Advertisement

Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 109–129 | Cite as

A New Method for Estimating Market Power with an Application to Norwegian Sawmilling

  • Subal C. KumbhakarEmail author
  • Sjur Baardsen
  • Gudbrand Lien
Article

Abstract

In this paper we apply an innovative econometric tool to estimate mark-ups in an output market. The contribution of the paper is in the novel use of the stochastic frontier approach that is widely used to estimate efficiency. We show that this method, which we call the stochastic frontier estimator of market power, can be used both in the dual cost function framework and in the primal framework, and that mark-ups can be estimated with or without constant returns to scale. We apply this method to the Norwegian sawmilling industry, 1974–91.

Keywords

Input distance function Market failure Market power Sawmilling Stochastic frontier 

JEL Classification

L11 L12 L73 D22 C54 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baardsen S. (2000) An econometric analysis of Norwegian sawmilling 1974–1981 based on mill-level data. Forest Science 46(4): 537–547Google Scholar
  2. Baardsen S. (2003) A multi-output restricted profit function for Norwegian sawmilling. In: Helles F., Strange N., Wichmann L. (eds) Recent accomplishments in applied forest economics research, forestry sciences, Vol. 74. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 129–139Google Scholar
  3. Berger A. N., Mester L. J. (1997) Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions?. Journal of Banking and Finance 21: 895–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger A. N., Mester L. J. (2003) Explaining the dramatic changes in performance of US banks: Technological change, deregulation, and dynamic changes in competition. Journal of Financial Intermediation 12: 57–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bresnahan T. F. (1989) Empirical studies of industries with market power. In: Schmalensee R., Willig R. (eds) Handbook of industrial organization, Vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1011–1057Google Scholar
  6. Buongiorno J., Lu H.-C. (1989) Effects of costs, demand, and labor productivity on the prices of forest products in the United States, 1958–1984. Forest Science 35(2): 349–363Google Scholar
  7. Carlton D. W., Perloff J. M. (2005) Modern industrial organization. Pearson, Addison, Wesley, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Coelli T. J., Rao D. S. P., O’Donnell C. J., Battese G. E. (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  9. Färe R., Primont D. (1995) Multi-output production and duality: Theory and applications. Kluwer, Boston, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greene W. (2009) The econometric approach to efficiency analysis. In: Fried H. O., Lovell C. A. K., Shelton S. S. (eds) The measurement of productivity efficiency and productivity growth. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp 92–250Google Scholar
  11. Hall R. E., Jorgenson D. W. (1967) Tax policy and investment behavior. American Economic Review 57: 391–414Google Scholar
  12. Jondrow J., Lovell C. A. K., Materov I. S., Schmidt P. (1982) On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics 19: 233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kadiyali V., Sudhir K., Vithala R. R. (2001) Structural analysis of competitive behavior: New empirical industrial organization methods in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing 18: 161–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumbhakar S. C. (2006) Productivity and efficiency measurement using parametric econometric methods. In: Bagella M., Becchetti L., Hasan I. (eds) Transparency, governance, and markets. Elsevier, Oxford, UK, pp 21–61Google Scholar
  15. Kumbhakar S. C. (2011) Estimation of production technology when the objective is to maximize return to the outlay. European Journal of Operation Research 208: 170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumbhakar S. C., Lovell C. A. K. (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Lerner A. P. (1934) The concept of monopoly and the measurement of monopoly power. Review of Economic Studies 1(3): 157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luppold W. (1996) An explanation of hardwood sawn wood pricing. Forest Products Journal 46(5): 52–55Google Scholar
  19. Morrison C. J. (1992) Markups in US and Japanese manufacturing: A short-run econometric analysis. Journal of Business & Statistics 10: 51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nordstrand, E. A. (1999). Markedsmakt i et regionalisert sagtømmermarked. MSc thesis. Agricultural University of Norway.Google Scholar
  21. Nyrud A. Q., Baardsen S. (2003) Production efficiency and productivity growth in Norwegian sawmilling. Forest Science 49: 89–97Google Scholar
  22. Nyrud A. Q., Bergseng E. R. (2002) Production efficiency and size in Norwegian sawmilling. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 17: 566–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Perloff, J. M., & Shen, E. Z. (2012). Collinearity in linear structural models of market power. Review of Industrial Organization. doi: 10.1007/s11151-012-9336-x.
  24. Perloff J. M., Karp L. S., Golan A. (2007) Estimating market power and strategies. Cambridge University Press, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pindyck R. S. (1985) The measurement of monopoly power in dynamic markets. Journal of Law and Economics 28(1): 193–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosko M. D., Mutter R. L. (2011) What have we learned from the application of stochastic frontier analysis to US hospitals?. Medical Care Research Review 68(1 suppl): 75–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seo D., Featherstone A. M., Weisman D. L., Gao Y. (2010) Market consolidation and productivity growth in US wireline telecommunications: Stochastic frontier analysis vs Malmquist index. Review of Industrial Organization 36(3): 271–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Størdal S., Baardsen S. (2002) Estimating price taking behavior with mill-level data: The Norwegian sawlog market, 1974–1991. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32: 401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tremblay V.J., Tremblay C.H. (2012) New perspectives on industrial organization: With contributions from behavioral economics and game theory. NY: Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Weiher J. C., Sickles R. C., Perloff J. M. (2002) Market power in the US airline industry. In: Slottje D. J. (eds) Measuring market power. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 309–324Google Scholar
  31. Wolfram C. D. (1999) Measuring market power in the British electricity spot market. American Economic Review 89(4): 805–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subal C. Kumbhakar
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Sjur Baardsen
    • 2
    • 3
  • Gudbrand Lien
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsState University of New YorkBinghamtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Natural Resource ManagementNorwegian University of Life SciencesAasNorway
  3. 3.Eastern Norway Research InstituteLillehammerNorway
  4. 4.Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research InstituteOsloNorway
  5. 5.Lillehammer University CollegeLillehammerNorway

Personalised recommendations