Advertisement

Res Publica

pp 1–6 | Cite as

Response to Umbers: An Instability of the Duty and Right to Vote

  • Ten-Herng LaiEmail author
Comment

Abstract

Lachlan Umbers (Res Publica.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-018-9395-4, 2018a) defends democracy against Jason’s Brennan’s (Philos Q 61:700–724, 2011) competence objection, by showing that voting even incompetently does not violate the rights of others, as the risk imposed is negligible, and furthermore lower than other permissible actions, e.g. driving. I show there are costs in taking this line of argument. Accepting it would make arguing for the duty to vote more difficult in two ways: since voting incompetently is permissible, and not voting imposes less risk than not voting, then not voting is permissible; in terms of fairness, voting incompetently is worse than not voting, if voting incompetently is permissible, then there cannot be a fairness-based duty to vote.

Keywords

Right to vote Duty to vote Risk Competence objection Democracy Fairness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Lachlan Umbers, Geoffrey Brennan, Shang Long Yeo, and Toby Solomon for useful discussion and feedback. This research is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship.

References

  1. Aidt, Toke S., and Bianca Dallal. 2008. Female voting power: the contribution of women’s suffrage to the growth of social spending in Western Europe (1869–1960). Public Choice 134: 391–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brennan, Geoffrey, and Loren Lomasky. 1993. Democracy and decision: The pure theory of electoral preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennan, Jason. 2011. The right to a competent electorate. The Philosophical Quarterly 61: 700–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan, Jason. 2016. Against democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lau, Richard R., Parina Patel, Dalia F. Fahmy, and Robert R. Kaufman. 2014. Correct voting across thirty-three democracies: A preliminary analysis. British Journal of Political Science 44: 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 1997. Voting correctly. American Political Science Review 91: 585–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Martin, Paul S. 2003. Voting’s rewards: Voter turnout, attentive publics, and congressional allocation of federal money. American Journal of Political Science 47: 110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Umbers, Lachlan Montgomery. 2018a. Democratic Legitimacy and the Competence Objection. Res Publica.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-018-9395-4.
  9. Umbers, Lachlan Montgomery. 2018b. Compulsory voting: A defence. The British Journal of Political Science 1–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Philosophy, Research School of Social ScienceAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations