Language skills and homophilous hiring discrimination: Evidence from gender and racially differentiated applications

  • Anthony Edo
  • Nicolas Jacquemet
  • Constantine Yannelis
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates the importance of ethnic homophily in the hiring discrimination process. Our evidence comes from a correspondence test performed in France in which we use three different kinds of ethnic identification: French sounding names, North African sounding names, and “foreign” sounding names with no clear ethnic association. Within the groups of men and women, we show that all non-French applicants are equally discriminated against when compared to French applicants. Moreover, we find direct evidence of ethnic homophily: recruiters with European names are more likely to call back French named applicants. These results show the importance of favoritism for in-group members. To test for the effect of information about applicant’s skills, we also add a signal related to language ability in all resumes sent to half the job offers. The design allows to uniquely identify the effect of the language signal by gender. Although the signal inclusion significantly reduces the discrimination against non-French females, it is much weaker for male minorities.

Keywords

Correspondence testing Gender discrimination Racial discrimination Ethnic homophily Language skills 

JEL Classification

J15 J64 J71 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge David Neumark for sharing his data and estimation programs with us. We also thank Francis Bloch, Nick Bloom, Emmanuel Duguet, Christelle Dumas, Raquel Fernandez, Stéphane Gauthier, James Heckman, Shelly Lundberg, Muriel Niederle, Phillip Oreopoulos, Paolo Pin, Chris Taber, Marie-Anne Valfort as well as participants to various conferences and seminars for their thoughtful comments on the paper. We are grateful to the CEPREMAP for financial support. Nicolas Jacquemet acknowledges the Institut Universitaire de France for its support. Constantine Yannelis thanks the Alexander S. Onassis foundation for generous support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Adida, C., Laitin, D., & Valfort, M. (2010). Identifying barriers to Muslim integration in France. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(52), 22384–22390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altonji, J., & Pierret, C. (2001). Employer learning and statistical discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 313–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K. (1973). The theory of discrimination. In O. Ashenfelter & A. Rees (Ed.), Discrimination in Labor Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1971). The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Booth, A., Leigh, A., & Varganova, E. (2012). Does ethnic discrimination vary across minority groups? Evidence from a field experiment. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74(4), 547–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bramoullé, Y., & Rogers, B. W. (2009). Diversity and popularity in social networks. CIRPEE Discussion Paper, 09(03).Google Scholar
  8. Carlsson, M., & Rooth, D.-O. (2007). Evidence of ethnic discrimination in the Swedish labor market using experimental data. Labour Economics, 14(4), 716–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiswick, B. R., & Houseworth, C. (2011). Ethnic intermarriage among immigrants: Human capital and assortative mating. Review of Economics of the Household, 9(2), 149–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Currarini, S., Jackson, M. O., & Pin, P. (2009). An economic model of friendship: Homophily, minorities, and segregation. Econometrica : Journal of the Econometric Society, 77(4), 1003–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Currarini, S., & Mengel, F. (2012). Identity, Homophily and In-Group Bias. FEEM Working Paper.Google Scholar
  13. Daussin, J.-M., Keskpaik, S., & Rocher, T. (2011). L'évolution du nombre d'élèves en difficulté face à l'écrit depuis une dizaine d’années. INSEE, France, Portrait Social, 95.Google Scholar
  14. Dechief, D., & Oreopoulos, P. (2012). Why do some employers prefer to interview Matthew but not Samir? New evidence from Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver. CLSRN Working Papers, (2012-8).Google Scholar
  15. Doleac, J., & Stein, L. (2013). The visible hand: Race and online market outcomes. Economic Journal, 123(572), F469–F492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duguet, E., Du Parquet, L., L’Horty, Y., & Petit, P. (2015). First order Stochastic dominance and the measurement of hiring discrimination: A ranking extension of correspondence testings with an application to gender and origin. Annals of Economics and Statistics, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  17. Duguet, E., Leandri, N., L’Horty, Y., & Petit, P. (2010). Are young French jobseekers of ethnic immigrant origin discriminated against? A controlled experiment in the Paris area. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 99/100, 187–215.Google Scholar
  18. Giuliano, L., Levine, D., & Leonard, J. (2009). Manager race and the race of new hires. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(4), 589–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giuliano, L., Levine, D. I., & Leonard, J. (2011). Racial bias in the manager-employee relationship: An analysis of quits, dismissals, and promotions at a large retail firm. Journal of Human Resources, 46(1), 26–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldberg, M. S. (1982). Discrimination, nepotism, and long-run wage differentials. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(2), 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grossbard, S. A., Gimenez-Nadal, J. I., & Molina, J. A., et al. (2014). Racial intermarriage and household production. Review of Behavioral Economics, 1(4), 295–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grossbard-Shechtman, S. (1993). On the economics of marriage: a theory of marriage labor and divorce. Boulder Colorado/Oxford England: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  23. Habyarimana, J. P., Humphreys, M., Posner, D. N., & Weinstein, J. (2007). Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision? American Political Science Review, 101(4), 709–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamm, J. V. (2000). Do birds of a feather flock together? The variable bases for African American, Asian American, and European American adolescents’ selection of similar friends. Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heckman, J., & Siegelman, P. (1993). Clear and convincing evidence: Measurement of discrimination in americachap. In M. Fix & R. Struyk (Ed.), The urban institute audit studies: Their methods and findings (pp. 187–258). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  26. Heckman, J. J. (1998). Detecting Discrimination. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(2), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of management Journal, 38(3), 673–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson, M. O., & Rogers, B. W. (2007). Meeting strangers and friends of friends: How random are social networks? American Economic Review, 97(3), 890–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacquemet, N., & Yannelis, C. (2012). Indiscriminate discrimination: A correspondence test for ethnic homophily in the Chicago labor market. Labour Economics, 19(6), 824–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kets, W., & Sandroni, A. (2016). A belief-based theory of homophily. mimeo. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2871514 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2871514.
  31. Kossinets, G., & Watts, D. J. (2009). Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. American Journal of Sociology, 115(2), 405–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger, T. Abel & C. Page (Ed.), Freedom and Control in Modern Society (pp. 18–66). New-York, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  33. Lincoln, J. R., & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relation networks. Administrative science quarterly, 24, 181–199.Google Scholar
  34. Lundberg, S., & Startz, R. (2004). Information and racial exclusion. Journal of Population Economics, 20(3), 621–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mollica, K. A., Gray, B., & Treviño, L. K. (2003). Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers’ social networks. Organization Science, 14(2), 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Neumark, D. (2012). Detecting discrimination in audit and correspondence studies. Journal of Human Resources, 47(4), 1128–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oreopoulos, P. (2011). Why do skilled immigrants struggle in the labor market? A field experiment with six thousand resumes. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(4), 148–171.Google Scholar
  39. Pager, D., Western, B., & Bonikowski, B. (2009). Discrimination in a low-wage labor market: A field experiment. American Sociological Review, 74(5), 777–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Phelps, E. S. (1972). The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review, 62(4), 659–661.Google Scholar
  41. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramachandran, R., & Rauh, C. (2013). Discrimination without taste - How discrimination can spillover and persist. Working paper.Google Scholar
  43. Riach, P. A., & Rich, J. (2002). Field experiments of discrimination in the market place. Economic Journal, 112(483), F480–F518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salamanca, N., & Feld, J. (2016). A short note on discrimination and favoritism in the labor market. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics.Google Scholar
  45. Shrum, W., Cheek Jr, N. H., & MacD, S. (1988). Friendship in school: Gender and racial homophily. Sociology of Education, 61, 227–239.Google Scholar
  46. Stoll, M. A., Raphael, S., & Holzer, H. J. (2004). Black job applicants and the hiring officer’s race. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 57(2), 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Trimaille, C. (2004). Pratiques langagiéres chez des adolescents d’origine maghrébine. Hommes et Migrations, 1252, 66–73.Google Scholar
  48. Vallet, L.-A., & Caille, J.-P. (1996). Niveau en français et en mathématiques des élèves étrangers ou issus de l’immigration. Économie et statistique, 293(1), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vigil, J. M., & Venner, K. (2012). Prejudicial behavior: More closely linked to homophilic peer preferences than to trait bigotry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(6), 448–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Westhoff, C., & Frejka, T. (2007). Religiousness and fertility among European muslims. Population and Development Review, 33(4), 785–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wimmer, A., & Lewis, K. (2010). Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. American Journal of Sociology, 116(2), 583–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yatchew, A., & Griliches, Z. (1985). Specification error in probit models. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(1), 134–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Edo
    • 1
  • Nicolas Jacquemet
    • 2
  • Constantine Yannelis
    • 3
  1. 1.CEPII. 113 rue de GrenelleParisFrance
  2. 2.Paris School of Economics and University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne, 106 Bd de l’hopitalParisFrance
  3. 3.NYU Stern School of BusinessNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations