International Journal for Philosophy of Religion

, Volume 70, Issue 3, pp 203–216 | Cite as

Religion in a private igloo? A critical dialogue with Richard Rorty



It is still a popular philosophical position to call for a strict “separationism” concerning the private and the public sphere when it comes to religious convictions. Richard Rorty is one prominent supporter of this claim. The traditional critique against this division is mostly built on a particular characterization of religion that is at odds with Rortian assumptions. In this article, however, Rorty is criticized on his own terms turning pragmatically the objection to a fully internal one. What Rorty values most, namely a tolerant and ironic liberalism as the capacity to describe oneself in new and interesting ways is precisely the role, I argue, that religious faith could play under “neo-liberal” conditions.


Rorty Irony (Neo)liberalism Privacy Public sphere Metaphysics (Self)understanding 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amesbury R. (2008) Religious neutrality and the secular state: The politics of God’s absence?. In: Dalferth I. U. (eds) The presence and absence of God. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  2. Brümmer, V. (2010). Dawkins’ religion. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, 52, 2.Google Scholar
  3. Casanova J. (1994) Public religions and the modern world. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Conant J. (2000) Freedom, cruelty, and truth: Rorty versus Orwell. In: Brandom R. (eds) Rorty and his critics. Oxford University Press, Oxford/Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalferth I. U. (2010) Post-secular society: Christianity and the dialectics of the secular. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 78(2): 1–29Google Scholar
  6. Elstain J. B. (2003) Don’t be cruel: Reflexions on Rortyan liberalism. In: Guignon C., Hiley D. R. (eds) Richard Rorty (Contemporary Philosophy in Focus). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Gogarten F. (1956) Der Mensch zwischen Gott und Welt. Vorwerk, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  8. Habermas, J. (2005a). Religion in der Öffentlichkeit. Kognitive Voraussetzungen für den ,öffentlichen Vernunftgebrauch’ religiöser und säkularer Bürger. In idem, Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  9. Habermas, J. (2005b). Die Grenze zwischen Glauben und Wissen. Zur Wirkungsgeschichte und aktuellen Bedeutung von Kants Religionsphilosophie. In idem, Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  10. Hegel, G. W. F. (1955). In J. Hoffmeister (Ed.), Die Vernunft in der Geschichte (5th ed.). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  11. Heidegger M. (1959) Unterwegs zur Sprache (14th ed.). Klett-Cotta, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  12. Reece G. L. (2002) Irony and religious belief. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  13. Rorty R. (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (PMN). Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  14. Rorty R. (1989) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (CIS). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Rorty R. (1997) Truth, politics and ’post-modernism’ (TP). Spinoza lectures.. Amsterdam, Van GorcumGoogle Scholar
  16. Rorty R. (1999) Philosophy and Social Hope (SH). Pinguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Rorty, R. (2001). Philosophie & die Zukunft. Essays (PZ) (2nd ed.). Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer (original German edition).Google Scholar
  18. Rorty R. (2003a) Religion in the Public Square: A reconsideration (PS). Journal of Religious Ethics 31(1): 141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rorty, R. (2003b). Der Roman als Mittel zur Erlösung aus der Selbstbezogenheit (R). In J. Küpper & C. Menke (Eds.), Dimensionen ästhetischer Erfahrung (pp. 49–66). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp (original German article).Google Scholar
  20. Rorty R. (2007) Philosophy as Cultural Politics (PC). Philosophical papers IV. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Rorty R., Vattimo G. (2005) The Future of Religion (RV) (S. Zabala, Ed.). Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Rössler, B. (2007). Der Wert des Privaten. Frankfurt a.M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  23. Schapp W. (1953) In Geschichten verstrickt. Zum Sein von Mensch und Ding (4th ed.). Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt a.MGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor C. (2002) Varieties of religion today. William James revisited. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor, C. (2005). Self-interpreting animals [1985]. In Human agency and language. Philosophical papers 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Tillich, P. (1975). Die religiöse Substanz der Kultur. In Schriften zur Theologie der Kultur (Gesammelte Werke, ed. by R. Albrecht, Bd. IX) (2nd ed.). Stuttgart: Kreuz Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Vattimo G. (1999) Belief. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ZurichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations