Advertisement

Pascal, Pascalberg, and friends

  • Samuel LebensEmail author
Article

Abstract

Pascal’s wager has to face the many gods objection. The wager goes wrong when it asks us to chose between Christianity and atheism, as if there are no other options. Some have argued that we’re entitled to dismiss exotic, bizarre, or subjectively unappealing religions from the scope of the wager. But they have provided no satisfying justification for such a radical wager-saving dispensation. This paper fills that dialectical gap. It argues that some agents are blameless or even praiseworthy for ignoring all but one religion as they face the wager. The argument leads us to multiple Pascals: a Jewish one, a Christian one, a Muslim one, and more.

Keywords

Pascal Rationality Thinkability Social epistemology 

Notes

References

  1. Bahrdt, K. F. (1784–92). Ausführung des Plans und Zwecks Jesu in Briefen an wahrheitssuchende Leser. Berlin: August Mylius.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition,4, 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cargile, J. (1966). Pascal’s wager. Philosophy,41, 250–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, A. (2000). On Pascal’s wager, or why all bets are off. Philosophical Quarterly,50, 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalton, P. (1975). Pascal’s wager: The second argument. Southern Journal of Philosophy,13, 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Cruz, H. (forthcoming). Seeking out epistemic friction in the philosophy of religion. In M. Panchuk. & M. Rea. (Eds.), Marginal identities, peripheral theologies: Expanding conversations in analytic theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dein, S. (2001). What really happens when prophecy fails: The case of Lubavitch. Sociology of Religion,62(3), 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diderot, D. (2018). Philosophical thoughts: And other texts. Independently Published.Google Scholar
  9. Dunkel, T. M., Davidson, D., & Qurashi, S. (2010). Body satisfaction and pressure to be thin in younger and older Muslim and non-Muslim women: The role of Western and non-Western dress preferences. Body Image,7(1), 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fackenheim, E. L. (1994). To mend the world: Foundations of post-Holocaust Jewish thought. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fantl, J., & McGrath, M. (2002). Evidence, pragmatics and justification. Philosophical Review,111(1), 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flew, A. (1976). Is Pascal’s wager the only safe bet?. In: The presumption of atheism (pp. 61–68). New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Frankfurt, H. (1988). The importance of what we care about. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frankfurt, H. (1998). Necessity, volition, and love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gale, R. (1991). On the nature and existence of god. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hájek, A. (2003). Waging war on Pascal’s wager. Philosophical Review,112(1), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hájek, A. (2015). Pascal’s ultimate gamble. In A. Byrne, J. Cohen, G. Rosen, & S. Shiffrin (Eds.), The Norton introduction to philosophy. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  18. Hazlett, A. (2016). Intellectual loyalty. International Journal for the Study of Skepticism,6(2–3), 326–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howard-Snyder, D. (2013). Propositional faith: What it is and what it is not. Americal Philosophical Quarterly,50(4), 357–372.Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, E., & Rogers, A. (2019). Salvaging Pascal’s Wager. Philosophia Christi, 21(1), 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. James, W. (1956). The will to believe and other essays. Mineola, NY.: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Jordan, J. (1998). Pascal’s Wager revisited. Religious Studies,34, 419–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jordan, J. (2006). Pascal’s wager: Pragmatic arguments and belief in god. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keller, S. (2004). Friendship and belief. Philosophical Papers,33(3), 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kellner, M. (2006). Must a jew believe anything (2nd ed.). Oxford: Littman Library Of Jewish Civilization.Google Scholar
  26. Koenig, H., King, D., & Carson, V. B. (2012). Handbook of religion and health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Krueger, A. B., et al. (2009). National time accounting: The currency of life. In A. Krueger (Ed.), Measuring the subjective well-being of nations: national accounts of time use and well-being (pp. 9–86). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lebens, S., & Goldschmidt, T. (2017). The promise of a new past. Philosophers’ Imprint,17(18), 1–25.Google Scholar
  30. Lim, C. (2012). In U.S., Churchgoers Boast Better Mood, Especially on Sundays. Gallup, 22 March.Google Scholar
  31. Lim, C., & Putnam, R. D. (2012). Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. American Sociological Review,75(6), 915.Google Scholar
  32. Mackie, J. L. (1982). The miracle of theism: Arguments for and against the existence of god. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Martin, M. (1975). On four critiques of Pascal’s wager. Sophia,14, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T., & Larson, D. (2001). Small, robust, and important: Reply to Sloan and Bagiella. Health Psychology,20(3), 228–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCullough, E., et al. (2000). Religious involvement and mortality: A meta-analytic review. Health Psychology,19(3), 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mirvis, E. (2018). The wellbeing of LGBT + pupils: A guide for orthodox jewish schools. London: Office of the Chief Rabbi.Google Scholar
  37. Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1993). Seeing virtues in faults: Negativity and the transformation of interpersonal narratives in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,65, 707–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,23, 586–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Newport, F., Agrawal, S., & Witters, D. (2010). Very religious Americans report less depression, Worry. Gallup, 1 December.Google Scholar
  40. Newport, F., Witters, D., & Agrawal, S. (2012). Religious Americans enjoy higher wellbeing. Gallup, 16 Febuary.Google Scholar
  41. Oppy, G. (1900). On rescher on Pascal’s wager. Philosophy of Religion,30, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oppy, G. (2018). Infinity in Pascal’s wager. In P. Bartha & L. Pasternack (Eds.), Pascal’s wager (pp. 260–277). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Owens, A. P., et al. (2018). Tefillin use induces remote ischemic preconditioning pathways in healthy males. American Journal of Physiology Heart and Circulatory Physiology,315, H1748–H1758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pascal, B. (1995). Pensees and other writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rota, M. (2016). Taking Pascal’s wager: Faith, evidence, and the abundant life. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.Google Scholar
  47. Saka, P. (2001). Pascal’s wager and the many gods objection. Religious Studies,37, 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saka, P. (2018). Rationality and the wager. In P. Bartha & L. Pasternack (Eds.), Pascal’s wager (pp. 187–208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the limits of justice (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Stanley, J., & Hawthorne, J. (2008). Knowledge and action. The Journal of Philosophy,105(10), 571–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stark, R., & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  52. Stroud, S. (2006). Epistemic partiality in friendship. Ethics,116(3), 498–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Svenson, O., & Benthorn, L. J. (1992). Consolidation processes in decision making: Post-decision changes in attractiveness of alternatives. Journal of Economic Psychology,13, 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Swinburne, R. (2003). The resurrection of god incarnate. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Swinburne, R. (2004). The existence of god (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams, B. (1973). A critique of utilitarianism. In J. J. C. Smart & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism: for and against (pp. 77–135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Williams, B. (1995). Moral incapacity. In Making sense of humanity and other philosophical papers (pp. 45–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations