Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 89–119 | Cite as

Changes in parental leave and young children’s non-cognitive skills

  • Katrin HuberEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study examines the effect of substantial changes in parental leave regulations on the non-cognitive development of children aged between 0 and 3 years. I exploit a large and unanticipated parental leave reform in Germany as a natural experiment. Since the first of January 2007, the replacement of a means-tested by an earnings-related system led to a gain in benefits for wealthier families whereas needier parents receive a lower overall benefit amount than before the reform. I detect a significant negative effect of this change in the parental leave system on the socio-emotional development of newborns and it turns out that children from loser-families drive this effect. The parental leave reform does not have a significant impact on 2–3-year-olds’ skills and development on average and the difference between children from losers and winners does also not persist in the longer run. I only find suggestive evidence that an increase in benefits improves some skills of 2–3-year-olds if compared to those who experience reductions in benefits.

Keywords

Children Family policy Parental leave Non-cognitive skills 

JEL Classification

J13  J18 J22 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper benefited greatly from the valuable advice provided by Stefan Bauernschuster. I also thank Ramona Molitor, Susanna Grundmann, Erwin Winkler and Anna Raute, as well as the participants of several seminars in Passau and of the EALE 2016, VfS 2015, ESPE 2015 and SSES 2015 conferences for their insightful comments. I am also grateful to two anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions. Helen Zeidler provided excellent research assistance.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author has received a conference subsidy for young academics from the Verein für Socialpolitik for presenting this paper at the ESPE in Izmir 2015. The author declares that she has no further conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11150_2017_9380_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.6 mb)
Supplementary Information

References

  1. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometris—An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, M., & Milligan, K. (2010). Evidence from maternity leave expansions of the impact of maternal care on early child development. Journal of Human Resources, 45(1), 1–32.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, M., & Milligan, K. (2015). Maternity leave and children’s cognitive and behavioral development. Journal of Population Economics, 28(2), 373–391.Google Scholar
  4. Baum, II, C. L. (2003). Does early maternal employment harm child development? An analysis of the potential benefits of leave taking. Journal of Labor Economics, 21(2), 409–448.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G., & Lewis, H. (1974). Interaction between quantity and quality of children. In T. W. Schultz (Ed.), Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital (pp. 81–90). Chicago:  University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bergemann, A., & Riphahn, R. T. (2011a). Female labour supply and parental leave benefits—the causal effect of paying higher transfers for a shorter period of time. Applied Economics Letters, 18, 17–20.Google Scholar
  7. Bergemann, A., & Riphahn, R. T. (2011b). The introduction of short-term earnings-related parental leave benefit system and differential effects on employment intentions. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 131, 315–325.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, E. M., & Spiess, K. (2011). Maternal life satisfaction and child outcomes: Are they related? Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 142–158.Google Scholar
  9. Beuchert, L. V., Humlum, M. K., & Vejlin, R. (2016). The length of maternity leave and family health. Labour Economics, 43, 55–71.Google Scholar
  10. Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ) (2013). Elterngeld und Elternzeit—das Bundeselterngeld- und Elternzeitgesetz (13th ed.). BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Brooks-Gunn, J., & Duncan, G. J. (1997). The effects of poverty on children. The Future of the Children—Children and Poverty, 7(2), 55–71.Google Scholar
  12. Brooks-Gunn, J., Han, W. J., & Waldfogel, J. (2002). Maternal employment and child cognitive outcomes in the first three years of life: The NICHD study of early child care. Child Development, 73(4), 1052–1072.Google Scholar
  13. Buckles, K., & Hungerman, D. M. (2013). Season of birth and later outcomes: Old questions, new answers. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(3), 711–724.Google Scholar
  14. Carlson, M. J. (2006). Family structure, father involvement, and adolescent behavioral outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(1), 137–154.Google Scholar
  15. Carneiro, P., Loken, K. V., & Salvanes, K. G. (2015). A flying start? Maternity leave benefits and long run outcomes of children. Journal of Political Economy, 123(2), 365–412.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.Google Scholar
  17. Crockett, L. J., Eggebeen, D. J., & Hawkins, A. J. (1993). Father’s presence and young children’s behavioral and cognitive adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 14(3), 355–377.Google Scholar
  18. Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. (2007). The technology of skill formation. American Economic Review, 97(2), 31–47.Google Scholar
  19. Currie, J., & Schwandt, H. (2013). Within-mother analysis of seasonal patterns in health at birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(30), 12265–12270.Google Scholar
  20. Cygan-Rehm, K. (2016). Parental leave benefit and differential fertility responses: Evidence from a German reform. Journal of Population Economics, 29(1), 73–103.Google Scholar
  21. Dahl, J. B., Loken, K. V., Mogstad, M., & Salvanes, K. V. (2016). What is the case for paid maternity leave? Review of Econonomics and Statistics, 98(4), 655–670.Google Scholar
  22. Danzer, N., Halla, M., Schneeweis, N., & Zweimüller, M. (2017). Parental leave, (in)formal childcare and long-term child outcomes. IZA DP No. 10812. http://ftp.iza.org/dp10812.pdf.
  23. Danzer, N., & Lavy, V. (2017). Paid parental leave and children’s schooling outcomes. The Economic Journal, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  24. Del Bono, E., Francesconi, M., Kelly, Y., & Sacker, A. (2016). Early maternal time investments and early child outcomes. The Economic Journal, 126, F96–F135.Google Scholar
  25. Destatis. (2008). Statistik zum Elterngeld—Anträge von Januar 2007 bis Juni. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
  26. Dustmann, C., & Schönberg, U. (2011). Expansions in maternity leave coverage and children’s long-term outcomes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(3), 190–224.Google Scholar
  27. Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identität und Lebenszyklus (6th ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  28. Felfe, C., & Lalive, R. (2010). How does early child care affect child development? Learning from the children of German unification. In Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Sozialpolitik 2010: Ökonomie der Familie—Session: Economics of Child Care and Child Development. B11–V2. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/37432.
  29. Felfe, C., & Lalive, R. (2014). Does early child care help or hurt children’s development? IZA Discussion Paper, (8484). http://ftp.iza.org/dp8484.pdf.
  30. Friendly, M., & Costigliola, B. (2014). Coming in 2020—a national child care program for Canada. Our Schools/Our Selves, 24(1), 91–100.Google Scholar
  31. Geisler, E., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2012). How policy matters: Germany’s parental leave benefit reform and fathers’ behavior 1999-2009. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research: MPIDR Working Paper, 2012–021.Google Scholar
  32. Geyer, J., Haan, P., & Wrohlich, K. (2015). The effects of family policy on maternal labor supply: combining evidence from a structural model and a quasi-experimental approach. Labour Economics, 36, 84–98.Google Scholar
  33. Harris, K. M., Furstenberg, F. F., Marmer, Jr., & Marmer, J. K. (1998). Paternal involvement with adolescents in intact families: The influence of fathers over the life course. Demography, 35(2), 201–216.Google Scholar
  34. Hill, J. L., Waldfogel, J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Han, W. J. (2005). Maternal employment and child development: A fresh look using newer methods. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), 833–850.Google Scholar
  35. Huber, K. (2015). Moving to an earnings-related parental leave system—do heterogeneous effects on parents make some children worse off? SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research, (791). https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.514937.de/diw_sp0791.pdf.Google Scholar
  36. Jacobs, B. S., & Moss, H. M. (1976). Birth order and sex of sibling as determinants of mother-infant interaction. Child Development, 47(2), 315–322.Google Scholar
  37. Janta, B. (2014). Caring for children in europe how childcare, parental leave and flexible working arrangements interact in europe. European Union, European Platform for Investing in Children, DG Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion. http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/33850725.pdf.
  38. Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., & Katz, L. F. (2007). Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects. Econometrica, 75(1), 83–119.Google Scholar
  39. Kluve, J., & Schmitz, S. (2017). Back to work: parental benefits and mothers’ labor market outcomes in the medium-run. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, (forthcoming). http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0019793917710933.
  40. Kluve, J., & Tamm, M. (2013). Parental leave regulations, mothers’ labor force attachment and fathers’ childcare involvement: evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Population Economics, 26(3), 983–1005.Google Scholar
  41. Kottwitz, A., Oppermann, A., & Spieß, K. (2016). Parental leave benefits and breastfeeding in Germany: Effects of the 2007 reform. Review of Economics of the Household, 14(4), 859–890.Google Scholar
  42. Lalive, R., & Zweimüller, J. (2009). How does parental leave affect fertility and return to work? Evidence from two natural experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1363–1402.Google Scholar
  43. Liu, Q., & Skans, O. S. (2010). The duration of paid parental leave and children’s scholastic performance. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 10(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
  44. Maeder, M. (2014). Earnings-related parental leave benefits and subjective well-being of young mothers: Evidence from a German parental leave reform. BGPE Discussion Paper, (148).Google Scholar
  45. Neidell, M. J. (2000). Early parental time investments in children’s human capital development: Effects of time in the first year on cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes. UCLA Department of Economics Working Paper, (806).Google Scholar
  46. Neugart, M., & Ohlsson, H. (2013). Economic incentives and the timing of births: Evidence from the German parental benefit reform of 2007. Journal of Population Economics, 26(1), 87–108.Google Scholar
  47. OECD (2003–04). Early childhood education and care policy—country note Canada, http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/33850725.pdf.
  48. Raute, A. (2016). Can financial incentives reduce the baby gap?- Evidence from a reform in maternity leave benefits, (mimeo). https://annaraute.wordpress.com/research/.Google Scholar
  49. Rossin, M. (2011). The effects of maternity leave on children’s birth and infant health outcomes in the United States. Journal of Health Economics, 30(2), 221–239.Google Scholar
  50. Ruhm, C. J. (1998). The economic consequences of parental leave mandates: Lessons from Europe. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 285–317.Google Scholar
  51. Ruhm, C. J. (2004). Parental employment and child cognitive development. The Journal of Human Resources, 39(1), 155–192.Google Scholar
  52. RWI (2008). Evaluation des Gesetzes zum Elterngeld und zur Elternzeit, Endbericht.Google Scholar
  53. Sandner, M., & Jungmann, T. (2016). How much can we trust maternal ratings of early child development in disadvantaged samples? Economics Letters, 141, 73–76.Google Scholar
  54. Schmiade, N., Spieß, K., & Tietze, W. (2008). Zur Erhebung des adaptiven Verhaltens von zwei—und dreijährigen Kindern im Sozio-Oekonomischen Panel (SOEP). SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research, (116).Google Scholar
  55. Schönberg, U., & Ludsteck, J. (2014). Expansions in maternity leave coverage and mothers’ labor market outcomes after childbirth. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(3), 469–505.Google Scholar
  56. SOEP v28 (2012). Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), data for years 1984-2011, version 28, SOEP. doi: 10.5684/soep.v28.
  57. Sparrow, S. S., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1985). Diagnostic uses of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 10(2), 215–225.Google Scholar
  58. Tamm, M. (2013). The impact of a large parental leave benefit reform on the timing of birth around the day of implementation. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 75(4), 585–601.Google Scholar
  59. Verlag C.H. BECK oHG (2015). beck-aktuell Gesetzgebung, Entwicklungsgeschichte Elterngeld. http://gesetzgebung.beck.de/node/185751, Accessed 20 Feb 2015.
  60. Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel study (SOEP)—scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127(1), 139–169.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of PassauPassauGermany

Personalised recommendations