Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 299–313 | Cite as

Revenue Sharing and Competitive Balance When Teams are not Wage Takers

Article

Abstract

Recent papers have enriched the conventional modeling of teams’ behavior through a game theoretic background at the competition level (introducing a contest success function). We take a step forward and consider contest on the talent market as well. Each team takes into account the fact that the price to be paid recruiting talent is a function that depends on both its own demand and the demands from the rival teams. For the two-team model, we show that the removal of the assumption that teams are price takers implies that the invariance proposition only survives if the price-function for talent is linear increasing. The extension to the n-team model shows that this result no longer holds; in fact, revenue sharing improves the competitive balance. More generally, an improvement in competitive balance is the most likely if one rules out the possibility of a very convex price-function. In addition revenue sharing can reduce the economic inefficiency of teams’ behavior, and so profits may increase.

Keywords

Contest Market for talent Competitive balance Revenue sharing 

JEL Classification

C72 K23 L83 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dietl H. M., Lang M. (2008) The effect of gate revenue sharing on social welfare. Contemporary Economic Policy 26(3): 448–459Google Scholar
  2. El-Hodiri M., Quirk J. (1971) An economic model of a professional sports league. Journal of Political Economy 79: 1302–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Easton S. T., Rockerbie D. W. (2005) Revenue sharing, conjectures, and scarce talent in a sports league model. Journal of Sports Economics 6(4): 359–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fort R., Quirk J. (1995) Cross-subsidization, incentives, and outcomes in professional team sports leagues. Journal of Economic Literature XXXIII: 1265–1299Google Scholar
  5. Fort, R., & Winfree, J. (2008). Talent supply, the contest success function, and the invariance proposition. Downloadable at: www.rodneyfort.com/AcademicWork/CurrentEfforts/UnderReview.
  6. Késenne S. (2000) Revenue sharing and competitive balance in professional team sports. Journal of Sports Economics 1(1): 56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Késenne S. (2004) Competitive balance and revenue sharing. When rich clubs have poor teams. Journal of Sports Economics 5(2): 206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Késenne S. (2006) The win maximization model reconsidered. Flexible talent supply and efficiency wages. Journal of Sports Economics 7(4): 416–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marburger D. R. (1997) Gate revenue sharing and luxury taxes in professional sports. Contemporary Economic Policy XV: 114–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Palomino, F., & Rigotti, L. (2002). The sport league’s dilemma: Competitive balance versus incentives to win. Unpublished manuscript, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  11. Sandy, R., Sloane, P., & Treble, J. (2006). Back to basics: A new look at gate-revenue sharing and competitive balance. IASE—Working Paper Series, Paper No 06-07.Google Scholar
  12. Szymanski S. (2003a) The economic design of sporting contests. Journal of Economic Literature XLI: 1137–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Szymanski S. (2003b) Incentives and competitive balance in team sports. European Sport Management Quarterly 3(1): 11–30Google Scholar
  14. Szymanski S. (2004) Professional team sports are only a game. The Walrasian fixed-supply conjecture model, Contest-Nash equilibrium, and the invariance principle. Journal of Sports Economics 5(2): 111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Szymanski S., Késenne S. (2004) Competitive balance and gate revenue sharing in team sports. The Journal of Industrial Economics LII(1): 165–177Google Scholar
  16. Treble, J. G. (2005). A new model of sports leagues. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wales Swansea.Google Scholar
  17. Vrooman J. (1995) A general theory of professional sports leagues. Southern Economic Journal 61(4): 971–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Toulouse School of Economics (LERNA)ToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations