Res Publica

, 17:369 | Cite as

The Logical Foundation of Fundamental Rights and their Universality



This paper offers a critical analysis of two central issues in Luigi Ferrajoli’s Principia iuris, and more generally of his theory of rights. One is the way in which ‘expectations’ play a crucial role in his deontic theory by establishing the logical basis for his guarantee-based conception of law and rights. The axiomatic way in which Ferrajoli arrives at his conception of fundamental rights is questioned, for it fails to give a full account of the nature of subjective rights. The other issues discussed here is Ferrajoli’s own defence of the universality of fundamental rights, and how this is made to depend on a ‘normative technique’ that one can associate with legal discourse and modern law in Western societies. This, however, poses the problem of how this formal universalism can be reconciled with the intercultural dialogue that Ferrajoli also advocates.


Human rights Fundamental and patrimonial rights Axiomatic method Deontic logic Expectations and guarantees Intercultural dialogue 


  1. Bobbio, Norberto. 1995. The age of rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Feinberg, Joel. 1966. Duties, rights, and claims. American Philosophical Quarterly 3: 137–144.Google Scholar
  3. Feinberg, Joel. 1970. The nature and value of rights. Journal of Value Inquiry 4: 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferrajoli, Luigi. 2001. Diritti fondamentali. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  5. Ferrajoli, Luigi. 2007. Principia iuris. Teoria del diritto e della democrazia. 3 vols. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  6. Hart, Herbert L. A. 2002 [1973]. Bentham on legal rights. In Rights and duties, I, Conceptual analyses of rights and duties, ed. Carl Wellman, 91–121. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Hohfeld, Wesley N. 1964. Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. MacCormick, Neil. 2007. Institutions of law: an essay in legal theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Scuola di GiurisprudenzaUniversità di CamerinoCamerinoItaly

Personalised recommendations