Uncivil Disobedience: Political Commitment and Violence
Standard accounts of civil disobedience include nonviolence as a necessary condition. Here I argue that such accounts are mistaken and that civil disobedience can include violence in many aspects, primarily excepting violence directed at other persons. I base this argument on a novel understanding of civil disobedience: the special character of the practice comes from its combination of condemnation of a political practice with an expressed commitment to the political. The commitment to the political is a commitment to engaging with others as co-members in the on-going political project of living together. I show how such an understanding of civil disobedience is superior to the Rawlsian strain of thought, which focuses on fidelity to law. Rawls was concerned with civil disobedience solely in the context of overriding political obligation. The project of characterizing a contestatory political practice that can be distinguished and used in a wider variety of contexts than Rawls is concerned with, including under illegitimate regimes, beyond the nation-state, or on behalf of anarchism, requires a different understanding of civil disobedience.
KeywordsCivil disobedience Violence Nonviolence Rawls Political obligation
Thanks to the participants in my Sommersemester 2016 graduate course on civil disobedience for challenging and enlightening discussions and to two anonymous reviewers at this journal for their valuable input.
- Arendt, Hannah. 1972. Crises of the Republic. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
- Chenoweth, Erica, and Maria J. Stephan. 2011. Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, Marshall. 1972. Liberalism and disobedience. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1: 283–314.Google Scholar
- Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. Civil disobedience: Litmus test for the democratic constitutional state. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30: 95–116.Google Scholar
- Markovits, Daniel. 2005. Democratic disobedience. The Yale Law Journal 114: 1897–1952.Google Scholar
- May, Todd. 2015. Nonviolent resistance: A philosophical introduction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Moraro, Piero. 2007. Violent civil disobedience and willingness to accept punishment. Essays in Philosophy 8: 1–14.Google Scholar
- Rawls, John. 1999. A theory of justice. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Rawls, John. 2005. Political liberalism. Expanded edition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Raz, Joseph. 2009. The authority of law. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Simmons, A. John. 2010. Disobedience and its objects. Boston University Law Review 90: 1805–1831.Google Scholar
- Toler, Lindsay. 2014. 16 photos of Ferguson burning. Riverfront times. http://www.riverfronttimes.com/newsblog/2014/11/25/16-photos-of-ferguson-burning?page=2. Accessed 23 Oct 2016.
- United States Department of Justice. 2015. Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2016.
- Zinn, Howard. 1990. Law, justice and disobedience. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 5: 899–920.Google Scholar