Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 145–167 | Cite as

Explaining Variation in Title Charges: A Study of Five Metropolitan Residential Real Estate Markets

  • Robert M. FeinbergEmail author
  • Daniel Kuehn
  • Signe-Mary McKernan
  • Doug Wissoker
  • Sisi Zhang


Title charges are costs that are related to establishing and insuring title in a real estate transaction. These charges vary considerably and include title insurance premiums and other fees involved in closing a mortgage loan. This study analyzes the variation in title charges using data from almost 3,000 FHA-insured, 30-year fixed-rate home purchase loans in five metropolitan areas. Even after controlling for cost-related and other characteristics, more than one-half of the variation in title charges remains unexplained in four of the five markets. Substantial differences in charges between settlement agents suggest that consumers would benefit by shopping for settlement services.


Title insurance Real estate settlement Housing 



This article is based on a report funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Order Number C-CHI-01027CHI-T0001. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. We thank William Reid, William Reeder, Kurt Usowski, and all of HUD’s Office of Policy Development and Research staff for their helpful suggestions. The authors also thank the settlement agents, industry representatives, and title insurance experts who contributed to our understanding of the industry, as well as Larry White and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on an earlier draft.


  1. Birnbaum, B. (2005). An analysis of competition in the California title insurance and Escrow industry. Report to the California Insurance Commissioner. Retrieved from:
  2. The Chicago Bar Association v. Quinlan and Tyson, Inc. 34 Ill. 2d 117, 1966.Google Scholar
  3. Dumm, R. E., Macpherson, D. A., & Sirmans, G. S. (2007). The title insurance industry: Examining a decade of growth. Journal of Insurance Regulation, 25(4), 24–51.Google Scholar
  4. Eaton, J. W. (2009, May 28). Title insurance reform: A long overlooked target of opportunity—The governor and the legislature should embrace it. Testimony to the hearing on title insurance rate regulation under the auspices of the Pennsylvania Insurance Commission. Harrisburg, PA.Google Scholar
  5. Eaton, J., & Eaton, D. (2007). The American Title Insurance Industry: How a Cartel Fleeces the American Consumer. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  6. Elder, Harold, Zumpano, Leonard, & Baryla, Edward. (2000). Buyer-brokers: Do they make a difference? Their influence on selling price and search duration. Real Estate Economics, 28(2), 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jaffee, D. (2006). Monoline restrictions, with applications to mortgage insurance and title insurance. Review of Industrial Organization, 28(2), 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lacko, James, & Pappalardo, Janis. (2010). The failures and promise of mandated consumer mortgage disclosures: Evidence from qualitative interviews and a controlled experiment with mortgage borrowers. The American Economic Review, 100(2), 516–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lewis, H. (2014). Closing Costs Study. Retrieved from:
  10. McKernan, S., Wissoker, D., Ratcliffe, C., Van Order, B., & Scott, M. (2009). Descriptive analysis of FHA settlement charges. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Owen, B. M. (1977). Kickbacks, specialization, price fixing, and efficiency in residential real estate markets. Stanford Law Review, 29(5), 931–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roussel, H. L., & Rosenberg, M. K. (1981). The high price of ‘Reform’: Title insurance rates and the benefits of rating bureaus. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 48(4), 638–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Turner, M. A., Ross, S. L., Galster, G. C., & Yinger, J. (2002). Discrimination in metropolitan housing markets: National results from phase I HDS2000. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  14. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2007). Title insurance: Actions needed to improve oversight of the title industry and better protect consumers. Washington, DC: GAO.Google Scholar
  15. White, L. J. (1984). The title insurance industry, reverse competition, and controlled business: A different view. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 51(2), 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Woodward, S. E. (2008). A study of closing costs for FHA mortgages. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Woodward, S. E., & Hall, R. (2010). Consumer confusion in the mortgage market: Evidence of less than a perfectly transparent and competitive market. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 100, 511–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert M. Feinberg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel Kuehn
    • 1
    • 2
  • Signe-Mary McKernan
    • 2
  • Doug Wissoker
    • 2
  • Sisi Zhang
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsAmerican UniversityWashington DCUSA
  2. 2.The Urban InstituteWashington DCUSA
  3. 3.Shanghai University of Finance and EconomicsShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations