The effect of differential accounting conservatism on the “over-valuation” of high-tech firms relative to low-tech firms


This paper examines systematic differences in the level of accounting conservatism between high-tech and low-tech firms. Relying on the recent development in theoretical models and empirical measures of conservatism, we investigate conservative accounting practices and earnings management behavior in high-tech and low-tech firms. The results based on comparisons of cumulative nonoperating accruals, regression coefficients from the income timeliness models in Basu (1997), the distribution of earnings, and discretionary accruals between the two groups are consistent with a higher level of accounting conservatism in high-tech firms vis-à-vis low-tech firms. Additional analyses show that the effect of conservatism cannot be used as a defense for the over-valuation of high-tech firms.


High-tech Low-tech Conservatism Earnings management 


  1. Amir E, Lev B (1996) Value-relevance of non-financial information: the wireless communications industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22:3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball R, Kothari SP, Robin A (2000) The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29:1–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barth M, Elliott J, Finn M (1999) Market rewards associated with patterns of increasing earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 37:387–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartov E, Gul FA, Tsui JSJ (2001) Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30:421–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu S (1997) The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24:3–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beaver WH, (1993) Conservatism. Working paper, Stanford University, presented at the American Accounting Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  7. Beaver W, Ryan S (2000) Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-to-market ratio to predict book return on equity. Journal of Accounting Research 127–148Google Scholar
  8. Beaver W, Lambert R, Morse D (1980) The information content of security prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2:3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell J, Shiller R (1998) Valuation ratios and the long-run stock market outlook. Journal of Portfolio Management 24:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole K, Helwege J, Laster D (1996) Stock market valuation indictors: Is this time different? Financial Analysts Journal 52:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dechow P, Sloan R, Sweeney A (1996) Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Journal of Accounting and Economics 13:1–36Google Scholar
  12. Dechow P, Sloan R, Sweeney A (1995) Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70:193–225Google Scholar
  13. DeFond ML, Jiambalvo J (1994) Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17:145–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Devine C (1993) The Rule of conservatism reexamined. Journal of Accounting Research 1:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dreman D (1998) It’s tulip time on wall street. Forbes 161:325Google Scholar
  16. Francis J, Philbrick D, Schipper K (1994) Shareholder litigation and corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 32:137–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Francis J, Schipper K (1999) Have financial statements lost their relevance? Journal of Accounting Research 37:319–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Francis J, Maydew E, Sparks H (1999) The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18:17–34Google Scholar
  19. French K, Poterba JM (1991) Were japanese stock prices too high? Journal of Financial Economics 37:319–352Google Scholar
  20. Givoly D, Hayn C (2000) The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics 29:287–320Google Scholar
  21. Gray SJ (1980) The impact of international accounting differences from a security-analysis perspective. Journal of Accounting Research 18, 64–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenberg H (2003) Expecting tech’s comeback? Fortune, 116Google Scholar
  23. Grundfest J, Perino M (1997) Ten things we know and ten things we don’t know about the private securities litigation reform act of 1995. Joint Written Testimony to the U.S. Congress, July 24, 1997, available at
  24. Guay WR, Kothari SP, Watts RL (1996) A market-based evaluation of discretionary accrual models. Journal of Accounting Research 34:83–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gul FA, Tsui JSL (1998) A test of free cash flow and debt monitoring hypothesis: Evidence from audit sampling. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24:219–237Google Scholar
  26. Harris T, Lang M, Moller H (1994) The value relevance of german accounting measures: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting Research 32:187–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Healy P, Palepu K (1993) ‘The effect of firms’ financial disclosure policies on stock prices. Accounting Horizons 7:1–11Google Scholar
  28. Holthausen RW, Watts RL (2001) The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31:3–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson M, Kasznik R, Nelson K (2001) The impact of securities litigation reform on the disclosure of forward-looking information by high technology firms. Journal of Accounting Research 39:297–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones C, Weingram S (1996) The Determinants of 10b-5 Litigation Risk Working paper, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones J (1991) Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29:193–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Joos P, Lang M (1994) The effects of accounting diversity: Evidence from the European union. Journal of Accounting Research 32:141–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kasznik R, Lev B (1995) To warn or not to warn. The Accounting Review 10:113–134Google Scholar
  34. Krishnan J, Krishnan J (1997) Litigation risk and auditor resignations. The Accounting Review 72:539–560Google Scholar
  35. Kwon SS (2002a) Financial analysts’ forecast accuracy and dispersion: High-tech versus low-tech stocks. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 19:65–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kwon SS (2002b) The effect of conservative accounting on value relevance of earnings and sales: High-tech versus low-tech firms. Working Paper, Rutgers UniversityGoogle Scholar
  37. Kwon SS, Yin J (2006) Executive compensation, investment opportunities and earnings management: High-tech versus low-tech firms. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 21:119–148Google Scholar
  38. Lev B, Sougiannis T (1996) The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21:107–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McNichols M (1998) A comparison of the skewness of stock return distributions at earnings announcement date. Journal of Accounting and Economics 10:239–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Myers S (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5:147–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pope P, Walker M (1999) International differences in timeliness, conservatism and classification of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 37:53–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shevlin T (1996) The value-relevance of nonfinancial information: A discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skinner D (1994) Why firms voluntarily disclose bad news. Journal of Accounting Research 32:38–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skinner D (1997) Earnings disclosure and stockholder lawsuits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 23:249–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Skinner D, Sloan R (2002) Earnings surprises, growth expectations, and stock returns or don’t let an earnings torpedo sink your portfolio. Review of Accounting Studies 7:289–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith G (2002) Technology. Business Week 114–115Google Scholar
  47. Smith CW, Watts RL (1992) The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics 32:263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Speidel S, Bavishi V (1992) GAAP arbitrage: Valuation opportunities in international accounting standards. Financial Analysts Journal 48:58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stickney CP, Weil RL (2000) Financial accounting: An introduction to concepts, methods, and uses, 9th Edition. The Dryden PressGoogle Scholar
  50. Subramanyam KR (1996) The pricing of discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22:249–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trueman B, Wong F, Zhang X (2000) The eyeballs have it: Searching for the value in internet stocks. Journal of Accounting Research 38:137–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watts R (2003) Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons 17:207–221Google Scholar
  53. Watts R (1993) A proposal for research on conservatism. Working paper, University of Rochester, presented at American Accounting Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  54. Watts R, Zimmerman J (1978) Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 54:112–134Google Scholar
  55. White B (2000) What P/E will the U.S. stock market support?. Financial Analysts Journal 56:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. White H (1980) Heteroskedasticity consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test of heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48:817–838Google Scholar
  57. Wolk HI, Francis JR, Tearny MG (1992) Accounting theory: A conceptual and institutional approach, PWS-KENT Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  58. Wyatt J (1996) The incredible, death-defying stock market: Love it and fear it. Fortune 143:110–118Google Scholar
  59. Zhang X (2000) Conservative accounting and equity valuation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29:125-149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Administrative StudiesYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of AccountingUniversity of Texas at San AntonioSan Antonio
  3. 3.School of BusinessRutgers University–CamdenCamden

Personalised recommendations