Phytoremediation of mine tailings in temperate and arid environments

Review Paper


Phytoremediation is an emerging technology for the remediation of mine tailings, a global problem for which conventional remediation technologies are costly. There are two approaches to phytoremediation of mine tailings, phytoextraction and phytostabilization. Phytoextraction involves translocation of heavy metals from mine tailings to the plant shoot biomass followed by plant harvest, while phytostabilization focuses on establishing a vegetative cap that does not shoot accumulate metals but rather immobilizes metals within the tailings. Phytoextraction is currently limited by low rates of metal removal which is a combination of low biomass production and insufficiently high metal uptake into plant tissue. Phytostabilization is currently limited by a lack of knowledge of the minimum amendments required (e.g., compost, irrigation) to support long-term plant establishment. This review addresses both strategies within the context of two specific climate types: temperate and arid. In temperate environments, mine tailings are a source of metal leachates and acid mine drainage that contaminate nearby waterways. Mine tailings in arid regions are subject to eolian dispersion and water erosion. Examples of phytoremediation within each of these environments are discussed. Current research suggests that phytoextraction, due to high implementation costs and long time frames, will be limited to sites that have high land values and for which metal removal is required. Phytostabilization, due to lower costs and easier implementation, will be a more commonly used approach. Complete restoration of mining sites is an unlikely outcome for either approach.


Arid Halophytes Hyperaccumulators Mine tailings Phytoextraction Phytoremediation Phytostabilization Semi-arid Temperate 


  1. Audet P, Charest C (2007) Heavy metal phytoremediation from a meta-analytical perspective. Environ Pollut 147:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker AJM, Reeves RD, Hajara ASM (1994) Heavy metal accumulation and tolerance in British populations of the metallophyte Thlaspi caerulescens J. & C. Presl (Brassicaceae). New Phytol 127:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker AJM, McGrath SP, Reeves RD, Smith JAC (2000) Metal hyperaccumulator plants: a review of the ecology and physiology of a biological resource for phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils. In: Terry N, Bañuelos G (eds) Phytoremediation of contaminated soil and water. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bech J, Poschenrieder C, Barcelo J, Lansac A (2002) Plants from mine spoils in the South American area as potential sources of germplasm for phyotremediation technologies. Acta Biotechnol 1–2:5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett LE, Burkhead JL, Hale KL, Terry N, Pilon M, Pilon-Smits EAH (2003) Analysis of transgenic Indian mustard plants for phytoremediation of metal-contaminated mine tailings. J Environ Qual 32:432–440Google Scholar
  6. Berti WWR, Cunningham SD (2000) Phytostabilization of metals. In: Raskin I, Ensley BD (eds) Phytoremediation of toxic metals – using plants to clean up the environment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, pp 71–88Google Scholar
  7. Bradshaw AD, Humphreys MO, Johnson MS (1978) The value of heavy metal tolerance in the revegetation of metalliferous mine wastes. In: Goodman GT, Chadwick MJ (eds) Environmental management of mineral wastes. Sijthoff & Noordhoff, The Netherlands, pp 311–314Google Scholar
  8. Brooks RR (1998) Plants that hyperaccumulate heavy metals: their role in phytoremediation, microbiology, archaeology, mineral exploration and phytomining. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Castellanos AE, Martinez MJ, Llano JM, Halvorson WL, Espiricueta M, Espejel I (2005) Successional trends in Sonoran Desert abandoned agricultural fields in northern Mexico. J Arid Environ 60:437–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castro-Larragoitia J, Kramar U, Puchelt H (1997) 200 years of mining activities at La Paz, San Luis Potosi, Mexico – consequences for environment and geochemical exploration. J Geochem Explor 58:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conesa HM, Faz A, Arnaldos R (2006) Heavy metal accumulation and tolerance in plants from mine tailings of the semiarid Cartagena-La Union Mining District (SE Spain). Sci Total Environ 366:1–11Google Scholar
  12. Conesa HM, Garcia G, Faz A, Arnaldos R (2007a) Dynamics of metal tolerant plant communities’ development in mine tailings from the Cartagena-La Union Mining District (SE Spain) and their interest for further revegetation purposes. Chemosphere 68:1180–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conesa HM, Robinson BH, Schullin R, Nowack B (2007b) Growth of Lygeum spartum in acid mine tailings: response of plants developed from seedlings, rhizomes, and at field conditions. Environ Pollut 145:700–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Craw D, Rufaut C, Haffert L, Paterson L (2007) Plant colonization and arsenic uptake on high arsenic mine wastes, New Zealand. Water Air Soil Pollut 179:351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cunningham SD, Berti WWR (2000) Phytoextraction and phytostabilization: technical, economic, and regulatory considerations of the soil-lead issue. In: Terry N, Banuelos G (eds) Phytoremediation of contaminated soil and water. CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  16. Cunningham SD, Berti WR, Huang JWW (1995) Phytoremediation of contaminated soils. Trends Biotechnol 13:393–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Del Rio-Celestino M, Font R, Moreno-Rojas R, De Haro-Bailon A (2006) Uptake of lead and zinc by wild plants growing on contaminated soils. Ind Crop Prod 24:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deng JC, Liao B, Ye M, Deng DM, Lan CY, Shu WS (2007) The effects of heavy metal pollution on genetic diversity in zinc/cadmium hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii populations. Plant Soil 297:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ernst WHO (2005) Phytoextraction of mine wastes – options and impossibilities. Chem Erde Geochem 65(S1):29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO (Food, Agriculture Organization) (1989) Arid zone forestry: a guide for field technicians. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  21. Flores-Tavizon E, Alarcon-Herrera MT, Gonzalez-Elizondo S, Olguin EJ (2003) Arsenic tolerating plants from mine sites and hot springs in the semi-arid region of Chihuahua, Mexico. Acta Biotechnol 23:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frérot H, Lefèbvre C, Gruber W, Collin C, Santos A, Escarré J (2006) Specific interactions between local metallicolous plants improve the phytostabilization of mine soils. Plant Soil 282:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gebauer RLE, Ehleringer JR (2000) Water and nitrogen uptake patterns following moisture pulses in a cold desert community. Ecology 81:695–712Google Scholar
  24. Glick BR (2003) Phytoremediation: synergistic use of plants and bacteria to clean up the environment. Biotechnol Adv 21:383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gonzalez RC, Gonzalez-Chavez MCA (2006) Metal accumulation in wild plants surrounding mining wastes: soil and sediment remediation (SSR). Environ Pollut 144:84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IIED & WBCSD (International Institute for Environment and Development & World Business Council of Sustainable Development) (2002) Breaking new ground: the report of mining, minerals, and sustainable development project. Earthscan Publications Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Jefferson LV (2004) Implications of plant density on the resulting community structure of mine site land. Restor Ecol 12:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johansson L, Xydas C, Messios N, Stoltz E, Greger M (2005) Growth and Cu accumulation by plants grown on Cu containing mine tailings in Cyprus. Appl Geochem 20:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jordan FL, Robin-Abbott M, Maier RM, Glenn EP (2002) A comparison of chelator-facilitated metal uptake by a halophyte and a glycophyte. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:2698–2704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keller C, Hammer D, Kayser A, Richner W, Brodbeck M, Sennhauser M (2003) Root development and heavy metal phytoextraction efficiency: comparison of different plant species in the field. Plant Soil 249:67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knight B, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP, Shen ZG (1997) Zinc and cadmium uptake by the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens in contaminated soils and its effects on the concentration and chemical speciation of metals in soil solution. Plant Soil 197:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kramer PA, Zabowski D, Scherer G, Everett RL (2000) Native plant restoration of copper mine tailings: I. Substrate effect on growth and nutritional status in a greenhouse study. J Environ Qual 29:1762–1769Google Scholar
  33. Krzaklewski W, Pietrzykowski M (2002) Selected physico-chemical properties of zinc and lead ore tailings and their biological stabilisation. Water Air Soil Pollut 141:125–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leita L, De Nobili M, Pardini G, Ferrari F, Sequi S (1989) Anomalous contents of heavy metals in soils and vegetation of a mine area in S.W. Sardinia, Italy. Water Air Soil Pollut 48:423–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li MS (2006) Ecological restoration of mineland with particular reference to the metalliferous mine wasteland in China: a review of research and practice. Sci Total Environ 357:38–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lottermoser BG, Ashley PM, Costelloe MT (2005) Contaminant dispersion at the rehabilitated Mary Kathleen uranium mine, Australia. Environ Geol 48:748–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lutts S, Lefevre I, Delperee C, Kivits S, Dechamps C, Robledo A, Correal E (2004) Heavy metal accumulation by the halophyte species Mediterranean saltbush. J Environ Qual 33:1271–1279Google Scholar
  38. Madejon E, de Mora AP, Felipe E, Burgos P, Cabrera F (2006) Soil amendments reduce trace element solubility in a contaminated soil and allow regrowth of natural vegetation. Environ Pollut 139:40–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mains D, Craw D, Rufaut CG, Smith CMS (2006) Phytostabilization of gold mine tailings from New Zealand. Part 2: experimental evaluation of arsenic mobilization during revegetation. Int J Phytorem 8:163–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press Inc., San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  41. Mbila MO, Thompson ML (2004) Plant-available zinc and lead in mine spoils and soils at the mines of Spain, Iowa. J Environ Qual 33:553–558Google Scholar
  42. Meerts P, Van Isacker N (1997) Heavy metal tolerance and accumulation in metallicolous and non-metallicolous populations of Thlaspi caerulescens from continental Europe. Plant Ecol 133:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mendez MO, Glenn EP, Maier RM (2007) Phytostabilization potential of quailbush for mine tailings: growth, metal accumulation, and microbial community changes. J Environ Qual 36:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moynahan OS, Zabinski CA, Gannon JE (2002) Microbial community structure and carbon-utilization diversity in a mine tailings revegetation study. Restor Ecol 10:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mummey DL, Stahl PD, Buyer JS (2002a) Microbial biomarkers as an indicator of ecosystem recovery following surface mine reclamation. Appl Soil Ecol 21:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mummey DL, Stahl PD, Buyer JS (2002b) Soil microbiological properties 20 years after surface mine reclamation: spatial analysis of reclaimed and undisturbed sites. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1717–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Munshower FF (1994) Practical handbook of disturbed land revegetation. Lewis Publishing, Boca RattonGoogle Scholar
  48. Neal C, Whitehead PG, Jeffery H, Neal M (2005) The water quality of the River Carnon, west Cornwall, November 1992 to March 1994: the impacts of Wheal Jane discharges: bioremediation of acid Mine drainage: the Wheal Jane Mine Wetlands Project. Sci Total Environ 338:23–39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. NRC (National Research Council) (2005) Mineral tolerance of animals. National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  50. OIG-USEPA (Office of Inspector Genera) (2004) Nationwide identification of hardrock mining sites. Report No. 2004-P-00005. USEPA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  51. Osmond CB, Bjorkman O, Anderson DJ (1980) Physiological processes in plant ecology: toward a synthesis with Atriplex. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA (2007) Updated world map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:1633–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pichtel J, Salt CA (1998) Vegetative growth and trace metal accumulation on metalliferous wastes. J Environ Qual 27:618–624Google Scholar
  54. Pierzynski GM, Lambert M, Hetricck BAD, Weeney DW, Erickson LE (2002) Phytostabilization of metal mine tailings using tall fescue. Pract Periodical Haz Toxic Radioactive Waste Manage 6:212–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Piha MI, Vallack HW, Michael N, Reeler BM (1995) A low-input approach to vegetation establishment on mine and coal ash wastes in semiarid regions. 2. Lagooned pulverized fuel ash in Zimbabwe. J Appl Ecol 32:382–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pilon-Smits EAH, Freeman JL (2006) Environmental cleanup using plants: biotechnological advances and ecological considerations. Front Ecol Environ 4:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pilon-Smits E, Pilon M (2002) Phytoremediation of metals using transgenic plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 21:439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pond AP, White SA, Milczarek M, Thompson TL (2005) Accelerated weathering of biosolid-amended copper mine tailings. J Environ Qual 34:1293–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rosario K, Iverson SL, Henderson DA, Chartrand S, McKeon C, Glenn EP, Maier RM (2007) Bacterial community changes during plant establishment at the San Pedro River mine tailings site. J Environ Qual 36:1249–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sabey BR, Pendleton RL, Webb BL (1990) Effect of municipal sewage-sludge application on growth of two reclamation shrub species in copper mine spoils. J Environ Qual 19:580–586Google Scholar
  61. Salt DE, Pickering IJ, Prince RC, Gleba D, Dushenkov S, Smith RD, Raskin I (1997) Metal accumulation by aquacultured seedlings of Indian mustard. Environ Sci Technol 31:1636–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schmidt U (2003) Enhancing phytoextraction: the effect of chemical soil manipulation on mobility, plant accumulation, and leaching of heavy metals. J Environ Qual 32:1939–1954Google Scholar
  63. SERI-SPWG (Society for Ecological Restoration International Science & Policy Working Group) (2004) The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. & Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International
  64. Shu WS, Ye ZH, Lan CY, Zhang ZQ, Wong MH (2001) Acidification of lead/zinc mine tailings and its effect on heavy metal mobility. Environ Int 26:389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith RAH, Bradshaw AD (1972) Stabilization of toxic mine wastes by the use of tolerant plant populations. Trans Inst Min Metall A 81:230–237Google Scholar
  66. Smith RAH, Bradshaw AD (1979) The use of metal tolerant plant populations for the reclamation of metalliferous wastes. J Appl Ecol 16:595–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Snow AA, Andow DA, Gepts P, Hallerman EM, Power A, Tiedje JM, Wolfenbarger LL (2005) Genetically engineered organisms and the environment: current status and recommendations. Ecol Appl 10:377–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stevenson FJ, Cole MA (1999) Cycles of soil: carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, micronutrients. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  70. Tordoff GM, Baker AJM, Willis AJ (2000) Current approaches to the revegetation and reclamation of metalliferous mine wastes. Chemosphere 41:219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Turnau K, Henriques FS, Anielska T, Renker C, Buscot F (2007) Metal uptake and detoxification mechanisms in Erica andevalensis growing in a pyrite mine tailing. Environ Exp Bot 61:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2004a) Abandoned mine lands team: Reference notebook. URL
  73. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2004b) Test methods for evaluating solid waste. EPA SW-846. US Government Print Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  74. Van Rensburg L, Morgenthal T (2004) The effect of woodchip waste on vegetation establishment during platinum tailings rehabilitation. S Afr J Sci 100:294–300Google Scholar
  75. Von Willert FJ, Stehouwer RC (2003) Compost and calcium surface treatment effects on subsoil chemistry in acidic minespoil columns. J Environ Qual 32:781–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Warhurst A (2000) Mining, mineral processing, and extractive metallurgy: an overview of the technologies and their impact on the physical environment. In: Warhurst A, Noronha L (eds) Environmental policy in mining: corporate strategy and planning for closure. CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  77. Watson IW, Westoby M, Holm AM (1997) Continuous and episodic components of demographic change in arid zone shrubs: models of two Eremophila species from Western Australia compared with published data on other species. J Ecol 85:833–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Whiting SN, Reeves RD, Richards D, Johnson MS, Cooke JA, Malaisse F et al (2004) Research priorities for conservation of metallophyte biodiversity and their potential for restoration and site remediation. Restor Ecol 12:106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams DJ, Currey NA (2002) Engineering closure of an open pit gold operation in a semi-arid climate. Int J Min Reclamat Environ 16:270–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Windsor DM, Clements A (2001) A germination and establishment field trial of Themeda australis (kangaroo grass) for mine site restoration in the Central Tablelands of New South Wales. Restor Ecol 9:104–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wolfe AK, Bjornstad DJ (2002) Why would anyone object? An exploration of social aspects of phytoremediation acceptability. Crit Rev Plant Sci 21:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wolfenbarger LL, Phifer PR (2000) Biotechnology and ecology-the ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science 290:2088-2093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wong MH (2003) Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils. Chemosphere 50:775–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wood MK, Buchanan BA, Skeet W (1995) Shrub preference and utilization by big game on New Mexico reclaimed mine land. J Range Manage 48:431–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wu J, Hsu FC, Cunningham SD (1999) Chelate-assisted Pb phytoextraction: Pb availability, uptake, and translocation constraints. Environ Sci Technol 33:1898–1904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ye ZH, Wong JWC, Wong MH, Lan CY, Baker AJM (1999) Lime and pig manure as ameliorants for revegetating lead/zinc mine tailings: a greenhouse study. Bioresour Technol 69:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ye ZH, Shu WS, Zhang ZQ, Lan CY, Wong MH (2002) Evaluation of major constraints to revegetation of lead/zinc mine tailings using bioassay techniques. Chemosphere 47:1103–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhao FJ, Lombi E, McGrath SP (2003) Assessing the potential for zinc and cadmium phytoremediation with the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant Soil 249:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Soil, Water, and Environmental ScienceUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations