Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 259–283 | Cite as

Superstition effects versus cohort effects: is it bad luck to be born in the year of the fire horse in Japan?

  • Hiroyuki Yamada
Article

Abstract

The year of the fire horse (called “Hinoeuma” in Japanese) is one of the sixty Chinese zodiac symbols used to count years. According to superstition, fire horse women are said to have troubled marriages, to mistreat men, and to cause early deaths for their husbands and fathers. No such stigma applies to men born in these years. This paper attempts to investigate the impact of women’s birth in the most recent fire horse year (1966) on the outcome of their lives by using individual-level microdata. We find that there is no evidence of disadvantages to fire horse women in human capital investment, performance in the marriage market, or intra-household allocation of resources after marriage. We provide two plausible explanations for this lack of impact from the stigma: a cohort size effect and a dynamic transition in the share of arranged and love marriages. The latter affected parents’ decisions in 1966 as well as the performance of fire horse women in the marriage market and in intra-household resource allocation after marriage. This finding suggests the importance of careful attention to the dynamic effects of society and the economy that may occur before the emergence of a cohort size effect.

Keywords

Superstition Cohort Fire horse Marriage 

JEL Classification

I31 J11 J12 J16 N35 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Japanese Panel Survey of Consumers (JPSC) is a project of The Institute for Research on Household Economics. I would like to thank the institute for permission to use the data. I would like to thank Chris Rohlfs, Kazuo Yamaguchi, Yasuyuki Sawada, Keita Suga, and Alexander Reed for helpful comments and suggestions. All errors remain my own.

References

  1. Akabayashi, H. (2007). Lives of Hinoeuma (Fiery Horse) generation: Evidence from the statistics. The Japanese Journal of Labour Studies.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, S. (2007). Why the marriage squeeze cannot cause dowry inflation. Journal of Economic Theory, 137, 140–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angrist, J. (2002). How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor market? Evidence from American’s second generation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 997–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azumi, K. (1968). The mysterious drop in Japan’s birth rate. Trans-Action, 5(6), 46–48.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, S. G. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, S. G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Behrman, J., & Rosenzweig, M. (2002). Does increasing women’s schooling raise the schooling of the next generation? American Economic Review, 92(1), 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caldwell, C. J., Reddy, P. H., & Caldwell, P. (1983). The causes of marriage change in South India. Population Studies, 37(November), 343–361.Google Scholar
  9. Chiappori, P., Fortin, B., & Lacroix, G. (2002). Marriage market, divorce legislation, and household labor supply. Journal of Political Economy, 110(1), 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cho, S. (2002, January 1). Horse year panic. Korea Herald, Seoul.Google Scholar
  11. Choo, E., & Siow, A. (2006). Who marries whom and why. Journal of Political Economy, 114(1), 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cortese, J. (2004). Onna No Hinoeuma: What it means to be a fire horse woman. Available at: http://www.io.com/~cortese/hinoeuma/index.html.
  13. Edlund, L. (1999). Son preference, sex ratios, and marriage patterns. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), 1275–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edlund, L., Li, H., Yi, J., & Zhang, J. (2007). Sex ratios and crime: Evidence from China’s one-child policy. IZA discussion paper no. 3214.Google Scholar
  15. Francis, M. A. (2011). Sex ratios and the red dragon: Using the Chinese communist revolution to explore the effect of the sex ratio on women and children in Taiwan. Journal of Population Economics, 24(3), 813–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grossbard-Shechtman, A. S. (1984). A theory of allocation of time in markets for labor and marriage. Economic Journal, 94(4), 863–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grossbard-Shechtman, A. S. (1993). On the economics of marriage. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hashimoto, M. (1974). Economics of postwar fertility in Japan: Differentials and trends. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), S170–S194 (Part 2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heer, M. D., & Grossbard-Shechtman, A. S. (1981). The impact of the female marriage squeeze and the contraceptive revolution on sex roles and the women’s liberation movement in the United States, 1960 to 1975. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43(1), 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houston, J. W. (2003). The legend of fire horse woman. New York: Kensington Books.Google Scholar
  21. Institute for Research on Household Economics. Japanese Panel Survey of Consumers (1993–2000).Google Scholar
  22. Itoh, T., & Bando, R. (1987). Fertility change of the year of Hinoe-uma. Jinko Mondai Kenkyu, 181, 31–43.Google Scholar
  23. Japan. Statistics Bureau, Director-General for Policy Planning and Statistical Research and Training Institute. http://www.stat.go.jp/english/index.htm.
  24. Kaku, K. (1972). Are physicians sympathetic to superstition? A study of Hinoe-Uma. Social Biology, 19(1), 60–64.Google Scholar
  25. Kaku, K., & Matsumoto, Y. S. (1975). Influence of a folk superstition on fertility of Japanese in California and Hawaii, 1966. American Journal of Public Health, 65(2), 170–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, T. (1997). The effects of sex-selective abortion on fertility level in Korea. Korea Journal of Population and Development, 26(1), 43–60.Google Scholar
  27. Kurosu, S. (1994). Sex ratios and the years of the fire horse (Hinoeuma): Cultural and regional experiences in Japan. In A. Faune-Chamoux & S. Sgaer (Eds.), Socio-economic consequences of sex-ratios in historical perspective. Milan: University of Bocconi.Google Scholar
  28. Lebra, T. S. (1978). Japanese women and marital strain. Ethos, 6(1), 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, J. (2005). Marriage, female labor supply, and Asian zodiacs. Economic Letters, 87(3), 427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, J., & Paik, M. (2006). Sex preferences and fertility in South Korea during the year of the horse. Demography, 43(2), 262–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. The national survey on marriage and childbirth. Available at http://www.ipss.go.jp/ps-doukou/j/doukou12/doukou12.htmL.
  32. Park, C. B., & Cho, N. (1994). Gender preference and sex imbalance in the population and their implications in Korea. Journal of the Population Association of Korea, 17(1), 87–114.Google Scholar
  33. Rao, V. (1993). The rising price of husbands: A hedonic analysis of dowry increases in rural India. Journal of Political Economy, 101(4), 666–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rolhfs, C., Reed, A., & Yamada, H. (2010). Causal effects of sex preference on sex-blind and sex-selective child avoidance and substitution across birth years: Evidence from the Japanese year of the fire horse. Journal of Development Economics, 92(1), 82–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wong, K., & Yung, L. (2005). Do dragons have better fate? Economic Inquiry, 43(3), 689–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Osaka School of International Public PolicyOsaka UniversityToyonakaJapan

Personalised recommendations