Advertisement

The Dubious Antitrust Argument for Breaking Up the Internet Giants

  • Robert W. CrandallEmail author
Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Recent calls for using the antitrust laws to break up the large Internet giants are misplaced for a number of reasons. First, similar efforts against oil, tobacco, motion-picture, and telecommunications monopolies have not proved to be beneficial to economic welfare. Second, the failure to break up Microsoft using Section 2 has not proved to be a mistake: competition in operating systems and Internet browsers has flourished recently. Finally, a Section 2 case against Amazon, Facebook, or Google could not succeed if it focused on the digital advertising market. Even in a case based on market power on the other side of their platforms, a structural remedy—a break-up—would not improve economic welfare in the long run.

Keywords

Antitrust Internet Media 

Notes

References

  1. Butts, C. (2010). The Microsoft case 10 years later: Antitrust and new leading “New Economy” firms. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 8(2), 275–291.Google Scholar
  2. Crandall, R. (1990). After the breakup. Washington: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  3. Crandall, R. (2001). The failure of structural remedies in Sherman Act monopolization cases. Oregon Law Review, 80(1), 109–198.Google Scholar
  4. Crandall, R. (2005). Competition and chaos: U.S. Telecommunications since the 1996 Act. Washington: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  5. Easterbrook, F. (1984). The limits of antitrust. Texas Law Review, 63(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
  6. Economides, N. (2001). United States v. Microsoft: A failure of antitrust in the New Economy. UWLA Law Review, 32(3), 3–44.Google Scholar
  7. Gao, X., Ritter, J., & Zhu, Z. (2013). Where have all the IPO’s gone? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(6), 1663–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grullon, G., Larkin, Y., & Michaely, R. (2018). Are US industries becoming more concentrated? Review of Finance (forthcoming). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2612047.
  9. Manne, G., & Wright, J. (2011). Google and the limits of antitrust: The case against the case against Google. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 34(1), 171–244.Google Scholar
  10. Mayer-Schӧnberger, V., & Ramge, T. (2018). Reinventing capitalism in the era of big data. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Page, W., & Lopatka, J. (2007). The Microsoft case: Antitrust, high technology, and consumer welfare. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pollock, R. (2010). Is Google the next Microsoft? Review of Network Economics, 9(4), 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shapiro, C. (2009). Microsoft: A remedial failure. Antitrust Law Journal, 75(3), 739–772.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technology Policy Institute, Washington DCJacksonUSA

Personalised recommendations