Advertisement

Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 417–430 | Cite as

Minimising biomass accumulation in biotrickling filters

  • Roger Jay L. De Vela
  • Peter Alan Gostomski
Mini Review
  • 87 Downloads

Abstract

Various approaches can minimize biomass accumulation in biotricking filters (BTF), which can be classified as: (1) physical, (2) chemical and (3) biological. Other approaches include (4) improvement of the bioreactor design and (5) modification of the mode and operational parameters. All of these methods involve either reduction in biomass growth or removal of excess biomass and each method has unique advantages and disadvantages as far as biomass reduction capability, sustainability and ease of integration to the system are concerned, which are compared and contrasted in this review. A careful comparison and analysis of these methods is a requisite to an optimum operation of a BTF system.

Keywords

Biomass accumulation Biomass control Biotrickling filters Clogging Gas biofiltration 

References

  1. Akmirza I, Pascual C, Carvajal A, Perez R, Munoz R, Lebrero R (2017) Anoxic biodegradation of BTEX in a biotrickling filter. Sci Total Environ 587:457–465Google Scholar
  2. Alinejad A, Zamir SM, Shojaosadati SA (2017) Different strategies for transient-state operation of a biotrickling filter treating toluene vapor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101:3451–3462Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez-Hornos FJ, Martinez-Soria V, Marzal P, Izquierdo M, Gabaldon C (2017) Performance and feasibility of biotrickling filtration in the control of styrene industrial air emissions. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 119:329–335Google Scholar
  4. Amin MM, Rahimi A, Bina B, Moghadam FM, Nourmoradi H, Heidari M (2016) Effect of a non-ionic surfactant on xylene removal in a scoria-compost-based biofilter. Clean (Weinh) 44:1759–1765Google Scholar
  5. Auria R, Frere G, Morales M, Acuna ME, Revah S (2000) Influence of mixing and water addition on the removal rate of toluene vapors in a biofilter. Biotechnol Bioeng 68:448–455Google Scholar
  6. Bailey JE, Ollis DF (1986) Biochemical engineering fundamentals, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhaskaran K, Nadaraja AV, Balakrishnan MV, Haridas A (2008) Dynamics of sustainable grazing fauna and effect on performance of gas biofilter. J Biosci Bioeng 105:192–197Google Scholar
  8. Blazquez E, Bezerra T, Lafuente J, Gabriel D (2017) Performance, limitations and microbial diversity of a biotrickling filter for the treatment of high loads of ammonia. Chem Eng J 311:91–99Google Scholar
  9. Brinkmann T, Santonja GG, Yükseler H, Roudier S, Sancho LD (2016) Best available techniques (BAT) reference document for common waste water and waste gas treatment/management systems in the chemical sector. EUR 28112 EN.  https://doi.org/10.2791/37535 Google Scholar
  10. Chen JM, Zhu RY, Yang WB, Zhang LL (2010) Treatment of a BTo-X-contaminated gas stream with a biotrickling filter inoculated with microbes bound to a wheat bran/red wood powder/diatomaceous earth carrier. Bioresour Technol 101:8067–8073Google Scholar
  11. Chen X, Qian W, Kong LJ, Xiong Y, Tian SH (2015) Performance of a suspended biofilter as a new bioreactor for removal of toluene. Biochem Eng J 98:56–62Google Scholar
  12. Cheng Y, He H, Yang C, Zeng G, Li X, Chen H, Yu G (2016) Challenges and solutions for biofiltration of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds. Biotechnol Adv 34:1091–1102Google Scholar
  13. Copelli S, Raboni M, Derudi M, Nano G, Torretta V (2017) Comparison between absorption and biological activity on the efficiency of the biotrickling filtration of gaseous streams containing ammonia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:23207–23218Google Scholar
  14. Cox HHJ, Deshusses MA (1999a) Biomass control in waste air biotrickling filters by protozoan predation. Biotechnol Bioeng 62:216–224Google Scholar
  15. Cox HHJ, Deshusses MA (1999b) Chemical removal of biomass from waste air biotrickling filters: screening of chemicals of potential interest. Water Res 33:9Google Scholar
  16. Cox HHJ, Deshusses MA (2002a) Co-treatment of H2S and toluene in a biotrickling filter. Chem Eng J 87:101–110Google Scholar
  17. Cox HHJ, Deshusses MA (2002b) Effect of starvation on the performance and re-acclimation of biotrickling filters for air pollution control. Environ Sci Technol 36:3069–3073Google Scholar
  18. Cox HHJ, Nguyen TT, Deshusses MA (2000) Toluene degradation in the recycle liquid of biotrickling filters for air pollution control. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 54:133–137Google Scholar
  19. Cox HHJ, Sexton T, Shareefdeen ZM, Deshusses MA (2001) Thermophilic biotrickling filtration of ethanol vapors. Environ Sci Technol 35:2612–2619Google Scholar
  20. Delhomenie MC, Bibeau L, Gendron J, Brzezinski R, Heitz M (2003) A study of clogging in a biofilter treating toluene vapors. Chem Eng J 94:211–222Google Scholar
  21. Deshusses MA, Cox HHJ (2003) Biotrickling filters for air pollution control. In: Bitton G (ed) Encyclopedia of environmental microbiology. Wiley, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1002/0471263397.env105
  22. Devinny JS, Deshusses MA, Webster TS (1999) Biofiltration for air pollution control. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  23. Diks RMM, Ottengraf SPP, van den Oever AHC (1994) The influence of NaCl on the degradation rate of dichloromethane by Hypomicrobium sp. Biodegradation 5:13Google Scholar
  24. Dorado AD, Baeza JA, Lafuente J, Gabriel D, Gamisans X (2012) Biomass accumulation in a biofilter treating toluene at high loads—part 1: experimental performance from inoculation to clogging. Chem Eng J 209:661–669Google Scholar
  25. Estrada JM, Hernandez S, Munoz R, Revah S (2013) A comparative study of fungal and bacterial biofiltration treating a VOC mixture. J Hazard Mater 250:190–197Google Scholar
  26. Flores-Valle SO et al (2011) A comparative study of physical and chemical processes for removal of biomass in biofilters. Molecules 16:6927–6949Google Scholar
  27. Fulazzaky MA, Talaiekhozani A, Abd Majid MZ (2016) Formaldehyde removal mechanisms in a biotrickling filter reactor. Ecol Eng 90:77–81Google Scholar
  28. Garcia-Perez T, Le Borgne S, Revah S (2016) Ozone and hydrogen peroxide as strategies to control biomass in a trickling filter to treat methanol and hydrogen sulfide under acidic conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:10637–10647Google Scholar
  29. Grady J, Leslie CP, Daigger GT, Lim HC (1999) Biological wastewater treatment, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  30. Hajsardar M, Takdastan A, Ahmadi M, Hasani AH (2011) Study of reducing waste biosolids in sequencing batch reactor by ozonation to waste biosolids. Asian J Chem 23:3615–3619Google Scholar
  31. Halecky M, Paca J, Kozliak E, Jones K (2016) Effect of loading types on performance characteristics of a trickle-bed bioreactor and biofilter during styrene/acetone vapor biofiltration. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 51:669–678Google Scholar
  32. Hassan AA, Sorial G (2009) Biological treatment of benzene in a controlled trickle bed air biofilter. Chemosphere 75:1315–1321Google Scholar
  33. He SL, Wang LP, Xu JC, Yin NN (2012) Comparison of the purification performance and microbial community functional diversity in flow-directional-switching and unidirectional-flow biotrickling filters. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 62:1203–1207Google Scholar
  34. Holubar P, Andorfer C, Braun R (1999) Effects of nitrogen limitation on biofilm formation in a hydrocarbon-degrading trickle-bed filter. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:536–540Google Scholar
  35. Hwang JW, Choi CY, Park S, Lee EY (2008) Biodegradation of gaseous styrene by Brevibacillus sp using a novel agitating biotrickling filter. Biotechnol Lett 30:1207–1212Google Scholar
  36. Iliuta I, Larachi F (2006) Dynamics of cells attachment, aggregation, growth and detachment in trickle-bed bioreactors. Chem Eng Sci 61:4893–4908Google Scholar
  37. Jorio H, Bibeau L, Heitz M (2000) Biofiltration of air contaminated by styrene: effect of nitrogen supply, gas flow rate, and inlet concentration. Environ Sci Technol 34:1764–1771Google Scholar
  38. Kan E, Deshusses MA (2003) Development of foamed emulsion bioreactor for air pollution control. Biotechnol Bioeng 84:240–244Google Scholar
  39. Kan E, Deshusses MA (2005) Continuous operation of foamed emulsion bioreactors treating toluene vapors. Biotechnol Bioeng 92:364–371Google Scholar
  40. Kawase Y et al (2014) Improvement of biodegradation in compact co-current biotrickling filter by high recycle liquid flow rate: performance and biodegradation kinetics of ammonia removal. Process Biochem 49:1733–1740Google Scholar
  41. Kennes C, Veiga MC (2002) Inert filter media for the biofiltration of waste gases—characteristics and biomass control. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 1:201–214Google Scholar
  42. Kennes C, Veiga MC (2004) Fungal biocatalysts in the biofiltration of VOC-polluted air. J Biotechnol 113:305–319Google Scholar
  43. Khavanin A, Rezaee A, Mortazavi SB, Asillian H, Nikpay A, Darafshi S (2006) Biotrickling filter of contaminated air with methy tert butyl ether using lava rock media. J Appl Sci Res 2:418–422Google Scholar
  44. Kim S, Deshusses MA (2008) Determination of mass transfer coefficients for packing materials used in biofilters and biotrickling filters for air pollution control. 1. Experimental results. Chem Eng Sci 63:841–855Google Scholar
  45. Koo CCH, Wong KH, Chong WC, Thiam HS (2016) Chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes fouled by organic matters. J Eng Sci Technol 11:987–1000Google Scholar
  46. Lebrero R, Estrada JM, Munoz R, Quijano G (2012) Toluene mass transfer characterization in a biotrickling filter. Biochem Eng J 60:44–49Google Scholar
  47. Lebrero R, Gondim AC, Perez R, Garcia-Encina PA, Munoz R (2014) Comparative assessment of a biofilter, a biotrickling filter and a hollow fiber membrane bioreactor for odor treatment in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 49:339–350Google Scholar
  48. Lee SH, Li CN, Heber AJ, Zheng C (2010) Ethylene removal using biotrickling filters: part i. Experimental description. Chem Eng J 158:79–88Google Scholar
  49. Lee SH, Li CN, Heber AJ, Ni JQ, Huang H (2013) Biofiltration of a mixture of ethylene, ammonia, n-butanol, and acetone gases. Bioresour Technol 127:366–377Google Scholar
  50. Liang W, Huang SB, Yang YL, Jiang R (2012) Experimental and modeling study on nitric oxide removal in a biotrickling filter using Chelatococcus daeguensis under thermophilic condition. Bioresour Technol 125:82–87Google Scholar
  51. Liu DZ, Andreasen RR, Poulsen TG, Feilberg A (2015) A comparative study of mass transfer coefficients of reduced volatile sulfur compounds for biotrickling filter packing materials. Chem Eng J 260:209–221Google Scholar
  52. Martinez-Soria V, Gabaldon C, Penya-Roja JM, Palauj J, Alvarez-Hornos FJ, Sempere F, Soriano C (2009) Performance of a pilot-scale biotrickling filter in controlling the volatile organic compound emissions in a furniture manufacturing facility. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 59:998–1006Google Scholar
  53. Mendoza JA, Prado OJ, Veiga MC, Kennes C (2004) Hydrodynamic behaviour and comparison of technologies for the removal of excess biomass in gas-phase biofilters. Water Res 38:404–413Google Scholar
  54. Mirmohammadi M, Bayat R, Shirazi HK, Sotoudeheian S (2014) Effect of empty bed residence time on biotrickling filter performance: case study-triethylamine. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:183–190Google Scholar
  55. Mirmohammadi M, Sotoudeheian S, Bayat R (2017) Triethylamine removal using biotrickling filter (BTF): effect of height and recirculation liquid rate on BTFs performance. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:1615–1624Google Scholar
  56. Misiaczek O, Paca J, Halecky M, Gerrard AM, Sobotka M, Soccol CR (2007) Start-up and performance characteristics of a trickle bed reactor degrading toluene. Braz Arch Biol Technol 50:871–877Google Scholar
  57. Mohammad BT, Rene ER, Veiga MC, Kennes C (2017) Performance of a thermophilic gas-phase biofilter treating high BTEX loads under steady- and transient-state operation. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 119:289–298Google Scholar
  58. Montes M, Veiga MC, Kennes C (2014) Optimization of the performance of a thermophilic biotrickling filter for alpha-pinene removal from polluted air. Environ Technol 35:2466–2475Google Scholar
  59. Moussavi G, Mohseni M (2008) The treatment of waste air containing phenol vapors in biotrickling filter. Chemosphere 72:1649–1654Google Scholar
  60. Padhi SK, Gokhale S (2014) Biological oxidation of gaseous VOCs—rotating biological contactor a promising and eco-friendly technique. J Environ Chem Eng 2:2085–2102Google Scholar
  61. Pedersen AR, Arvin E (1997) Toluene removal in a biofilm reactor for waste gas treatment. Water Sci Technol 36:69–76Google Scholar
  62. Rahul, Mathur AK, Balomajumder C (2013) Biological treatment and modeling aspect of BTEX abatement process in a biofilter. Bioresour Technol 142:9–17Google Scholar
  63. Ramirez M, Gomez JM, Aroca G, Cantero D (2009) Removal of ammonia by immobilized Nitrosomonas europaea in a biotrickling filter packed with polyurethane foam. Chemosphere 74:1385–1390Google Scholar
  64. Ramirez AA, Garcia-Aguilar BP, Jones JP, Heitz M (2012a) Improvement of methane biofiltration by the addition of non-ionic surfactants to biofilters packed with inert materials. Process Biochem 47:76–82Google Scholar
  65. Ramirez AA, Jones JP, Heitz M (2012b) Methane treatment in biotrickling filters packed with inert materials in presence of a non-ionic surfactant. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87:848–853Google Scholar
  66. Ravi R, Philip L, Swaminathan T (2010) Comparison of biological reactors (biofilter, biotrickling filter and modified RBC) for treating dichloromethane vapors. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:634–639Google Scholar
  67. Rene ER, Montes M, Veiga MC, Kennes C (2011) Styrene removal from polluted air in one and two-liquid phase biotrickling filter: steady and transient-state performance and pressure drop control. Bioresour Technol 102:6791–6800Google Scholar
  68. Rene ER, Mohammad BT, Veiga MC, Kennes C (2012) Biodegradation of BTEX in a fungal biofilter: influence of operational parameters, effect of shock-loads and substrate stratification. Bioresour Technol 116:204–213Google Scholar
  69. Ryu HW, Kim SJ, Cho KS, Lee TH (2008) Toluene degradation in a polyurethane biofilter at high loading. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 13:360–365Google Scholar
  70. Ryu HW, Cho KS, Chung DJ (2010) Relationships between biomass, pressure drop, and performance in a polyurethane biofilter. Bioresour Technol 101:1745–1751Google Scholar
  71. Ryu HW, Cho KS, Lee TH (2011) Reduction of ammonia and volatile organic compounds from food waste-composting facilities using a novel anti-clogging biofilter system. Bioresour Technol 102:4654–4660Google Scholar
  72. Sakuma T, Hattori T, Deshusses MA (2006) Comparison of different packing materials for the biofiltration of air toxics. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 56:1567–1575Google Scholar
  73. Sakuma T, Jinsiriwanit S, Hattori T, Deshusses MA (2008) Removal of ammonia from contaminated air in a biotrickling filter—denitrifying bioreactor combination system. Water Res 42:4507–4513Google Scholar
  74. San-Valero P, Penya-Roja JM, Sempere F, Gabaldon C (2013) Biotrickling filtration of isopropanol under intermittent loading conditions. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 36:975–984Google Scholar
  75. San-Valero P, Penya-Roja JM, Alvarez-Hornos FJ, Gabaldon C (2014) Modelling mass transfer properties in a biotrickling filter for the removal of isopropanol. Chem Eng Sci 108:47–56Google Scholar
  76. Seignez C, Calvelo J, Adler N, Holliger C (2004) Control of biomass growth by nematode-grazing bacteria in a biofilter treating chlorobenzenes. In: European symposium on environmental biotechnology, Eseb 2004. A a Balkema Publishers, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  77. Sempere F, Gabaldon C, Martinez-Soria V, Marzal P, Penya-Roja JM, Alvarez-Hornos FJ (2008) Performance evaluation of a biotrickling filter treating a mixture of oxygenated VOCs during intermittent loading. Chemosphere 73:1533–1539Google Scholar
  78. Shahna FG, Golbabaei F, Hamedi J, Mahjub H, Darabi HR, Shahtaheri SJ (2010) Treatment of benzene, toluene and xylene contaminated air in a bioactive foam emulsion reactor. Chin J Chem Eng 18:113–121Google Scholar
  79. Smith FL, Sorial GA, Suidan MT, Breen AW, Biswas P, Brenner RC (1996) Development of two biomass control strategies for extended, stable operation of highly efficient biofilters with high toluene loadings. Environ Sci Technol 30:1744–1751Google Scholar
  80. Song JH, Kinney KA (2000) Effect of vapor-phase bioreactor operation on biomass accumulation, distribution, and activity: linking biofilm properties to bioreactor performance. Biotechnol Bioeng 68:508–516Google Scholar
  81. Song TT, Yang C, Zeng GM, Yu GL, Xu C (2012) Effect of surfactant on styrene removal from waste gas streams in biotrickling filters. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 87:785–790Google Scholar
  82. Spennati F, Mannucci A, Mori G, Giordano C, Munz G (2017) Moving bed bio trickling filters: an innovative solution for hydrogen sulphide removal from gas streams. Desalination Water Treat 61:215–221Google Scholar
  83. Torretta V, Collivignarelli MC, Raboni M, Viotti P (2015) Experimental treatment of a refinery waste air stream, for BTEX removal, by water scrubbing and biotrickling on a bed of Mitilus edulis shells. Environ Technol 36:2300–2307Google Scholar
  84. Tu YH, Yang CP, Cheng Y, Zeng GM, Lu L, Wang L (2015) Effect of saponins on n-hexane removal in biotrickling filters. Bioresour Technol 175:231–238Google Scholar
  85. Tu X, Li JJ, Feng RF, Sun GP, Guo J (2016) Comparison of removal behavior of two biotrickling filters under transient condition and effect of pH on the bacterial communities. PLoS ONE 11:14Google Scholar
  86. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Priority pollutant list. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/priority-pollutant-list-epa.pdf. Accessed Jan 5 2018
  87. Vallero DA (2008) Fundamentals of air pollution, 4th edn. Elsevier Inc., AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  88. Wang C, Xi JY, Hu HY (2009) Effects of nitrogen source, empty bed residence time and inlet concentration on biofilter removal of chlorobenzene. Eng Life Sci 9:109–115Google Scholar
  89. Wang C, Kong X, Zhang X-Y (2012) Mesophilic and thermophilic biofiltration of gaseous toluene in a long-term operation: performance evaluation, biomass accumulation, mass balance analysis and isolation identification. J Hazard Mater 229–230:94–99Google Scholar
  90. Wang L, Yang CP, Cheng Y, Huang J, He HJ, Zeng GM, Lu L (2013a) Effects of surfactant and Zn (II) at various concentrations on microbial activity and ethylbenzene removal in biotricking filter. Chemosphere 93:2909–2913Google Scholar
  91. Wang LP, He SL, Xu JC, Li J, Mao Z (2013b) Process performance of a biotrickling filter using a flow-directional-switching method. Clean Soil Air Water 41:522–527Google Scholar
  92. Wang XQ, Lu BH, Zhou XX, Li W (2013c) Evaluation of o-xylene and other volatile organic compounds removal using a xylene-acclimated biotrickling filter. Environ Technol 34:2691–2699Google Scholar
  93. Wang L et al (2014) Enhanced removal of ethylbenzene from gas streams in biotrickling filters by Tween-20 and Zn(II). J Environ Sci 26:2500–2507Google Scholar
  94. Wang XQ, Wang QL, Li SJ, Li W (2015) Degradation pathway and kinetic analysis for p-xylene removal by a novel Pandoraea sp strain WL1 and its application in a biotrickling filter. J Hazard Mater 288:17–24Google Scholar
  95. Weber FJ, Hartmans S (1996) Prevention of clogging in a biological trickle-bed reactor removing toluene from contaminated air. Biotechnol Bioeng 50:91–97Google Scholar
  96. Wei ZS, Huang QR, Ye QH, Chen ZY, Li BR, Wang JB (2015) Thermophilic biotrickling filtration of gas-phase trimethylamine. Atmos Pollut Res 6:428–433Google Scholar
  97. Woertz JR, van Heiningen WNM, van Eekert MHA, Kraakman NJR, Kinney KA, van Groenestijn JW (2002) Dynamic bioreactor operation: effects of packing material and mite predation on toluene removal from off-gas. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58:690–694Google Scholar
  98. Won YS, Lee TJ, Wu YPG, Deshusses MA (2004) An environmentally friendly method for controlling biomass in biotrickling filters for air pollution control. J Ind Eng Chem 10:60–65Google Scholar
  99. Wright WF (2005) Transient response of vapor-phase biofilters. Chem Eng J 113:161–173Google Scholar
  100. Xi JY, Saingam P, Gu F, Hu HY, Zhao XF (2015) Effect of continuous ozone injection on performance and biomass accumulation of biofilters treating gaseous toluene. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:33–42Google Scholar
  101. Xue NT, Wang QH, Wu CF, Sun XH, Xie WM (2010a) A pilot field-scale study on biotrickling filter treatment of NH3-containing odorous gases from organic waste composting plants. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 11:629–637Google Scholar
  102. Xue NT, Wang QH, Wu CF, Zhang LH, Xie WM (2010b) Enhanced removal of NH3 during composting by a biotrickling filter inoculated with nitrifying bacteria. Biochem Eng J 51:86–93Google Scholar
  103. Yang H, Allen DG (2005) Potential improvement in biofilter design through the use of heterogeneous packing and a conical biofilter geometry. J Environ Eng ASCE 131:504–511Google Scholar
  104. Yang CP, Suidan MT, Zhu XQ, Kim BJ (2004) Removal of a volatile organic compound in a hybrid rotating drum biofilter. J Environ Eng ASCE 130:282–291Google Scholar
  105. Yang C, Chen H, Zeng G, Yu G, Luo S (2010) Biomass accumulation and control strategies in gas biofiltration. Biotechnol Adv 28:531–540Google Scholar
  106. Yu JM, Chen JM, Wang JD (2006) Removal of dichloromethane from waste gases by a biotrickling filter. J Environ Sci 18:1073–1076Google Scholar
  107. Yu JM, Cai WJ, Cheng ZW, Chen JM (2014) Degradation of dichloromethane by an isolated strain Pandoraea pnomenusa and its performance in a biotrickling filter. J Environ Sci 26:1108–1117Google Scholar
  108. Zaki MF, Tawfik SM (2014) Synthesis, surface properties and antimicrobial activity of some germanium nonionic surfactants. J Oleo Sci 63:921–931Google Scholar
  109. Zamir SM, Babatabar S, Shojaosadati SA (2015) Styrene vapor biodegradation in single- and two-liquid phase biotrickling filters using Ralstonia eutropha. Chem Eng J 268:21–27Google Scholar
  110. Zehraoui A, Wendell D, Sorial GA (2014) Biodegradation of a ternary mixture of hydrophobic and hydrophilic vocs in trickle bed air biofilters. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:14Google Scholar
  111. Zha Y (2012) Microbial diversity of trickling bed air biofilters (TBABs) treating volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Master’s thesis, University of CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  112. Zhang LH, Meng XL, Wang Y, Liu LD (2009) Performance of biotrickling filters for hydrogen sulfide removal under starvation and shock loads conditions. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 10:595–601Google Scholar
  113. Zhang JY, Li L, Liu JX (2015) Thermophilic biofilter for SO2 removal: performance and microbial characteristics. Bioresour Technol 180:106–111Google Scholar
  114. Zhang JY, Li L, Liu JX (2017) Effects of irrigation and water content of packing materials on a thermophilic biofilter for SO2 removal: performance, oxygen distribution and microbial population. Biochem Eng J 118:105–112Google Scholar
  115. Zhou QY, Liang H, Yang SL, Jiang X (2015) The removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas in a microaerobic biotrickling filter using polypropylene carrier as packing material. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 175:3763–3777Google Scholar
  116. Zhou QW, Zhang LL, Chen JM, Xu BC, Chu GW, Chen JF (2016) Performance and microbial analysis of two different inocula for the removal of chlorobenzene in biotrickling filters. Chem Eng J 284:174–181Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Jay L. De Vela
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter Alan Gostomski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Process EngineeringUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Camarines Norte State CollegeDaet, Camarines NortePhilippines

Personalised recommendations