Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 535–547 | Cite as

A fractional cointegration approach to testing the Ohlson accounting based valuation model

Original Research


We examine the long-run relationship between market value, book value, and residual income in the Ohlson (Contemp Acc Res 11(2):661–687, 1995) model. In particular, we test if market value is cointegrated with book value and residual income in light of their non-stationary behaviors. We find that cointegration applies to only 51 % of the sample firms, casting doubt that book value and residual income alone are adequate in tracking variations in market value, yet we find that market value is fractional cointegrated with book value and residual income for 89 % of the sample firms. This implies that the long-run relationship follows a slow but mean-reverting process. Our results therefore support the Ohlson model.


Accounting based valuation The Ohlson model Value relevance Residual income Book value 

JEL Classification

G17 M40 


  1. Ahmed AS, Morton RM, Schaefer TF (2000) Accounting conservatism and the valuation of accounting numbers: evidence on the Felthem-Ohlson (1996) Model. J Acc Auditing Finance 15(3):271–292Google Scholar
  2. Barth ME, Beaver WH, Hand JRM, Landsman WR (1999) Accruals, cash flows, and equity values. Rev Acc Stud 4(3):205–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkoulas J, Baum CF, Travlos N (2000) Long memory in the Greek stock market. Appl Finan Econ 10:177–184Google Scholar
  4. Beaver WH (1999) Comments on an empirical assessment of the residual income valuation model. J Acc Econ 26(1):35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernard VL (1995) The Feltham-Ohlson framework: implications for empiricists. Contemp Acc Res 11(2):733–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown L, Caylor M (2006) Corporate governance and firm valuation. J Acc Public Policy 25(4):409–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Callen JL, Morel M (2001) Linear accounting valuation when abnormal earnings are AR(2). Rev Quant Finance Acc 16(3):191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Callen JL, Morel M (2005) The valuation relevance of R&D expenditures: time series evidence. Int Rev Financial Anal 14(3):304–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dechow PM, Hutton AP, Sloan RG (1999) An empirical assessment of the residual income valuation Model. J Acc Econ 26(1):1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diebold FX, Rudebusch GD (1991) On the power of Dickey-Fuller tests against fractional alternatives. Econ Lett 35(2):155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fama E, French K (1997) Industry costs of equity. J Financ Econ 43(2):153–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frankel R, Lee CMC (1998) Accounting valuation market expectation and cross-sectional stock returns. J Acc Econ 25(3):283–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gopalakrishnan V (1994) The effect of recognition vs. disclosure on investor valuation: the case of pension accounting. Rev Quant Financ Acc 4:383–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Granger CWJ (1986) Developments in the study of cointegrated economic variables. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 48(3):213–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Granger CWJ, Newbold P (1974) Spurious regressions in econometrics. J Econ 2(2):111–120Google Scholar
  17. Hand JR, Landsman WR (1998) Testing the Ohlson model: V or not V, that is the question. Working Paper, University of North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  18. Hosking JRM (1981) Fractional differencing. Biometrika 68(1):165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hurvich CM, Deo RS, Brodsky J (1998) The mean squared error of Geweke and Porter-Hudak’s estimator of the memory parameter of a long-memory time series. J Time Ser Anal 19(1):19–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang J, Lee BS (2005) An empirical test of the accounting-based residual income model and the traditional present value of dividend model. J Bus 78(4):1465–1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johansen S (1988) Statistics analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12(2):231–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee CMC, Myers JN, Swaminathan B (1999) What is the intrinsic value of the Dow. J Finance 54(5):1693–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu C, Yao LJ, Yao MYM (2012) Value relevance change under international accounting standards: an Empirical Study of Peru. Rev Pac Basin Financial Mark Policies 15(2):1–17Google Scholar
  24. Mackinnon JG (2010) Critical values for cointegration tests. Working paper 1227, Department of Economics, Queen’s UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. McCrae M, Nitsson H (2001) The explanatory and predictive power of different specifications of the Ohlson (1995) valuation models. Eur Acc Rev 10(2):315–334Google Scholar
  26. Morel M (2003) Endogenous parameter time series estimation of the Ohlson model: linear and nonlinear analysis. J Bus Finance Acc 30(9):1341–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Myers JN (1999) Implementing residual income valuation with linear information dynamics. Acc Rev 74(1):1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ohlson JA (1995) Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemp Acc Res 11(2):661–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ota K (2002) A test of the Ohison (1995) model: empirical evidence from Japan. Int J Acc 37(2):157–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Penman SH (2001) On comparing cash flow and accrual accounting models for use in equity valuation: a response to Lundholm and O’Keefe. Contemp Acc Res 18(4):681–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Penman SH (2005) Discussion of ‘on accounting-based valuation formulae’ and ‘expected EPS and EPS growth as determinants of value’. Rev Acc Stud 10(2):367–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Penman SH, Sougiannis T (1998) A comparison of dividend, cash flow, and earnings approaches to equity valuation. Contemp Acc Res 15(3):343–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Phillips PCB (1987) Time series regression with a unit root. Econometrica 55(2):277–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Qi D, Wu YW, Xiang B (2000) Stationarity and cointegration tests of the Ohlson model. J Acc Auditing Finance 15(2):141–160Google Scholar
  35. Robinson PM (1995) Gaussian semiparametric estimation of long range dependence. Ann Stat 23(5):1630–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robinson P, Henry M (1999) Long and short memory conditional heteroscedasticity in estiamting the memory parameter of levels. Econ Theo 15:299–336Google Scholar
  37. Tsay RS, Lin YM, Wang HW (2008) Residual Income, value-relevant information and equity valuation: a simultaneous equations approach. Rev Quant Financ Acc 31:331–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang L, Alam P, Makar S (2005) The value-relevance of derivative disclosures by commercial banks: a Comprehensive Study of Information Content Under SFAS Nos. 119 and 133. Rev Quant Financ Acc 25:413–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wong WK, Chan RH (2004) On the estimation of cost of capital and its reliability. Quant Finance 4(3):365–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Finance, College of ManagementYuan Ze UniversityChung-LiTaiwan
  2. 2.School of Accounting, Economics, and FinanceDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia
  3. 3.Graduate Institute of FinanceNational Chiao Tung UniversityHsinchuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations