What is Wrong with Sufficiency?
In this paper, I ask what is wrong with sufficiency. I formulate a generic sufficiency principle in relation to which I discuss possible problems for sufficientarianism. I argue against the arbitrariness–concern, that sufficiency theory need only to identify a possible space for determining a plausible threshold, and I argue against the high–low threshold dilemma concern, that multiple-threshold views can solve this dilemma. I then distinguish between currency-pluralist and currency-monist multiple-threshold views and test them against two different versions of the widely shared ‘ignorance of inequality objection’ to sufficientarianism—a benefit-driven and a burden-driven version. I argue that currency-pluralist sufficiency views are better capable of responding to the former than currency-monist views. However, I show that no existing sufficiency view can provide a plausible response to the burden-driven version. Hence, I conclude that the problem of unequal distribution of burdens above the thresholds represents an overlooked threat to the sufficiency view, in any version.
KeywordsDistributive justice Sufficiency Equality Pluralism
- Claassen, Rutger. 2016. An agency-based capability-theory of justice. European Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12195.
- Cohen, G.A. 2009. Why not socialism?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Fourie, Carina, and Annette Rid (eds). 2016. How much is enough? Sufficiency and thresholds in health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Frankfurt, Harry. 1997. Equality and respect. Social Research 64: 3–15.Google Scholar
- Henriksen, Albæk. 2017. Defending sufficientarianism. Ethical Perspectives 24(2): 181–198.Google Scholar
- Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Powers, Madison, and Ruth Faden. 2006. Social justice: The moral foundations of public health and health policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Raz, Joseph. 1986. The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Segall, Shlomi. 2010. Health, luck, and justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, Richard, and Kate Picket. 2010. The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar