This paper outlines the moral contours of human relationships with companion animals. The paper details three sources of duties to and regarding companion animals: (1) from the animal’s status as property, (2) from the animal’s position in relationships of care, love, and dependency, and (3) from the animal’s status as a sentient being with a good of its own. These three sources of duties supplement one another and not only differentiate relationships with companion animals from wild animals and other categories of domestic animals such as livestock, but they also overlap to provide moral agents with additional reasons for preventing and avoiding harm to companion animals. The paper concludes that not only do owners and bystanders have direct and indirect duties to protect companion animals from harm, but also that these duties have the potential, in some circumstances, to clash with duties owed to the state and fellow citizens.
KeywordsCompanion animals Pets Duties to non-human animals Animal ownership
My thanks to two anonymous reviewers for a number of very helpful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this paper.
- Bearup, Brooke J. 2007. Pets: Property and the paradigm of protection. Journal of Animal Law 3: 173–191.Google Scholar
- Beck, Alan M. 2002. The ecology of stray dogs: a study of free-ranging urban animals. West Lafayette: NotaBell Books.Google Scholar
- Britton, Ann Hartwell. 2006. Bones of contention: Custody of family pets. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers 20: 1–38.Google Scholar
- Callicott, J.Baird. 1989. In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. New York: Suny Press.Google Scholar
- Francione, Gary L. 1996. Animals as property. Animal Law 2: i–vi.Google Scholar
- Gomez, Samantha. 2005. Custody of pets, http://www.osullivandavies.com.au/article.asp?id=8844. Accessed 18 May 2011.
- Kant, Immanuel. [1780–1781] 2004. Duties to animals are indirect. In Animal rights: a historical anthology, eds. Andrew Linzey and Paul Clark, 126–127. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Kelch, Thomas G. 1998. Toward a non-property status for animals. New York University Environmental Law Journal 6: 531.Google Scholar
- Kraut, Richard. 2007. Desire and the human good. In Ethical theory: An anthology, ed. Russ Shafer-Landau, 315–324. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Locke, John.  2003. Two treatises of government and a letter concerning toleration, ed. Ian Shapiro. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Milligan, T. 2010. Beyond animal rights: Food, pets and ethics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Regan, Tom. 2004. The case for animal rights, 2nd ed. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- RSPCA. 2010. Measuring animal welfare in the UK 2005–2009. Horsham: The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.Google Scholar
- Scanlon, Thomas M. 1998. What we owe to each other. Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Singer, Peter. 1977. Animal liberation: Towards an end to man’s inhumanity to animals. London: Granada Publishing.Google Scholar
- Steiner, Hillel. 2002. Silver spoons and golden genes: Talent differentials and distributive justice. In The moral and political status of children, eds. David Archard and Colin M. Macleod, 183–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Welfare of Stray Dogs. 2008. Welfare of Stray Dogs: FAQs. The welfare of stray dogs, http://www.wsdindia.org/faqs.htm. Accessed 3 May 2011.
- Wise, Steven. 2004. Animal rights, one step at a time. In Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions, eds. Cass Sunstein and Martha Nussbaum, 19–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar