of vocational education and training in selected EU member states: A critical analysis. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 59(1), 67–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Phornprapha, S., & Chansrichawla, S. (2007). Leadership-supported mentoring: The key to enhancing organizational commitment and retaining newcomers. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 8(2–4), 394–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rath, T. (2007). StrengthsFinder 2.0. New York: Gallup Press.Google Scholar
- Russ-Eft, D. (2011). Towards a meta-theory of learning and performance. In M. Malloch, et al. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of workplace learning (pp. 120–132). London: Sage Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stein, S. (1995). Equipped for the future: A customer-driven vision for adult literacy and lifelong learning. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.Google Scholar
- Stevenson, J. (2002). Concepts of workplace knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Dellen, T., & Slagter, M. (2009). Ontwikkeling van mens en organisatie: De culturele dimensie. Handboek Effectief Opleiden, 50, 13–27.Google Scholar
- Wittorski, R. (2011). The relationship between training and professionalization. Education Permanente, 188, 5–10.Google Scholar