Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 69–92 | Cite as

Firm diversification and earnings management: evidence from seasoned equity offerings

  • Chee Yeow Lim
  • Tiong Yang Thong
  • David K. Ding
Original Paper

Abstract

Popular press suggests that diversified firms are more aggressive in managing earnings than non-diversified firms. We examine this claim in the seasoned equity offering (SEO) setting, where firms have been shown to have the incentive to manage earnings upwards. Using the cross-sectional modified Jones [(1991) J Accounting Res 29:193–228] model to measure discretionary current accruals, we find that discretionary current accruals are higher among diversified firms than in non-diversified ones. Our evidence is consistent with the view that the extent of firm diversification is directly related to the degree of earnings management. We further show that diversified issuers with high discretionary accruals underperformed other SEO firms.

Keywords

Seasoned equity offerings Corporate diversification Earnings management Accruals Stock market performance 

JEL Classifications

G32 G34 M41 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful suggestions and comments on previous versions of the paper by Jay Ritter, Hun-Tong Tan, Huai Zhang, Divesh Shankar Sharma, and seminar participants at the Nanyang Business School’s Faculty Workshop.

References

  1. Bartov E, Gul F, Tsui J (2001) Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications. J Account Econ 30:421–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker C, DeFond M, Jiambalvo J Subramanyam K (1998) The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemp Account Res 15:1–24Google Scholar
  3. Berger P, Hann R (2003) The Impact of SFAS No. 131 on information and monitoring. J Account Res 41:163–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger P, Ofek E (1995) Diversification’s effect on firm value. J Financ Econ 37:39–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgstahler D, Dichev I (1997) Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. J Account Econ 24:99–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bushee B (1998) The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Account Rev 73:305–333Google Scholar
  7. Chandler A (1977) The visible hand. Cambridge: Belknap PressGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen H, Guo R (2005) On corporate divestiture. Rev Quantitat Finance Account 24:399–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen C, Steiner T (2000) An agency analysis of firm diversification: the consequences of discretionary cash and managerial risk considerations. Rev Quantitat Finance Account 14:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Comment R, Jarell G (1995) Corporate focus and stock returns. J Financ Econ 37:67–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dechow P, Sloan R, Sweeney A (1995) Detecting earnings management. Account Rev 70:193–225Google Scholar
  12. Dechow P, Sloan R, Sweeney A (1996) Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms’ subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemp Account Res 13:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeFond M, Park C (2001) The reversal of abnormal accruals and the market valuation of earnings surprises. Account Rev 76:375–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denis D, Denis D, Sarin A (1997) Agency problems, equity ownership and corporate diversification. J Finance 56:2299–2335Google Scholar
  15. Dye R (1988) Earnings management in an overlapping generations model. J Account Res 26:325–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ernst & Young LLP (1998) Disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information: FASB statement 131Google Scholar
  17. Financial Accounting Standards Board (2002) Proposal: principles-based approach to US standard setting. File Reference No. 1125–001. Norwalk, CT: FASBGoogle Scholar
  18. Fishman M, Hagerty K (1990) The optimal amount of discretion to allow in disclosure. Quart J Econ 195:427–444Google Scholar
  19. Gertner R H, Scharfstein D S, Stein J C (1994) Internal versus external capital markets. Quart J Econ 109:1211–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilson S, Healy P, Noe C, Palepu K (2001) Analyst specialization and conglomerate stock breakups. J Account Res 39:565–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graves S (1988) Institutional ownership and corporate R&D in the computer industry. Acad Manage J 31:417–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Habib M, Johnsen D, Naik N (1997) Spinoffs and information. J Financ Intermed 6:153–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hadlock C, Ryngaert M, Thomas S (2001) Corporate structure and equity offerings: are there benefits to diversification? J Bus 74:613–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herrmann D, Thomas W (2000) An analysis of segment disclosures under SFAS No. 131 and SFAS No. 14. Account Horizons 14:287–302Google Scholar
  25. Hribar P, Collins D (2002) Errors in estimating accruals: implications for empirical research. J Account Res 40:105–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones J (1991) Earnings management during import relief investigations. J Account Res 29:193–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kasznik R (1999) On the association between voluntary disclosure and earnings management. J Account Res 37:57–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kothari S, Leone A, Wasley C (2005) Performance matched discretionary accruals. J Account Econ 39:163–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krishnaswami S, Subramanian V (1999) Information asymmetry, valuation, and the corporate spin-off decision. J Financ Econ 53:73–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lamont O (1997) Cash flow and investment: evidence from internal capital markets. J Finance 52:83–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leland H (1998) Agency costs, risk management, and capital structure. J Finance 53:1212–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewellen W (1971) A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger. J Finance 26:521–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Loughran T, Ritter J (1995) The new issue puzzle. J Finance 50:23–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loughran T, Ritter J (1997) The operating performance of firms conducting seasoned equity offerings. J Finance 52:1823–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loughran T, Ritter J (2000) Uniformly least powerful tests of market efficiency. J Financ Econ 55:361–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lyon J D, Barber B M, Tsai C (1999) Improved methods for tests of long-run abnormal stock returns. J Finance 54:165–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matsusaka J G, Nanda V (2002) Internal capital markets and corporate refocusing. J Financ Intermed 11:176–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McNichols M (2000) Research designs issues in earnings management studies. J Account Publ Policy 19:313–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Munter P (1999) SEC sharply criticizes “earnings management” accounting. J Corp Account Finance 31–38Google Scholar
  40. Nanda V, Narayanan M (1999) Disentangling value: financial needs, firm scope, and divestitures. J Financ Intermed 8:174–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rajan R, Servaes H, Ziangales L (2000) The cost of diversity: the diversification discount and inefficient investment. J Finance 55:35–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rajgopal S, Venkatachalam M, Jiambalvo J (1999) Is institutional ownership associated with earnings management and the extent to which stock prices reflect future earnings? Working Paper, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  43. Rangan S (1998) Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings. J Financ Econ 50:101–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richardson V (2000) Information asymmetry and earnings management: some evidence. Rev Quantitat Finance Account 15:325–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruland W, Zhou P (2005) Debt, diversification, and valuation. Rev Quantitat Finance Account 25:277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shin H, Stulz R (1998) Are internal capital markets efficient? Quart J Econ 113:531–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shivakumar L (2000) Do firms mislead investors by overstating before seasoned equity offerings. J Account Econ 29:339–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Siddiqi M, Warganegara D (2003) Using spinoffs to reduce capital mis-allocations. Rev Quantitat Finance Account 20:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Skinner D (1993) The investment opportunity set and accounting procedure choice: preliminary evidence. J Account Econ 16:407–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith C, Stulz R (1985) The determinants of firms hedging policies. J Financ Econ 22:249–281Google Scholar
  51. Spiess L, Affleck-Graves J (1995) Underperformance in long-run stock returns following seasoned equity offerings. J Financ Econ 38:243–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stein J (1997) Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources. J Finance 52:111–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Street D, Nichols N, Gray S (2000) Segment disclosures under SFAS No. 131: has business segment reporting improved? Account Horizons 14:259–285Google Scholar
  54. Stulz R (1990) Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. J Financ Econ 26: 3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Subramanyam K (1996) The pricing of abnormal accruals. J Account Econ 22:249–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Teoh S, Welch I, Wong T J (1998) Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings. J Financ Econ 50:63–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Trueman B, Titman S (1988) An explanation for accounting income smoothing. J Account Res 26:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Warfield T, Wild J, Wild K (1995) Managerial ownership, accounting choices and informativeness of earnings. J Account Econ 20:61–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Watts R, Zimmerman J (1986) Positive accounting theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chee Yeow Lim
    • 1
  • Tiong Yang Thong
    • 2
  • David K. Ding
    • 3
  1. 1.Nanyang Business SchoolNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.School of BusinessSIM UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Department of Finance, Lee Kong Chian School of BusinessSingapore Management UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations