Faith, reason, and charity in Thomas Aquinas’s thought

  • Roberto Di Ceglie


Aquinas’s thought is often considered an exemplary balance between Christian faith and natural reason. However, it is not always sufficiently clear what such balance consists of. With respect to the relation between philosophical topics and the Christian faith, various scholars have advanced perspectives that, although supported by Aquinas’s texts, contrast one another. Some maintain that Aquinas elaborated his philosophical view without being under the influence of faith. Others believe that the Christian faith constitutes an indispensable component of Aquinas’s view; at least when Aquinas focused on those statements that, though maintainable by mere reason, belong to the Christian revelation. In this essay I intend to show that the aforementioned perspectives can be reconciled on the basis of Aquinas’s concept of faith. If we do not limit ourselves to considering faith as the assent to the revealed truth, but also look at what leads the believer to assent—i.e., charity that unites the believer with God and is gratuitously conceded by God himself—then the relation between faith and reason appears to be twofold. On the one hand, the truths of faith cannot participate in the rational inquiry, because according to Aquinas faith lacks the evidence searched for by natural reason. On the other hand, since Aquinas holds that faith is the assent to the revelation due to the love for God that is granted by God himself, the believer will take faith as more certain than intellect and science, and the truths of faith will constitute the orientation and criterion of her/his rational investigation. The truths shall constitute orientation because the believer aims to confirm by reason what she/he already believes. They will also be criterion, because in case of a contradiction between rational arguments and revealed truths, reason must be considered mistaken and the rational investigation must start anew from the beginning.


Aquinas Faith and reason Love for God Evidence  Preambles of faith 


  1. Aquinas, T. (1920). Summa Theologica (trans: The Fathers of the English Dominican Province, second and revised edition). London: Oates and Washbourne.Google Scholar
  2. Aquinas, T. (1946). Super Boethium De Trinitate, q. 2, (trans: Brennan, R. E.). NewYork: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
  3. Aquinas, T. (1953). De Veritate, q. 14, (trans: McGlynn, J.V.). Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.Google Scholar
  4. Aquinas, T. (1955–1957). Summa contra Gentiles (trans: Pegis. A., Anderson, J. F., Bourke, V. J., & O’Neil, C. J.). New York: Hanover House, 1955–57.Google Scholar
  5. Aquinas, T. (1970). Expositio libri Posteriorum Analyticorum, I, (trans: Larcher, F.R. Albany, N.Y.). Magi Books.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, B. (Ed.). (2006). Aquinas’s summa theologiae: Critical essays. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  7. de Broglie, G. (1953). La vraie notion thomiste des ‘praeambula fidei’. Gregorianum, 34, 341–389.Google Scholar
  8. Di Ceglie, R. (2014). On Aquinas’s theological reliabilism. The Heythrop Journal. doi: 10.1111/heyj.12243.
  9. Gilson, E. (1957). What is Christian philosophy? In Pegis, A. (Ed.) A Gilson reader. Selected writings of Etienne Gilson (pp.177–191). Garden City, New York: Doubleday and C.Google Scholar
  10. Elders, L. J. (2008). Faith and reason: The synthesis of st. Thomas Aquinas. Divinitas, 51, 243–273.Google Scholar
  11. Jenkins, J. (2007). Faith and revelation. In B. Davies (Ed.), Philosophy of religion. A guide to the subject (pp. 202–227). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Leftow, B. (2006). Aquinas’s philosophical theology. In B. Leftow & B. Davies (Eds.), Aquinas: Questions on God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. vii-xxxi.Google Scholar
  13. McInerny, R. (1998). How I became a Christian philosopher. Faith and Philosophy, 15, 144–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McInerny, R. (2006). Praeambula fidei: Thomism and the God of the philosophers. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  15. Penelhum, T. (1977). The analysis of faith in Thomas Aquinas. Religious Studies, 13, 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Price, H. (1965). Belief “in” and belief “that”. Religious Studies, 1, 5–27.Google Scholar
  18. Riga, P. (1971). The act of faith in Augustine and Aquinas. The Thomist, 35, 143–174.Google Scholar
  19. Stump, E. (1992). Aquinas on the foundations of knowledge. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 17(1992), 125–158.Google Scholar
  20. Vos, A. (1985). Aquinas, Calvin, and contemporary Protestant thought. Washington and Grand Rapids: Christian University Press and Eerdmans Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  21. Wippel, J. (1984). The possibility of a Christian philosophy: A thomistic perspective. Faith and Philosophy, 1, 272–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pontifical Lateran UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations