Advertisement

Res Publica

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 475–491 | Cite as

Uncivil Disobedience: Political Commitment and Violence

  • N. P. Adams
Article

Abstract

Standard accounts of civil disobedience include nonviolence as a necessary condition. Here I argue that such accounts are mistaken and that civil disobedience can include violence in many aspects, primarily excepting violence directed at other persons. I base this argument on a novel understanding of civil disobedience: the special character of the practice comes from its combination of condemnation of a political practice with an expressed commitment to the political. The commitment to the political is a commitment to engaging with others as co-members in the on-going political project of living together. I show how such an understanding of civil disobedience is superior to the Rawlsian strain of thought, which focuses on fidelity to law. Rawls was concerned with civil disobedience solely in the context of overriding political obligation. The project of characterizing a contestatory political practice that can be distinguished and used in a wider variety of contexts than Rawls is concerned with, including under illegitimate regimes, beyond the nation-state, or on behalf of anarchism, requires a different understanding of civil disobedience.

Keywords

Civil disobedience Violence Nonviolence Rawls Political obligation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the participants in my Sommersemester 2016 graduate course on civil disobedience for challenging and enlightening discussions and to two anonymous reviewers at this journal for their valuable input.

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1972. Crises of the Republic. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
  2. Bedau, Hugo. 1961. On civil disobedience. Journal of Philosophy 58: 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownlee, Kimberley. 2012. Conscience and conviction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bufacchi, Vittorio. 2005. Two concepts of violence. Political Studies Review 3: 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Celikates, Robin. 2016. Rethinking civil disobedience as a practice of contestation: Beyond the liberal paradigm. Constellations 23: 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chenoweth, Erica, and Maria J. Stephan. 2011. Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coady, C.A.J. 1986. The idea of violence. Journal of Applied Philosophy 3: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, Marshall. 1972. Liberalism and disobedience. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1: 283–314.Google Scholar
  9. Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. Civil disobedience: Litmus test for the democratic constitutional state. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30: 95–116.Google Scholar
  10. Lang, Berel. 1970. Civil disobedience and aonviolence: A distinction with a difference. Ethics 80: 156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lyons, David. 1998. Moral judgment, historical reality, and civil disobedience. Philosophy & Public Affairs 27: 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Markovits, Daniel. 2005. Democratic disobedience. The Yale Law Journal 114: 1897–1952.Google Scholar
  13. May, Todd. 2015. Nonviolent resistance: A philosophical introduction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. Moraro, Piero. 2007. Violent civil disobedience and willingness to accept punishment. Essays in Philosophy 8: 1–14.Google Scholar
  15. Morreall, John. 1976. The justifiability of violent civil disobedience. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6: 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rawls, John. 1999. A theory of justice. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rawls, John. 2005. Political liberalism. Expanded edition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Raz, Joseph. 2009. The authority of law. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sabl, Andrew. 2001. Looking forward to justice: Rawlsian civil disobedience and its non-Rawlsian lessons. The Journal of Political Philosophy 9: 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scheuerman, William E. 2015. Recent theories of civil disobedience: An anti-legal turn? The Journal of Political Philosophy 23: 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scheuerman, William E. 2016. Civil disobedience in the shadows of postnationalization and privatization. Journal of International Political Theory 12: 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, William. 2011. Civil disobedience and the public sphere. The Journal of Political Philosophy 19: 145–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Simmons, A. John. 2010. Disobedience and its objects. Boston University Law Review 90: 1805–1831.Google Scholar
  24. Smart, Brian. 1978. Defining civil disobedience. Inquiry 21: 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Toler, Lindsay. 2014. 16 photos of Ferguson burning. Riverfront times. http://www.riverfronttimes.com/newsblog/2014/11/25/16-photos-of-ferguson-burning?page=2. Accessed 23 Oct 2016.
  26. United States Department of Justice. 2015. Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2016.
  27. Zinn, Howard. 1990. Law, justice and disobedience. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 5: 899–920.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Justitia Amplificata Centre for Advanced StudiesGoethe Universität FrankfurtFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations