Divine premotion

Article

Abstract

According to divine premotionism, God does not merely create and sustain the universe. He also moves all secondary causes to action as instruments without undermining their intrinsic causal efficacy. I explain and uphold the premotionist theory, which is the theory of St Thomas Aquinas and his most prominent exponents. I defend the premotionist interpretation of Aquinas in some textual detail, with particular reference to Suarez and to a recent paper by Louis Mancha. Critics, including Molinists and Suarezians, raise various objections to the view that premotion is compatible with genuine secondary causation. I rebut a number of these objections, in the course of which I respond to the central challenge that premotionism destroys free will. I also offer a number of positive reasons for embracing the premotionist theory.

Keywords

Premotion Aquinas Free Will Concurrentism Occasionalism Instrumental causation 

References

  1. Aquinas, St T. (c.1259). Quaestiones Disputatae de Veritate. Retrieved November 18, 2014, from http://www.dhspriory.org/thomas/QDdeVer.htm
  2. Aquinas, St. T. (c.1264/1956). Summa Contra Gentiles, Book 3. In On the Truth of the Catholic Faith, Summa Contra Gentiles, Book Three: Providence, Part I (V. J. Bourke, Trans.). Garden City, NY: Image Books/Doubleday & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Aquinas, St. T. (c.1268). Quaestiones Disputatae de Potentia Dei. Retrieved November 4, 2014, from http://dhspriory.org/thomas/QDdePotentia.htm
  4. Aquinas, St. T. (c.1273a/1920). The ‘Summa Theologica’ of St Thomas Aquinas (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans., Vol. 1). London: Burns Oates & Washbourne Ltd.Google Scholar
  5. Aquinas, St. T. (c.1273b/1922). The ‘Summa Theologica’ of St Thomas Aquinas (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans., Vol. 5). London: Burns Oates & Washbourne Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, B. (2012). The Oxford handbook of Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fakhry, M. (1958). Islamic occasionalism and its critique by Averroes and Aquinas. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Freddoso, A. J. (1991). God’s general concurrence with secondary causes: why conservation is not enough. In J. E. Tomberlin (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives (Vol. 5, pp. 553–585). Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Garrigou-Lagrange, R. (1936). Prémotion Physique. In A. Vacant, E. Mangenot, & É. Amann (Eds.), Dictionnaire de Théologie Catholique. Paris: Librairie Letouzey et Ané.Google Scholar
  10. Garrigou-Lagrange, R. (1939). Predestination. St. Louis: B. Herder Book Co.Google Scholar
  11. Jerome, St. (c.415). Dialogue against the Pelagians. Retrieved October 24, 2014, from, http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf206.vi.ix.I_1.html
  12. Malebranche, N. (1678/1997). The Search after Truth and Elucidations of the Search after Truth (T. M. Lennon & P. J. Olscamp, Ed., Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Mancha, L. (2012). Aquinas Suarez, and Malebranche on instrumental causation and premotion. International Philosophical Quarterly, 52, 335–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McHugh, J. A. & Callan, C. J. (1982). The Catechism of the Council of Trent. Rockford, IL: Tan Books and Publishers, Inc.; reprint of 1923 editionGoogle Scholar
  15. Molina, L. (1588). Concordia Liberi Arbitrii cum Gratiae Donis, Part II, Disp. 25 and 26. Retrieved November 26, 2014, from, http://www3.nd.edu/~afreddos/translat/molina25.htm and http://www3.nd.edu/~afreddos/translat/molina26.htm
  16. Oderberg, D.S. (2015). All for the good. Philosophical Investigations, 38, 72–95.Google Scholar
  17. Ott, L. (1974). Fundamentals of Catholic dogma. Rockford, IL: Tan Books and Publishers, Inc.; reprint of 4th ed., 1960Google Scholar
  18. Phillips, R. P. (1962). Modern Thomistic philosophy (Vol. II). Westminster, MD: The Newman Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pruss, A. R. (2013). Incompatibilism proved. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 43, 430–437.Google Scholar
  20. Rotelle, J. E. (Ed.). (2002). Saint Augustine on Genesis. Hyde Park: New City Press.Google Scholar
  21. Suarez, F. (1597/2002). Disputationes metaphysicae 20–22. In On creation, conservation, and concurrence (A. J. Freddoso, Trans.). South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.Google Scholar
  22. Weisheipl, J. A. (1983). Friar Thomas D’Aquino: His life, thought and works. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wilhelm, J., & Scannell, T. B. (1909). A manual of Catholic theology (Vol. 1). New York: Benziger Bros.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations