Res Publica

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 441–448 | Cite as

To be or not to be: Charles Beitz on the Philosophy of Human Rights

Charles R. Beitz: The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009, 256 pp.
Article

References

  1. Beitz, Charles. 1979/1991. Political theory and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Buchanan, Allen. 2004. Justice, legitimacy, and self-determination: The moral foundations of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, Joshua. 2008. Minimalism about human rights: The most we can hope for? The Journal of Political Philosophy 12: 190–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Griffin, James. 2008. On human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Nickel, James. 2001. Making sense of human rights, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Nussbaum, Martha. 1997. Human rights theory: Capabilities and human rights. Fordham Law Review 66: 273–300.Google Scholar
  7. Rawls, John. 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Raz, Joseph. 2010. Human rights without foundations. In The philosophy of international law, eds. John Tasioulas and Samantha Besson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Tasioulas, John. 2007. The moral reality of human rights. In Freedom from poverty as a human right: Who owes what to the very poor?, ed. Thomas Pogge, 75–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Taylor, Charles. 1999. Conditions of an unforced consensus on human rights. In The East Asian challenge to human rights, ed. R.Bauer Joanne, and Daniel A. Bell, 124–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Walzer, Michael. 1994. Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New CollegeOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations