Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants

Article

Abstract

A variety of test procedures for determination of anaerobic biodegradability have been reported. This paper reviews the methods developed for determination of anaerobic biodegradability of macro-pollutants. Main focus is paid to the final mineralization of organic compounds and the methane potential of compounds. Hydrolysis of complex substrates is also discussed. Furthermore, factors important for anaerobic biodegradation are shortly discussed.

Keywords

anaerobic biodegradation assays hydrolysis macropollutants methane potential 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adani F, Calcaterra E & Malagutti L (2001). Preparation of a test for estimating biogas production from pretreated urban waste. In: Proceeding Sardinia 2001 Eight International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, Cagliari, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA ,  1992Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and WastewaterAmerican Public Health AssociationWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelidaki, I, Ahring, BK 1992Effects of free long chain fatty acids on thermophilic anaerobic digestionAppl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.37808812Google Scholar
  4. Angelidaki, I, Ahring, BK 1993Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: the effect of ammoniaAppl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.38560564Google Scholar
  5. Angelidaki, I Ahring BK 1994Anaerobic digestion of manure at different ammonia loads: effect of temperatureWat. Res.28727731Google Scholar
  6. Angelidaki, I, Petersen, SP, Ahring, BK 1990Effects of lipids on thermophilic anaerobic digestion and reduction of lipid inhibition upon addition of bentoniteAppl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.33469472Google Scholar
  7. Batstone, D 2000High rate anaerobic treatment of complex wastewaterPh.D. ThesisThe university of QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  8. Buswell EG Neave SL (1930) Laboratory studies of sludge digestion. Illinois Div. of State Wat. Survey 30Google Scholar
  9. Chaplin, MF, Bucke, C 1990Enzyme TechnologyCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, YR, Hashimoto, AG 1978Kinetics of Methane FermentationBiotechnol. Bioeng. Symp.8269282Google Scholar
  11. Chyi, YT, Dague, RR 1994Effects of particulate size in anaerobic acidogenesis using cellulose as a sole carbon sourceWater Env. Res.66670678Google Scholar
  12. Dolfing, J, Bloemen, GBM 1985Activity measurement as a tool to characterize the microbial composition of methanogenic environmentsJ. Microbiol. Meth.4112Google Scholar
  13. Eastman, JA, Ferguson, JF 1981Solubilization of particulate organic carbon during the acid phase of anaerobic digestionJWPCF53253266Google Scholar
  14. Eleazer, WE, Odle, WSIII, Wang, Y.-S, Barlaz, MA 1997Biodegradability of municipal solid waste components in laboratory-scale landfillsEnviron. Sci. Technol.31911917Google Scholar
  15. El-Mashad, H 2003Solar Thermophilic Reactor (STAR) for Renewable Energy ProductionPh.D. ThesisWageningen UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Elmitwalli, TA 2000Anaerobic treatment of domestic sewage at low temperaturePh.D. ThesisWageningen Agricultural UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Glenn, AR 1976Production of extra-cellular proteins by bacteria, AnnRev. Microbiol.304162Google Scholar
  18. Hansen TL, Schmidt JE, Angelidaki I, Marca E, Jansen JLC, Mosb{\ae } k H Christensen TH. Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste. Waste Manag. (in press)Google Scholar
  19. Harries CR, Cross CJ & Smith R (2001) Development of a BMP test and application to testing of MSW samples. In: Proceeding Sardinia 2001 Eight International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, Cagliari, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  20. Harmon, JL, Svoronos, SA, Lyberatos, G, Chynoweth, D 1993Adaptive temperature optimization of continuous digestersBiomass Bioenergy5279288Google Scholar
  21. Hashimoto, AG, Varel, VH, Chen, YR 1981Ultimate methane yield from beef cattle manure: effect of temperature, ration costituents, antibiotics and manure ageAgricul. Wastes3241256Google Scholar
  22. Heerenklage J & Stegmann R (2001) Comparison of test systems for the determination of the gas potential from waste. In: Proceeding Sardinia 2001 Eight International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, Cagliari, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  23. Hills DJ Nakano K (1984) Effects of particle size on anaerobic digestion of tomato solids waste. Agricul. Wastes 285–295Google Scholar
  24. Hobson, PN 1987A model of some aspects of microbial degradation of particulate substrateJ. Ferment. Technol.65431439Google Scholar
  25. Jain, S, Lala, AL, Bathia, SK Kudchadker AP 1992Modelling hydrolysis controlled anaerobic digestionJ. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.53337344Google Scholar
  26. Kaluzny, MA, Duncan, LA, Merrit, MV, Epps, DE 1985Rapid separation of lipids classes in high yield and purity using bonded phase columnsJ. Lipid Res.26135140Google Scholar
  27. Kaparaju, PLN, Rintala, JA 2003Effects of temperature on post-methanation of degassed dairy cow manure in a farm-scale biogas conceptEniron. Technol.2413151321Google Scholar
  28. Madigan, MT, Marinko, JM, Parker, J 2000Brock Biology of MicroorganismsPrentice HallNY9th ednGoogle Scholar
  29. McInerney, MJ, Bryant, MP, Stafford, DA 1980

    Metabolic stages and energetics of microbial anaerobic digestion

    Stafford, DAWheatley, BIHudges, DE eds. Anaerobic DigestionApplied Science LtdLondon9198
    Google Scholar
  30. Miron Y, Zeeman G, van Lier JB. Lettinga G (2000) The role of sludge retention time in the hydrolysis and acidification of lipids, carbohydrates and proteins during digestion of primary sludge in CSTR systems Wat. Res. 34(5): 1705–1713Google Scholar
  31. Morgenroth, E, Kommedal, R, Harremoës, P 2002Processes and modeling of hydrolysis of particulate organic matter in aerobic wastewater treatment–a reviewWat Sci. Technol.452540Google Scholar
  32. Owen, MF, Stuckey, DC, Healy, JB, Young, LY, McCarthy, PL 1979Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicityWat. Res.13485492Google Scholar
  33. Owens, JM, Chynoweth, DP 1993Biochemical methane potential of municipal solid waste componentsWat. Sci. Technol.27114Google Scholar
  34. Palmowski LM, Mundhecke RC, Muller JA & Schwedes HJ (2001) Importance of substrate surface area in the kinetics of organic solids degradation In: 9th World Congress Anaerobic Digestion Antwerp September 2–6, Proceedings part 2, pp 163–168Google Scholar
  35. Pavlostathis, SG, Giraldo-Gomez, E 1991Kinetics of anaerobic treatmentWat Sci. Technol.243559Google Scholar
  36. Philip, H, Manoir, S, Rambaud, A, Philippi, LS 1993Septic tank sludges: accumulation rate and biochemical characteristics, WatSci. Technol.285764Google Scholar
  37. Rozzi A Remigi E Anaerobic biodegradability. In: 9th World Congress, Anaerobic digestion 2001. Belgium, Workshop 3 Harmonisation of anaerobic activity and biodegradation assays. 9-2-2001. Conference ProceedingGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanders, WTM, Geerink, M, Zeeman, G, Lettinga, G 2000Anaerobic hydrolysis kinetics of particulate substratesWat Sci. Technol.411724Google Scholar
  39. WTM, Sanders, AHM, Veekens, Zeeman, G, Lier, JB 2002a

    Analysis and optimization of the AD process of OFMSW

    Mata-Alvarez, J eds. Biomethanization of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid WastesIWA publishingLondon6389
    Google Scholar
  40. Sanders, WTM, Zeeman, G, Lettinga, G 2002bHydrolysis kinetics of dissolved polymersWat Sci. Technol.4599104Google Scholar
  41. Song H (2003) Characterisation of microbial community structure within anaerobic biofilms on municipal solid waste Ph.D. Thesis University of QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  42. Soto, M, Mendez, R, Lema, JM 1993Methanogenic activity testsTheoretical basis and experimental setup. Wat. Res.27850857Google Scholar
  43. Tong, X, Smith, LH, McCarthy, PL 1990Methane fermentation of selected lignocellulosic materialsBiomass21239255Google Scholar
  44. Westermann, P, Ahring, BK, Mah, RA 1989Temperature compensation in Methanosarcina barkeri by modulation of hydrogen and acetate affinityAppl. Environ. Microbiol.5512621266Google Scholar
  45. Valentini, A, Garuti, G, Rozzi, A Tilche A 1997Anaerobic degradation kinetics of particulate organic matter: a new approachWat. Sci. Technol.36239246Google Scholar
  46. Vavilin, VA, Rytov, SV, Lokshina, LYa 1996A description of the hydrolysis kinetics in anaerobic degradation of particulate organic matterBiores. Technol.56229237Google Scholar
  47. Veeken, A, Hamelers, B 1999Effect of temperature on the hydrolysis rate of selected biowaste components, BioresTechnol.69249255Google Scholar
  48. Verger, R 1980Enzyme kinetics in lipolysis, MethEnzymol.64340392Google Scholar
  49. Zeeman, G 1991Mesophilic and physchrophilic digestion of liquid manurePh.D. ThesisWageningen UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environment & Recourses DTUTechnical University of DenmarkBuilding 115LyngbyDenmark
  2. 2.Subdepartment of Environmental TechnologyWageningen Agricultural UniversityWageningen

Personalised recommendations