Advertisement

Distance, transportation and the underpricing of IPOs

  • Zhangkai HuangEmail author
  • Jinyu Liu
  • Guangrong Ma
Original Research
  • 118 Downloads

Abstract

This paper examines the influence of the firm’s location on IPO underpricing using data from the Chinese stock market. We find that geographical proximity to major metropolitan areas reduces the magnitude of IPO underpricing: the distance between the firm and the major metropolitan areas is positively related to the market-adjusted first-day return of the IPO firm. Information opacity further magnifies the geographical effects. Furthermore, we find that China’s recent development of the national bullet train system mitigates the influence of geographical location on IPO underpricing. We apply an instrumental variable approach and a placebo test to address robustness issues.

Keywords

Distance Information costs Bullet train IPO underpricing 

JEL Classification

G10 G30 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study is funded by Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program No. 2017THZWYY10 and National Natural Science Foundation No. 71773125.

References

  1. Agarwal S, Hauswald R (2010) Distance and private information in lending. Rev Financ Stud 23:2757–2788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen F, Faulhaber GR (1989) Signaling by underpricing in the IPO market. J Financ Econ 23:303–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arena MP, Dewally M (2012) Firm location and corporate debt. J Bank Finance 36:1079–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bae KH, Stulz RM, Tan H (2008) Do local analysts know more? A cross-country study of the performance of local analysts and foreign analysts. J Financ Econ 88:581–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benveniste LM, Spindt PA (1989) How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues. J Financ Econ 24:343–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan K, Wang J, Wei KC (2004) Underpricing and long-term performance of IPOs in China. J Corp Finance 10:409–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coval JD, Moskowitz TJ (2001a) Home bias at home: local equity preference in domestic portfolios. J Finance 54:2045–2073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coval JD, Moskowitz TJ (2001b) The geography of investment: informed trading and asset prices. J Polit Econ 109:811–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Degryse H, Ongena S (2005) Distance, lending relationships, and competition. J Finance 60:231–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Firth M, Li Y, Wang S (2008) Valuing IPOs using price-earnings multiples disclosed by IPO firms in an emerging capital market. Rev Pac Basin Finance Polic 11:429–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garmaise MJ, Moskowitz TJ (2004) Confronting information asymmetries: evidence from real estate markets. Rev Financ Stud 17:405–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hau H (2001) Location matters: an examination of trading profits. J Finance 56:1959–1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang Z, Xu X (2009) Marketability, control, and the pricing of block shares. J Bank Finance 33:88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang Z, Li L, Ma G, Xu L (2017) Hayek, local information, and commanding heights: decentralizing state-owned enterprises in China. Am Econ Rev 107:2455–2478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ivković Z, Weisbenner S (2005) Local does as local is: information content of the geography of individual investors’ common stock investments. J Finance 60:267–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. John KJ, Knyazeva A, Knyazeva D (2011) Does geography matter? Firm location and corporate payout policy. J Financ Econ 101:533–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kalnins A, Lafontaine F (2013) Too far away? The effect of distance to headquarters on business establishment performance. Am Econ J Microecon 5:157–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kang J, Kim J (2008) The geography of block acquisitions. J Finance 63:2817–2858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kedia S, Panchapagesan V, Uysal V (2008) Geography and acquirer returns. J Financ Intermed 17:256–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lerner J (1995) Venture capitalists and the oversight of private firms. J Finance 50:301–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu X, Ritter J (2011) Local underwriter oligopolies and IPO underpricing. J Financ Econ 102:579–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ljungqvist A (2007) IPO underpricing. In: Eckbo BE (ed) Handbook of corporate finance. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  23. Loughran T (2008) The impact of firm location on equity issuance. Financ Manag 37:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loughran T, Ritter J (2002) Why don’t issuers get upset about leaving money on the table in IPOs? Rev Financ Stud 15(2):413–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loughran T, Ritter J (2004) Why has IPO underpricing changed over time? Financ Manag 33:5–37Google Scholar
  26. Loughran T, Schultz P (2005) Liquidity: urban versus rural firms. J Financ Econ 78:341–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malloy CJ (2005) The geography of equity analysis. J Finance 60:719–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mian A (2006) Distance constraints: the limits of foreign lending in poor economies. J Finance 61:1465–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petersen MA, Rajan RG (1995) The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. Q J Econ 110:407–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Petersen MA, Rajan RG (2002) Does distance still matter? The information revolution in small business lending. J Finance 57:2533–2570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ritter JR (2005) Investment banking and security issuance, Handbook of the economics of finance. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  32. Ritter JR, Welch I (2002) A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. J Finance 57:1795–1828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rock K (1986) Why new issues are underpriced. J Financ Econ 15:187–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tian L, Han L (2018) How local is local? Evidence from bank competition and corporate innovation in U.S. Rev Quant Finance Acc 50:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Welch I (1989) Seasoned offerings, imitation costs, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. J Finance 44:421–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhou Z, Zhou J (2010) Chinese IPO activity, pricing, and market cycles. Rev Quant Finance Acc 34:483–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of International Business and EconomicsBeijingChina
  3. 3.The School of FinanceRenmin UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations