Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 393–420 | Cite as

Parental altruism and nest leaving in Europe: evidence from a retrospective survey

  • Viola Angelini
  • Anne Laferrère
Article

Abstract

We use retrospective life-history data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe to assess parental altruism through the effect of parental resources and home characteristics on the age at which individuals now aged 50 or more left the nest in 13 countries. We show that the nest leaving age has declined from one cohort to the next and that the tendency has been of a relative decline in leaving one’s parents to start a family and an increase in leaving home to pursue higher education, even if the first pattern was still the most common for the baby-boomers. We test an altruistic model where constrained parents push the child out, where less constrained “proximity altruistic” parents can help the child by providing a home or even, for the richest “active altruists”, help the child leave the nest. Taking into account the endogenous child’s choices of education, we find that most parents helped by being proximity altruists, while some helped their children move out and that the quality of the home had an important influence on the nest leaving age.

Keywords

Nest leaving Altruism Life-history data 

JEL Classification

D64 J12 R21 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. This paper uses data from SHARELIFE release 1, as of November 24th 2010 or SHARE release 2.4.0, as of March 17th 2010. The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through the 5th framework programme (project QLK6-CT-2001-00360 in the thematic programme Quality of Life), through the 6th framework programme (projects SHARE-I3, RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE, CIT5-CT-2005-028857, and SHARELIFE, CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and through the 7th framework programme (SHARE-PREP, 211909 and SHARE-LEAP, 227822). Additional funding from the U.S. National Institute on Aging (U01 AG09740-13S2, P01 AG005842, P01 AG08291, P30 AG12815, Y1-AG-4553-01 and OGHA 04-064, IAG BSR06-11, R21 AG025169) as well as from various national sources is gratefully acknowledged (see www.share-project.org for a full list of funding institutions).

References

  1. Aassve, A., Billari, F. C., & Piccarreta, R. (2007). Strings of adulthood: A sequence analysis of young British women’s work-family trajectories. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 23, 369–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aassve, A., Burgess, S., Chesher, A., & Propper, C. (2002). Transition from home to marriage of young Americans. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alessie, R., Brugiavini, A., & Weber, G. (2006). Saving and cohabitation: the economic consequences of living with one’s parents in Italy and The Netherlands. In R. H. Clarida, J. A. Frankel, F. Giavazzi, & K. D. West (Eds.), NBER international seminar on macroeconomics 2004 (pp. 413–441). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Angelini, V., Laferrère, A., & Pasini, G. (2011). Nest leaving in Europe. In A. Börsch-Supan, M. Brandt, K. Hank, & M. Schröder (Eds.), The individual and the welfare state, life histories in Europe (pp. 67–97). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avery, R., Goldscheider, E., & Speare, A. (1992). Feathered nest/gilded cage: Parental income and leaving home in the transition to adulthood. Demography, 29, 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnet-Verzat, C., & Wolff, F.-C. (2002). Motives for pocket money allowance and family incentives. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, G. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, S., Bentolila, S., Fernandes, A., & Ichino, A. (2010). Youth emancipation and perceived job insecurity of parents and children. Journal of Population Economics, 23, 1047–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Billari, F., & Tabellini, G. (2010). Italians are late: Does it matter? In J. B. Shoven (Ed.), Demography and the economy, NBER Books (pp. 371–412). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Börsch-Supan, A. (1986). Household formation, housing prices, and public policy impacts. Journal of Public Economics, 30, 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Case, A., & Paxson, C. (2009). Early life health and cognitive function in old age. American Economic Review, 99, 104–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiuri, M. C., & Del Boca, D. (2010a). Household membership decisions of adult children: exploring European diversity. Labour, 24(Special Issue), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiuri, M. C., & Del Boca, D. (2010b). Home-leaving decisions of daughters and sons. Review of Economics of the Household, 8, 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox, D. (1987). Motives for private income transfers. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 508–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Regt, A. (2004). Children in the 20th-century family economy: From co-providers to consumers. History of the Family, 9, 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diaz, A., & Guilló, D. (2005). Family ties and labor supply. Investigaciones Economicas, 29, 289–329.Google Scholar
  17. Duranton, G., Rodríguez-Poseand, A., & Sandall, R. (2008). Family types and the persistence of regional disparities in Europe. Spatial Economic Research Centre, WP, 9.Google Scholar
  18. Elzinga, C. H., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2007). De-standardization of family-life trajectories of young adults: A cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 23, 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Engers, M., & Stern, S. (2002). Long-term care and family bargaining. International Economic Review, 43, 73–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ermisch, J. (1999). Prices, parents, and young people’s household formation. Journal of Urban Economics, 45, 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ermisch, J. (2003). An economic analysis of the family. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ermisch, J., & Di Salvo, P. (1997). The economic determinants of household formation. Economica, 64, 627–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fogli, A. (2004). Endogenous labor market rigidities and family ties. Mimeo, New York University.Google Scholar
  24. Galasso, V., & Profeta, P. (2011). When the state mirrors the family: the design of pension systems. Working paper no. 392, IGIER Università Bocconi.Google Scholar
  25. Ganzeboom, H. B. G., De Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21, 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garrouste, C. (2010). 100 years of educational reforms in Europe: A contextual database. European Commission, JRC Scientific and Technical Reports.Google Scholar
  27. Haurin, R., Hendershott, P., & Kim, D. (1992). The impact of real wages and rents on household formation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 284–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kulis, S. (1992). Social class and the locus of reciprocity in relationships with adult children. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 482–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laferrère, A. (2005a). Leaving the nest: The interaction of parental income and family environment. INSEE WP 2005-01.Google Scholar
  30. Laferrère, A. (2005b). Quitter le nid: entre forces centripètes et centrifuges. Économie et Statistique, 381–382, 147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laferrère, A., & le Blanc, D. (2004). Gone with the windfall: How do housing allowances affect student co-residence? CESifo Economic Studies, 50, 451–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. le Blanc, D., & Wolff, F.-C. (2005). Leaving home in Europe: The role of parents’ and children’s incomes. Review of Economics of the Household, 4, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lesnard, L., Cousteaux, A.-S., Chanvril, F., & Le Hay, V. (2010). Do transitions to adulthood converge in Europe? An optimal matching analysis of work-family trajectories of young adults from 20 European countries. Notes et documents 2010-04, Paris, OSC, Sciences Po/CNRS.Google Scholar
  34. Manacorda, M., & Moretti, E. (2006). Why do most Italian youths live with their parents? Intergenerational transfers and household structure. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 800–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martins, N., & Villanueva, E. (2009). Does high cost of mortgage debt explain why young adults live with their parents? Journal of the European Economic Association, 7, 974–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McElroy, M. (1985). The joint determination of household membership and market work: The case of young men. Journal of Labor Economics, 3, 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nelson, J. (1988). Household economics of scale in consumption: Theory and evidence. Econometrica, 56, 1301–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nilsson, K., & Strandh, M. (1999). Nest leaving in Sweden, the importance of early educational and labor market careers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 1068–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pezzin, L. E., Pollak, R. A., & Schone, B. S. (2007). Efficiency in family bargaining: Living arrangements and caregiving decisions of adult children and disabled elderly parents. CESifo Economic Studies, 53, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pezzin, L. E., Pollak, R. A., & Schone, B. S. (2009). Long-term care of the disabled elderly: Do children increase caregiving by spouses? Review of Economics of the Household, 7, 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosenzweig, M., & Wolpin, K. (1993). Intergenerational support and the life-cycle incomes of young men and their parents: Human capital investments, coresidence, and intergenerational financial transfers. Journal of Labor Economics, 11, 84–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.NetsparTilburgThe Netherlands
  3. 3.INSEEParisFrance
  4. 4.CRESTParisFrance

Personalised recommendations