Res Publica

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 11–24 | Cite as

Globalising Love: On the Nature and Scope of Love as a Form of Recognition

Article

Abstract

This article begins by tracing two issues to be kept in mind in discussing the theme of love as far back as Aristotle: on the one hand the polysemy of the term philia in Aristotle, and on the other hand the fact that there is a focal or core meaning of philia that provides order to that polysemy. Secondly, it is briefly suggested that the same issues are, mutatis mutandis, central for understanding the discussion of love or Liebe by Hegel, the central classic reference in debates on recognition. Thirdly, by pointing out a certain ambiguity in Harry Frankfurt’s recent work on love, the article focuses more closely on the thought that love in the simple sense which Aristotle had pinpointed as the focal meaning of philia, which is arguably at the core of Hegel’s discussion of Liebe, and which still forms at least one of the core senses of the term, is a ‘personifying’ attitude of recognition. Finally, drawing on the above points the article addresses the question whether love as a form of recognition is restricted to intimate relations such as those between family-members, ‘lovers’, close friends and so on, or whether it has applications in interhuman relations more broadly. The answer to this question, it is suggested, is essential for the viability of ethically substantial notions of solidarity beyond circles of close acquaintances, whether within the civil society, across nations, or towards future generations.

Keywords

Aristotle Daniel Brudney Harry Frankfurt Hegel Love Solidarity 

References

  1. Aristotle, 1984. Eudemian ethics. In The complete works of Aristotle, ed. Jonathan Barnes, 1922–1981. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle, 2001a. Nicomachean ethics. In The basic works of Aristotle, ed. Richard McKeon, 298–548. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle, 2001b. Rhetoric. In The basic works of Aristotle, ed. Richard McKeon, 1317–1451. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  4. Brudney, Daniel. 2010. Producing for others. In The philosophy of recognition, ed. Hans-Christoph Schmidt am Busch, and F.Zurn Christopher, 151–188. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  5. Frankfurt, Harry. 2006. Taking ourselves seriously and getting it right. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gaita, Raimond. 1999. A common humanity. Melbourne: Text.Google Scholar
  7. Hegel, G.W.F. 1971. Hegel’s philosophy of mind. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  8. Hegel, G.W.F. 1984. Three essays, 1793–1795. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  9. Heins, Volker. 2008. Realizing Honneth. Journal of Global Ethics 4: 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Honneth, Axel. 2007. Love and morality. In Disrespect, 163–181, ed. Axel Honnth. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Honneth, Axel. 2008. Reification: A new look at an old idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Honneth, Axel. 2010. Anerkennung zwischen Staaten. In Das Ich im Wir, ed. Axel Honneth, 181–201. Berlin: Suhrkamp (English translation in Lindemann and Ringmar 2011).Google Scholar
  13. Honneth, Axel. 2011. Das Recht der Freiheit. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  14. Ikäheimo, Heikki. 2004. Analyzing social inclusion in terms of recognitive attitudes. In Social inequality today: Proceedings of the 1st annual conference of the CRSI, eds. Michael Fine, Paul Henman and Nicholas Smith. Macquarie University, http://www.crsi.mq.edu.au/public/download.jsp?id=10598.
  15. Ikäheimo, Heikki. 2007. Recognizing persons. Journal of Consciousness Studies 5–6: 224–247.Google Scholar
  16. Ikäheimo, Heikki. 2011. Holism and normative essentialism in Hegel’s social ontology. In Recognition and social ontology, eds. Heikki Ikäheimo, and Arto Laitinen, 145–209. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ikäheimo, Heikki, and Arto Laitinen. 2010. Esteem for contributions to the common good: The role of personifying attitudes and instrumental value. In The plural states of recognition, ed. Michel Seymour, 98–121. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  18. Laitinen, Arto. 2011. Recognition, acknowledgement and acceptance. In Recognition and social ontology, eds. Heikki Ikäheimo and Arto Laitinen, 309–347. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindemann, Thomas. Forthcoming. Concluding remarks on the empirical study of international recognition. In The struggle for recognition in international relations, eds. Thomas Lindemann and Erik Ringmar. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  20. Marx, Karl. 1975. Comments on James Mill. In Marx-Engels collected works, vol. 3, 211–228. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Provencal, Vernon L. 2001. The family in Aristotle. Animus 6: 3–31, http://www.swgc.mun.ca/animus. Accessed 26 December 2010.Google Scholar
  22. Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Thompson, Simon. Forthcoming. Recognition beyond the state. In Global justice and the politics of recognition, eds. Tony Burns and Simon Thompson. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Vlastos, Gregory. 1973. The individual as object of love in Plato. In Platonic studies, 2nd revised. ed. Gregory Vlastos, 3–34. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Werner, Laura. 2007. The restless love of thinking: The concept of Liebe in G.W.F. Hegel’s philosophy. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Williams, Robert R. 1997. Hegel’s ethics of recognition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Williams, Robert R. 2010. Aristotle and Hegel on recognition and friendship. In The plural states of recognition, ed. Michel Seymour, 20–36. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy, Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations