Res Publica

pp 1–6 | Cite as

The Costs of Disobedience: A Reply to Delmas

  • Piero MoraroEmail author


According to the Samaritan principle, we have a duty to rescue others from perils when we can do so at no unreasonable cost to ourself or others. Candice Delmas has argued that this principle generates a duty to engage in civil disobedience, when laws and practices expose people to ‘persistent Samaritan perils’: by engaging in this form of protest, she claims, citizens can contribute to the rescue of the victims of serious injustice. In this article, I contend that her argument confuses duties of rescue with duties of justice. Furthermore, I point out that two central features of civil disobedience, namely, communicativeness and conscientiousness, make it unsuitable as a strategy for ‘rescue operations’. On the one hand, communicative constraints make civil disobedience time-consuming, and dependent on others’ willingness to engage in the communicative exchange. On the other, conscientiousness often requires agents to accept costs well beyond the threshold warranted by the Samaritan principle. Treating civil disobedients akin to ‘good Samaritans’ trivialises the selflessness of their sacrifices.


Civil disobedience Samaritanism Justice 



  1. Brownlee, K. 2012. Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell, S.W. 2012. The Slave Catchers: Enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law, 1850–1860. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  3. Delmas, C. 2014. Samaritanism and Civil Disobedience. Res Publica 20(3): 295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delmas, C. 2018. A Duty to Resist: when Disobedience should be Uncivil. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fabre, C. 2002. Good Samaritanism: A Matter of Justice. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5(4): 128–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lefkowitz, D. 2017. In Defense of Penalizing (but not Punishing) Civil Disobedience. Res Publica 24: 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Moraro, P. 2018. On (not) Accepting the Punishment for Civil Disobedience. Philosophical Quarterly 68(272): 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Sabl, A. 2001. Looking Forward to Justice: Rawlsian Civil Disobedience and its Non-Rawlsian Lessons. Journal of Political Philosophy 9(3): 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith, W. 2013. Civil Disobedience and Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wellman, C., and J. Simmons. 2005. Is There a Duty to Obey the Law?. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wellman, C.H. 2001. Toward a Liberal Theory of Political Obligation. Ethics 111(4): 735–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Law and JusticeCharles Sturt UniversityBathurstAustralia

Personalised recommendations