Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 537–554 | Cite as

The Digital Divide and Other Economic Considerations for Network Neutrality

Article

Abstract

In its 2016 Broadband Report, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recognizes that a rural/urban digital divide remains prevalent—especially with respect to broadband adoption. It also highlights several policies that the FCC has undertaken purportedly to reduce the divide, including the 2015 Open Internet Order (OIO)—in which the stated intent is to enforce “network neutrality.” However, long before the OIO, studies have raised concerns that network neutrality policies will discourage investment by internet service providers (ISPs) in broadband infrastructure, to the detriment of broadband accessibility, and may increase average consumer costs—both of which would only further exacerbate the digital divide. In this paper, we provide a holistic analysis of the effects of net neutrality on the digital divide; in doing so, we draw from recent economic research on this issue. Our goal is to present a range of economic considerations that should be taken into account when evaluating the overall impact of the OIO, with particular attention to its impact on the digital divide.

Keywords

Net neutrality Internet service providers Content service providers Digital divide Telecommunications Regulation Open Internet Order Welfare FCC Broadband 

JEL Classification

L96 L98 L51 K23 

References

  1. Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. The Rand Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, M., & Wright, J. (2007). Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Economic Theory, 32(2), 353–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S., Carlton, D. W., & Sider, H. S. (2010). Net neutrality and consumer welfare. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 6(3), 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brennan, T. (2016) The post-internet order broadband sector: Lessons from the pre-open internet order experience. Review of Industrial Organization (forthcoming). Google Scholar
  6. Cerf, V. G. (2006). Prepared statement of Vinton G. Cerf Vice President and Chief Internet Evangelist Google Inc. US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. Hearing on “Network Neutrality.” February, 7.Google Scholar
  7. Chipty, T. (2007). Station ownership and programming in radio. FCC Media Ownership Study #5.Google Scholar
  8. Choi, J. P., & Kim, B. C. (2010). Net neutrality and investment incentives. The Rand Journal of Economics, 41(3), 446–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connolly, M., & Prieger, J. E. (2013). A basic analysis of entry and exit in the US broadband market, 2005–2008. Review of Network Economics, 12(3), 229–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawford, G. (2008). The discriminatory incentives to bundle in the cable television industry. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 6(1), 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawford, G., & Cullen, J. (2007). Bundling, product choice, and efficiency: Should cable television networks be offered a la carte? Information Economics and Policy, 19, 379–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Economides, N., & Hermalin, B. E. (2012). The economics of network neutrality. The Rand Journal of Economics, 43(4), 602–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Economides, N., & Tåg, J. (2012). Network neutrality on the internet: A two-sided market analysis. Information Economics and Policy, 24(2), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Federal Communications Commission. (2005). (FCC 05-151). Retrieved from https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-151A1.pdf.
  15. Federal Communications Commission. (2009). High-speed services for internet access: Status as of June 30, 2008. Industry Analysis and Technology Division. Wireline Competition Bureau. July. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-292191A1.pdf.
  16. Federal Communications Commission. (2016). Broadband Progress Report: Significant Improvements But Digital Divide Persists.Google Scholar
  17. Frischmann, B. M., van Schewick, B. (2007). Network neutrality and the economics of an information superhighway: A reply to Professor Yoo. Jurimetrics, 47, 383–428.Google Scholar
  18. Genakos, C., & Valletti, T. (2012). Regulating prices in two-sided markets: The waterbed experience in mobile telephony. Telecommunications Policy, 36(5), 360–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenstein, S., Peitz, M., Valletti, T. (2016). Net neutrality: A fast lane to understanding the trade-offs. NBER Working Paper Series. Working paper 21950.Google Scholar
  20. Gryta, T., Ramachandran, S. (2016). Broadband data caps pressure ‘cord-cutters’. Wall Street Journal, April 21. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/broadband-data-caps-pressure-cord-cutters-1461257846.
  21. Hermalin, B. E., & Katz, M. L. (2007). The economics of product-line restrictions with an application to the network neutrality debate. Information Economics and Policy, 19(2), 215–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Horstmann, I., & Markusen, J. (1986). Up the average cost curve: Inefficient entry and the new protectionism. Journal of International Economics, 20(3–4), 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hylton, K. N. (2016). Law, social welfare, and net neutrality. Review of Industrial Organization (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  24. Jamison, M. A., Hauge, J. A. (2007). Getting what you pay for: Analyzing the net neutrality debate. University of Florida. PURC Working Paper.Google Scholar
  25. Katz, M. (2016). Wither the open internet order? Review of Industrial Organization (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  26. Krämer, J., & Wiewiorra, L. (2012). Network neutrality and congestion sensitive content providers: Implications for content variety, broadband investment, and regulation. Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1303–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, R. S., & Wu, T. (2009). Subsidizing creativity through network design: Zero-pricing and net neutrality. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (1999). Falling through the net: Defining the digital divide. Retrieved from https://www.ntia.doc.gov/legacy/ntiahome/fttn99/FTTN.pdf.
  29. Njoroge, P., Ozdaglar, A., Stier-Moses, N. E., & Weintraub, G. Y. (2013). Investment in two-sided markets and the net neutrality debate. Review of Network Economics, 12(4), 355–402.Google Scholar
  30. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peretto, P. (1996). Sunk costs, market structure, and growth. International Economic Review, 37(4), 895–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pew Research Survey. (2015). Digital divides 2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/09/22/digital-divides-2015/.
  33. Reggiani, C., Valletti, T. (2016). Net neutrality and innovation at the core and at the edge. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 63, 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Creative destruction. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  35. Singer, H. (2015). Does the tumble in broadband investment spell doom for the FCC’s Open Internet Order? Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/halsinger/2015/08/25/does-the-tumble-in-broadband-investment-spell-doom-for-the-fccs-open-internet-order/-621658042627.
  36. Sweeting, A. (2016) Too much rock and roll? Station ownership, programming, and listenership in the music radio industry, Northwestern University, January 15.Google Scholar
  37. Tirole, J. (1992). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). Computer and internet use in the United States: 2013. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/history/pdf/2013computeruse.pdf.
  39. van Schewick, B. (2007). Towards an economic framework for network neutrality regulation. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 5, 329–391.Google Scholar
  40. World Bank. (2015). Internet users (per 100 people). http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.P2.
  41. Waelbroeck, P. (2013). Digital music: Economic perspectives (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2249690). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2249690.
  42. Wu, T., & Yoo, C. S. (2007). Keeping the internet neutral?: Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo debate. Federal Communications Law Journal, 59(3), 06–27.Google Scholar
  43. Yoo, C. S. (2005). Beyond network neutrality. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 19(1), 1–77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations