Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 377–406 | Cite as

The earned income tax credit and union formation: The impact of expected spouse earnings

  • Katherine Michelmore
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Using the Survey of Income and Program Participation from 2001, 2004, and 2008 and federal and state variation in earned income tax credit generosity over time, I investigate how changes in expected household earned income tax credit benefits associated with marriage affect cohabitation and marriage behavior among low-income single mothers. I simulate a marriage market to predict potential spouse earnings for a sample of single mothers in order to estimate the potential losses or gains in earned income tax credit benefits upon marriage. Using multinomial logistic regressions, I then analyze how the anticipated loss in earned income tax credit benefits upon marriage affects the likelihood of marrying or cohabiting. Results suggest that the average earned income tax credit-eligible woman can expect to lose approximately US$1,300 in earned income tax credit benefits in the year following marriage, or about half of pre-marriage benefits. Single mothers who expect to lose earned income tax credit benefits upon marriage are 2.5 percentage points less likely to marry their partners and 2.5 percentage points more likely to cohabit compared to single mothers who expect no change or to gain earned income tax credit benefits upon marriage. Despite recent policy efforts to reduce the size of the marriage penalty embedded in the earned income tax credit structure, these results suggest that the earned income tax credit still creates distortions in marriage and cohabitation decisions among low-income single mothers.

Keywords

Earned income tax credit Marriage Cohabitation Marriage penalties 

JEL Classification

H2 I38 J12 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Michael Lovenheim, Kelly Musick, Sharon Sassler, and Laura Tach for helpful advice and comments. She would also like to acknowledge support from the Institute for Education Sciences on grant R305B110001. Any remaining errors are the author’s own.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11150_2016_9348_MOESM1_ESM.docx (50 kb)
Supplementary Information

References

  1. Alm, J., Dickert-Conlin, S., & Whittington, L. A. (1999). Policy watch: The marriage penalty. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(3), 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alm, J., & Whittington, L. A. (2003). Shacking up or shelling out: Income taxes, marriage, and cohabitation. Review of Economics of the Household, 1(3), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baughman, R., & Dickert-Conlin, S. (2009). The earned income tax credit and fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 22, 537–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. (1974). A theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), 511–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrand, M., Kamenica, E., & Pan, J. (2013). Gender identity and relative income within households (No. w19023). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  6. Bitler, M. P., Gelbach, J. B., Hoynes, H. W., & Zavodny, M. (2004). The impact of welfare reform on marriage and divorce. Demography, 41(2), 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bumpass, L., & Lu, H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54(1), 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahl, G. B., & Lochner, L. (2012). The impact of family income on child achievement. American Economic Review, 102(5), 1927–1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeLeire, T., & Kalil, A. (2005). How do cohabiting couples with children spend their money?. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(2), 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickert-Conlin, S., & Houser, S. (2002). EITC and marriage. National Tax Journal, 55, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edin, K. (2000). What do low-income single mothers say about marriage?. Social Problems, 47(1), 112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Eissa, N., & Hoynes, H. W. (2000). Tax and transfer policy, and family formation: Marriage and cohabitation. MimeoGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellwood, D. (2000). The impact of the earned income tax credit and social policy reforms on work, marriage, and living arrangements. National Tax Journal, 54(4), 1063–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans, W. N., & Garthwaite, C. L. (2010). Giving mom a break: The impact of higher EITC payments on maternal health. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper: 16296.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, H. (2013). The effect of marriage tax penalties and subsidies on marital status. Fiscal Studies, 34(4), 437–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grogger, J., & Bronars, S. G. (2001). The effect of welfare payments on the marriage and fertility behavior of unwed mothers: Results from a twin experiment. Journal of Political Economy, 109(3), 529–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herbst, C. M. (2011). The impact of the earned income tax credit on marriage and divorce: Evidence from flow data. Population Research Policy Review, 30(1), 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Internal Revenue Service. (2013). Qualifying child rules. http://www.irs.gov/Individuals/Qualifying-Child-Rules. Accessed 12 February 2013
  20. Kearney, M. S., & Turner, L. J. (2013). Giving secondary earners a tax break: A proposal to help low- and middle-income families. The Hamilton Project Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
  21. Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. (2011). Cohabitation and trends in the structure and stability of children’s family lives. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. Kenney, C. (2004). Cohabiting couple, filing jointly? Resource pooling and U.S. poverty policies. Family Relations, 53, 237–247.Google Scholar
  23. Lichter, D. T., Qian, Z., & Mellott, L. M. (2006). Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women. Demography, 43(2), 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer, B., & Rosenbaum, D. T. (2001). Welfare, the earned income tax credit, and the labor supply of single mothers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3), 1063–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moffitt, R. A. (1998). The effect of welfare on marriage and fertility. In: Robert A. Moffitt (Ed.), Welfare, the family, and reproductive behavior: Research perspectives (p. 50). Washington DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  26. Oropesa, R. S., Landale, N. S., & Kenkre, T. (2003). Income allocation in marital and cohabiting unions: The case of mainland Puerto Ricans. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(4), 910–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Porter, M. (2005). Everything’s there except money: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 680–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tach, Laura, & Halpern-Meekin, Sarah (2013). Tax code knowledge and behavioral responses among EITC recipients: Policy insights from qualitative data. Journal of Policy Analysis and Mangement, 33(2), 413–439.Google Scholar
  29. Tax Policy Center. (2011). EITC, TANF, and food stamp participation rates, 1990–2004. Taxpolicycenter.org. http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=273. Accessed 30 April 2011, http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=36 Historical EITC parameters. Accessed 30 April 2011

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Administration and International AffairsSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options