Asymmetric stock price and liquidity responses to changes in the FTSE SmallCap index
- 377 Downloads
We examine market reactions to changes in the FTSE SmallCap index membership, which are determined quarterly based on market capitalization and are free of information effects. Our main results are asymmetric price and liquidity responses between the firms that are shifted between FTSE indexes and the firms that are new to FTSE indexes. Firms promoted from a smaller-cap to a larger-cap FTSE index experience a permanent increase in stock price accompanied by improvements in liquidity. Similarly, firms demoted from a larger-cap to a smaller-cap FTSE index experience a permanent decrease in stock price accompanied by declines in liquidity. In contrast, firms added to the FTSE SmallCap index that were not previously in FTSE indexes show a transitory price gain and declines in liquidity. The results support the liquidity and price pressure hypotheses.
KeywordsEvent study FTSE SmallCap index Index changes Institutional ownership Liquidity Stock prices Trading volume
JEL ClassificationG12 G14
The authors thank Cheng-Few Lee (Editor-in-Chief) and two anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions. We also appreciate helpful comments from Anna Agapova, Don Cyr, Fayez Elayan, Robert Welch, and seminar participants at Brock University, the 2010 Financial Management Association European conference, and the 2010 Multinational Finance Society conference. Financial support from the Brock Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Institutional Grant is gratefully acknowledged.
- Docking DS, Dowen RJ (2006) Evidence on stock price effects associated with changes in the S&P 600 SmallCap index. Quart J Bus Econ 45:89–114Google Scholar
- Harris L, Gurel E (1986) Price and volume effects associated with changes in the S&P 500 list: new evidence for the existence of price pressures. J Financ 41:815–829Google Scholar
- Singal V (2004) Beyond the random walk: a guide to stock market anomalies and low-risk investing. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar