Advertisement

Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 349–370 | Cite as

Industry Dynamics in the Swedish Textile and Wearing Apparel Sector

  • Joakim Gullstrand
Original paper

Abstract

This paper analyses the adjustment process within the Swedish textile and wearing apparel sector and finds results that support the notion of Schumpeter’s ‘creative’ destruction. The turnover of plants and jobs seems to ‘improve’ the industries from within due to an exit (entry) of less (more) productive plants, exit (entry) of old (new) incumbents, a destruction (creation) of less (more) human-capital intensive jobs, and a supply of new products on the world market. The econometric analysis of the probability of exit with plant, firm and industry characteristics supports the idea of a rationalisation from within.

Keywords

creative destruction entry exit import competition plant level. 

JEL Classifications

F1 D2 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldwin J. R. (1998), paper edition, The Dynamics of Industrial Competition: A North American Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard A., and J.B. Jensen (2002) ‘The deaths of manufacturing plants’, NBER Working Paper Series WP9026.Google Scholar
  3. Brülhart, M. 1999Marginal Intra-Industry Trade and Trade-Induced Adjustment: A SurveyBrülhart, M.Hine, R.C. eds. Intra-Industry Trade and Adjustment: The European ExperienceMacMillan PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabral, L. 1995Sunk Cost, Firm Size and Firm GrowthJournal of Industrial Economics43161172Google Scholar
  5. Dumais, G., Ellison, G., Glaeser, E.L. 2000Geographic Concentration as a Dynamic ProcessReview of Economics84193204Google Scholar
  6. Duranton, G., Puga, D. 2000Diversity and Specialisation in Cities: Why, Where and When Does It Matter?Urban Studies37533555Google Scholar
  7. Faley, R., D. Greenaway, and Z. Yu (2004) ‘Intra-industry Trade Between Asymmetric Countries with Heterogeneous Firms’, GEP Research Paper 04/05.Google Scholar
  8. Graziani, G. 2001International Subcontracting in the Textile and Clothing IndustryArndt, S.W.Kierzkowski, H. eds. Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in the World EconomyOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Hopenhayn, H. 1992Entry, Exit, and Firm Dynamics in Long Run EquilibriumEconometrica6011271150Google Scholar
  10. Jenkins, S.P. 1995Practitioner’s Corner, Easy Estimation Methods for Discrete-Time Duration ModelsOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics57129138Google Scholar
  11. Jovanovic, B. 1982Selection and the Evolution of IndustryEconometrica50649670Google Scholar
  12. Krugman, P. 1980Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of TradeAmerican Economic Review70950959Google Scholar
  13. Levinsohn, J., and W. Petropoulos (2001) ‘Creative Destruction of Just Plain Destruction?: The U.S. Textile and Apparel Industries since 1972’, NBER Working Paper Series WP8348.Google Scholar
  14. Melitz, M. 2003The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry ProductivityEconometrica7116951725Google Scholar
  15. Olley, S.G., Pakes, A. 1996The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment IndustryEconometrica6412631297Google Scholar
  16. Schumpeter, J.A. 1942Capitalism, Socialism, and DemocracyHarper & RowNew YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations