Fertiliser drawn forward osmosis desalination: the concept, performance and limitations for fertigation

  • Sherub Phuntsho
  • Ho Kyong ShonEmail author
  • Seungkwan Hong
  • Sangyoup Lee
  • Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran
  • Jaya Kandasamy
Review Paper


With the world’s population growing rapidly, pressure is increasing on the limited fresh water resources. Membrane technology could play a vital role in solving the water scarcity issues through alternative sources such as saline water sources and wastewater reclamation. The current generation of membrane technologies, particularly reverse osmosis (RO), has significantly improved in performance. However, RO desalination is still energy intensive and any effort to improve energy efficiency increases total cost of the product water. Since energy, environment and climate change issues are all inter-related, desalination for large-scale irrigation requires new novel technologies that address the energy issues. Forward osmosis (FO) is an emerging membrane technology. However, FO desalination for potable water is still a challenge because, recovery and regeneration of draw solutes require additional processes and energy. This article focuses on the application of FO desalination for non-potable irrigation where maximum water is required. In this concept of fertiliser drawn FO (FDFO) desalination, fertilisers are used as draw solutions (DS). The diluted draw solution after desalination can be directly applied for fertigation without the need for recovery and regeneration of DS. FDFO desalination can make irrigation water available at comparatively lower energy than the current desalination technologies. As a low energy technology, FDFO can be easily powered by renewable energy sources and therefore suitable for inland and remote applications. This article outlines the concept of FDFO desalination and critically evaluates the scope and limitations of this technology for fertigation, including suggestions on options to overcome some of these limitations.


Forward osmosis (FO) Desalination Fertiliser draw solution Fertigation Irrigation 



This study was funded by the National Centre for Excellence in Desalination Australia (NCEDA).


  1. Achilli A, Cath TY, Marchand EA, Childress AE (2009) The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination 239(1–3):10–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Achilli A, Cath TY, Childress AE (2010) Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. J Memb Sci 364(1–2):233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson DK (1977) Concentration of dilute industrial wastes by Direct osmosis. Dissertation. University of Rhode IslandGoogle Scholar
  4. ANRA (2009) National water availability. Australiannatural resources data website. Accessed 26 March 2011
  5. Bartels C (2007) Nanofiltration technology and applications. In: Wilf M (ed) The guide to membrane desalination technology. Balaban desalination Publications, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  6. Cath TY, Childress AE, Elimelech M (2006) Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments: review. J Memb Sci 281(2006):70–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cath TY, Hancock NT, Lundin CD, Hoppe-Jones C, Drewes JE (2010) A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water. J Memb Sci 362(1–2):417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheeseman J (1988) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol 87:547–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cosier P, Flannery T, Harding R, Karoly D, Possingham H, Purves R, Saunders D, Thom B, Williams J, Young M, Grafton Q, Kowalick I, Miller C, Stubbs T, Verity F, Walker K (2010) Sustainable diversion in the Murray-Darling basin: an analysis of the options for achieving a sustainable diversion limit in the Murray-Darling basin. Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientist. Accessed 12 July 2011
  10. Elimelech M, Bhattacharjee S (1998) A novel approach for modeling concentration polarization in crossflow membrane filtration based on the equivalence of osmotic pressure model and filtration theory. J Memb Sci 145(2):223–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elimelech M, Phillip WA (2011) The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 333(6043):712–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flemming HC (2002) Biofouling in water systems–cases, causes and countermeasures. Appl Microb Biotechnol 59(6):629–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia-Castello EM, McCutcheon JR (2011) Dewatering press liquor derived from orange production by forward osmosis. J Membr Sci 372(1–2):97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia-Castello EM, McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M (2009) Performance evaluation of sucrose concentration using forward osmosis. J Membr Sci 338(1–2):61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ge Q, Su J, Chung T-S, Amy G (2011) Hydrophilic superparamagnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and performance in forward osmosis processes. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(1):382–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gokel GW (2004) Dean’s handbook of organic chemistry, 2nd edn. pp 2.4–2.5Google Scholar
  17. Goss KF (2003) Environmental flows, river salinity and biodeversity conservation: managing trade-offs in the Murray-Darling basin. Aust J Bot 51:619–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray GT, McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M (2006) Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation. Desalination 197(1–3):1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenlee LF, Lawler DF, Freeman BD, Marrot B, Moulin P (2009) Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today’s challenges. Water Res 43(9):2317–2348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. GWI (Global Water Intellegence) (2011a) FO takes a gaint step forward. Water Desalination Report 46(45)Google Scholar
  21. GWI (Global Water Intellegence) (2011b) Thin film membrane in the work. Water Desalination Report 47(33)Google Scholar
  22. Hails RS (2002) Assessing the risks associated with new agricultural practices. Nature 418(6898):685–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hancock NT, Cath TY (2009) Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ Sci Technol 43(17):6769–6775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanson BR, Simunek J, Hopmans JW (2006) Evaluation of urea-ammonium-nitrate fertigation with drip irrigation using numerical modeling. Agric Water Manag 86(1–2):102–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hassan AM, Al-Sofi MAK, Al-Amoudi AS, Jamaluddin ATM, Farooque AM, Rowaili A, Dalvi AGI, Kither NM, Mustafa GM, Al-Tisan IAR (1998) A new approach to membrane and thermal seawater desalination processes using nanofiltration membranes (Part 1). Desalination 118(1–3):35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holloway RW, Childress AE, Dennett KE, Cath TY (2007) Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. Water Res 41(2007):4005–4014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ife D, Skelt K (2004) Murray-darling basin groundwater status—summary report: 1990–2000. Murray Darling Basin Commission, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  28. Ivnitsky H, Minz D, Kautsky L, Preis A, Ostfeld A, Semiat R, Dosoretz CG (2010) Biofouling formation and modeling in nanofiltration membranes applied to wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 360(1–2):165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jia Y-x, Li H-l, Wang M, Wu L-y, Hu Y-d (2010) Carbon nanotube: possible candidate for forward osmosis. Sep Purif Technol 75(1):55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jury WA, Vaux H (2005) The role of science in solving the world’s emerging water problems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(44):15715–15720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Khan S (2008) Managing climate risks in Australia: options for water policy and irrigation management. Aust J Exp Agric 48:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kravath RE, Davis JA (1975) Desalination of seawater by direct osmosis. Desalination 16(1975):151–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lay WC, Chong TH, Tang CY, Fane AG, Zhang J, Liu Y (2010) Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon. Water Sci Technol 61(4):927–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee KL, Baker RW, Lonsdale HK (1981) Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis. J Membr Sci 8(2):141–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee S, Boo C, Elimelech M, Hong S (2010) Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). J Membr Sci 365(1–2):34–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lu X, Bian X, Shi L (2002) Preparation and characterization of NF composite membrane. J Membr Sci 210(1):3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martinetti CR, Childress AE, Cath TY (2009) High recovery of concentrated RO brines using forward osmosis and membrane distillation. J Membr Sci 331(1–2):31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McBeath TM, McLaughlin MJ, Armstrong RD, Bell M, Bolland MDA, Conyers MK, Holloway RE, Mason SD (2007) Predicting the response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to liquid and granular phosphorus fertilisers in Australian soils. Aust J Soil Res 45(6):448–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCutcheon JR, Elimelech M (2007) Modelling water flux in forward osmosis: implications for improved membrane design. AIChE 53(7):1736–1744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCutcheon JR, McGinnis RL, Elimelech M (2005) A novel ammonia–carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination 174(2005):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCutcheon JR, McGinnis RL, Elimelech M (2006) Desalination by ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis: influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance. J Membr Sci 278(2006):114–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McDonald RI, Green P, Balk D, Fekete BM, Revenga C, Todd M, Montgomery M (2011) Urban growth, climate change, and freshwater availability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(15):6312–6317Google Scholar
  43. McGinnis RL (2002) Osmotic desalination process. U. P. Pending. PCT/US02/02740 (2002)Google Scholar
  44. McGinnis RL, Elimelech M (2007) Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination. Desalination 207(1–3):370–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MDBA (2010) Guide to the proposed Basin Plan: overview. Murray-Darling Basin Authority (MDBA), Canberra, Australia. Accessed 21 May 2011
  46. Melo LF, Bott TR (1997) Biofouling in water systems. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 14(4):375–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mi B, Elimelech M (2010) Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents. J Membr Sci 348(1–2):337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moody CD (1977) Forward osmosis extractors: theory, feasibility and design optimisation. Dissertation. School of renewable natural resources. The University of Arizona, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  49. Moody CD, Kessler JO (1976) Forward osmosis extractors. Desalination 18(1976):283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oliver S, Barber SA (1966) An evaluation of the mechanisms governing the supply of Ca, Mg, K, and Na to soybean roots (Glycine max)1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 30(1):82–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Papadopoulos I, Eliades G (1987) A fertigation system for experimental purposes. Plant Soil 102:141–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Phillip WA, Yong JS, Elimelech M (2010) Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. Environ Sci Technol 44(13):5170–5176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Phocaides A (2007) Handbook on pressurized irrigation techniques. Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  54. Phuntsho S, Listowski A, Shon HK, Le-Clech P, Vigneswaran S (2011a) Membrane autopsy of a 10 year old hollow fibre membrane from Sydney Olympic Park water reclamation plant. Desalination 271(1–3):241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Phuntsho S, Shon HK, Hong SK, Lee SY, Vigneswaran S (2011b) A novel low energy fertilizer driven forward osmosis desalination for direct fertigation: evaluating the performance of fertilizer draw solutions. J Membr Sci 375(2011):172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Plusquellec H (2002) Is the daunting challenge of irrigation achievable?, vol 51. Wiley, Londan, pp 185–198Google Scholar
  57. Saren Q, Qiu CQ, Tang CY (2011) Synthesis and characterization of novel forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly. Environ Sci Technol 45(12):5201–5208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Semiat R (2008) Energy issues in desalination processes. Environ Sci Technol 42(22):8193–8201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Service RF (2006) Desalination freshens up. Science 313(5790):1088–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Setiawan L, Wang R, Li K, Fane AG (2011) Fabrication of novel poly(amide-imide) forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes with a positively charged nanofiltration-like selective layer. J Membr Sci 369(1–2):196–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M, Georgiadis JG, Marinas BJ, Mayes AM (2008) Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452(7185):301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Subramani A, Badruzzaman M, Oppenheimer J, Jacangelo JG (2011) Energy minimization strategies and renewable energy utilization for desalination: a review. Water Res 45(5):1907–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tan CH, Ng HY (2008) Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations. J Membr Sci 324(1–2):209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tan CH, Ng HY (2010) A novel hybrid forward osmosis–nanofiltration (FO-NF) process for seawater desalination: draw solution selection and system configuration. Desalination Water Treat 13(2010):356–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tiraferri A, Yip NY, Phillip WA, Schiffman JD, Elimelech M (2011) Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and structure. J Membr Sci 367(1–2):340–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. UN (2009) World population prospects: the 2008 revision Highlights. Department of Economic and Social Affairs - Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.210. Population Division, United Nations, New York. Accessed 15 July 2011
  67. UNFPA (2011) State of world population 2011. Information and External Relations Division, United Nations Population Fund.
  68. Van der Bruggen B, Vandecasteele C (2002) Modelling of the retention of uncharged molecules with nanofiltration. Water Res 36(5):1360–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang KY, Ong RC, Chung T-S (2010a) Double-skinned forward osmosis membranes for reducing internal concentration polarization within the porous sublayer. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(10):4824–4831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang R, Shi L, Tang CY, Chou S, Qiu C, Fane AG (2010b) Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. J Membr Sci 355(1–2):158–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ward FA, Pulido-Velazquez M (2008) Water conservation in irrigation can increase water use. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(47):18215–18220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wei J, Qiu C, Tang CY, Wang R, Fane AG (2011) Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes. J Membr Sci 372(1–2):292–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Xiao D, Tang CY, Zhang J, Lay WCL, Wang R, Fane AG (2011) Modeling salt accumulation in osmotic membrane bioreactors: implications for FO membrane selection and system operation. J Membr Sci 366(1–2):314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yip NY, Tiraferri A, Phillip WA, Schiffman JD, Elimelech M (2010) High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environ Sci Technol 44(10):3812–3818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhao S, Zou L, Mulcahy D (2011). Brackish water desalination by a hybrid forward osmosis–nanofiltration system using divalent draw solute. Desalination (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sherub Phuntsho
    • 1
  • Ho Kyong Shon
    • 1
    Email author
  • Seungkwan Hong
    • 2
  • Sangyoup Lee
    • 2
  • Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran
    • 1
  • Jaya Kandasamy
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Technology, Sydney (UTS)BroadwayAustralia
  2. 2.School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural EngineeringKorea UniversitySungbuk-Gu, SeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations