Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 77–97 | Cite as

I would if I could: precarious employment and childbearing intentions in Italy

  • Francesca Modena
  • Fabio SabatiniEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper carries out an investigation into the socio-economic determinants of childbearing decisions made by couples in Italy. The analysis accounts for the characteristics of both possible parents. Our results do not support established theoretical predictions according to which the increase in the opportunity cost of motherhood connected to higher female labour participation is responsible for the fall in fertility. On the contrary, the instability of women’s work status (i.e. having occasional, precarious, and low-paid positions) is revealed as a significant dissuasive factor in the decision to have children. Couples in which there is an unemployed woman are less likely to plan childbearing as well. Other relevant explanatory variables are women’s age, men’s work status and education, women’s citizenship, marital status and perceived economic well-being.

Keywords

Fertility Family planning Parenthood Childbearing Participation Job instability Precarious employment Italy 

JEL Classification

C25 J13 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Christopher Gilbert, Alessandra Gualtieri and two anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions. Francesca Modena gratefully acknowledges the financial support of Fondazione Caritro. Needless to say, usual disclaimers apply.

References

  1. Adsera, A. (2004). Changing fertility rates in developed countries. The impact of labor market institutions. Journal of Population Economics, 17, 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adsera, A. (2006). An economic analysis of the gap between desired and actual fertility: The case of Spain. Review of Economics of the Household, 4, 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahn, N., & Mira, P. (2002). A note on the relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries. Journal of Population Economics, 15, 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amudeo-Dorantes, C., & Serrano-Padial, R. (2010). Labor market flexibility and poverty dynamics. Labour Economics, 17, 632–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bank of Italy. (2009). Relazione annuale sul 2008. Rome: Bank of Italy.Google Scholar
  6. Barbieri, P., & Scherer, S. (2005). Le conseguenze sociali della flessibilizzazione del mercato del lavoro in Italia. Stato e Mercato, 74, 291–321.Google Scholar
  7. Barbieri, P., & Scherer, S. (2009). Labour Market Flexibilization and its Consequences in Italy. European Sociological Review, 25(6), 677–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, G. (1981). A Treatise on the family. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Benach, J., Benavides, F. J., Platt, S., Diez-Roux, A., & Muntaner, C. (2000). The health-damaging potential of new types of flexible employment: A challenge for public health researchers. American Journal of Public Health, 90(8), 1316–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernhardt, E. M. (1993). Fertility and employment. European Sociological Review, 9, 25–42.Google Scholar
  11. Bettio, F., & Villa, P. (1998). A Mediterranean perspective on the break-down of the relationship between participation and fertility. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(2), 137–171.Google Scholar
  12. Billari, F. C., & Kohler, H.-P. (2004). Patterns of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe. Population Studies, 58, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Booth, A. L., Francesconi, M., & Frank, J. (2002). Temporary jobs: Stepping stones or dead ends? The Economic Journal, 112, F189–F213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brandolini, A., Casadio, P., Cipollone, P., Magnani, M., Rosolia, A., & Torrini, R. (2007). Employment growth in Italy in the 1990 s: Institutional arrangements and market forces. In N. Acocella & R. Leoni (Eds.), Social pacts, employment and growth (pp. 31–68). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Castiglioni, M., & Della Zuanna, G. (2009). Marital and reproductive behavior in Italy after 1995: Bridging the gap with Western Europe? European Journal of Population, 25, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chesnais, J.-C. (1996). Fertility, family, and social policy in contemporary Western Europe. Population and Development Review, 22(4), 729–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cigno, A. (1991). Economics of the family. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cipollone, P. (2001). Is the Italian labour market segmented? Bank of Italy, Temi di discussione 400.Google Scholar
  19. Coleman, D. (2006). Immigration and ethnic change in low-fertility countries: A third demographic transition. Population And Development Review, 32(3), 401–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coleman, D. (2009). Divergent patterns in the ethnic transformation of societies. Population and Development Review, 35(3), 449–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooke, L. P. (2009). Gender equity and fertility in Italy and Spain. Journal of Social Policy, 38(1), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. D’Addio, A. C., D’Ercole, M. M. (2005). Trends and determinants of fertility rates: The role of policies. OECD Social Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 27, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. D’Addio, A. C., & Rosholm, M. (2005). Exits from temporary jobs in Europe: A competing risks analysis. Labour Economics, 12, 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dagenais, M. G. (1999). Inconsistency of a proposed nonlinear instrumental variables estimator for probit and logit models with endogenous regressors. Economics Letters, 63, 19–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Del Boca, D., Pasqua, S., & Pronzato, C. (2009). Motherhood and market work decisions in institutional context: A European perspective. Oxford Economic Papers, 61, 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Del Boca, D., & Sauer, R. M. (2009). Life cycle employment and fertility across institutional environments. European Economic Review, 53, 274–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Del Bono, E., Weber, A., Winter-Ebmer, R. (2008). Clash of career and family: fertility decisions after job displacement. CEPR Discussion Paper 6719.Google Scholar
  28. Dolado, J. J., Garcìa-Serrano, C., & Jimeno, J. F. (2002). Drawing lessons from the boom of temporary jobs in Spain. The Economic Journal, 112, F270–F295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Engelhardt, H., & Prskawetz, A. (2004). On the changing correlation between fertility and female employment over space and time. European Journal of Population, 20, 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feld, S. (2000). Active population growth and immigration hypotheses in Western Europe. European Journal of Population, 16, 3–40.Google Scholar
  31. Ferrera, M. (2005). The boundaries of welfare. European integration and the new spatial politics of social protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ferrera, M., & Gualmini, E. (2004). Rescued by Europe? Social and labour market reforms from Maastricht to Berlusconi. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gauthier, A. H. (1996). The state and the family: A comparative analysis of family policies in industrialized countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Guadalupe, M. (2003). The hidden costs of fixed term contracts: the impact on work accidents. Labour Economics, 10, 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  36. Hopcroft, R. L. (2005). Parental status and differential investment in sons and daughters: Trivers-Willard revisited. Social Forces, 83(3), 1111–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hopcroft, R. L. (2006). Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hopcroft, R. L., & Whitmeyer, J. M. (2010). A choice model of occupational status and fertility. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 34(4), 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Istat. (2001). Struttura demografica e familiare della popolazione residente. 14° Censimento generale della popolazione 2001. Roma: Istat.Google Scholar
  40. Istat. (2007). Essere madri in Italia. Indagine campionaria sulle nascite 2005. Roma: Istat.Google Scholar
  41. Istat. (2010). Indicatori demografici 2009. Roma: Istat.Google Scholar
  42. Kanazawa, S. (2003). Can evolutionary psychology explain reproductive behavior in the contemporary United States? Sociological Quarterly, 44, 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kim, M.-H., Kim, C., Park, J.-K., & Kawachi, I. (2008). Is precarious employment damaging to self-rated health? Results of propensity score matching methods, using longitudinal data in South Korea. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 1982–1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kögel, T. (2004). Did the association between fertility and female employment within OECD countries really change its sign? Journal of Population Economics, 17, 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kohler, H.-P., Billari, F. C., & Ortega, J. A. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990 s. Population and Development Review, 28, 641–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lucchetti, R. (2002). Inconsistency of naive GMM estimation for QR models with endogenous regressors. Economics Letters, 75, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Matthews, B. J. (1999). The gender system and fertility: An exploration of hidden links. Canadian Studies in Population, 26(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
  48. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McDonald, P. (2008). Very Low Fertility. Consequences, causes and policy approaches. The Japanese Journal of Population, 6(1), 19–23.Google Scholar
  50. McDonald, P., & Temple, J. (2006). Immigration and the Supply of Complex Problem Solvers in the Australian Economy. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs.Google Scholar
  51. Menendez, M., Benach, J., Muntaner, C., Amable, M., & O’Campo, P. (2007). Is precarious employment more damaging to women’s health than men’s? Social Science and Medicine, 64, 776–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller Torr, B., & Shorr, S. E. (2004). Second births and the second shift: A research note on gender equity and fertility. Population and Development Review, 30(1), 109–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morgan, S. P. (2003). Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis? Demography, 40, 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Perusse, D. (1993). Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: Testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 267–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sabatini, F. (2009). Social capital as social networks: a new framework for measurement and an empirical analysis of its determinants and consequences. Journal of Socio-economics, 38(3), 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Simonazzi, A., Villa, P., Naticchioni, P., & Lucidi, F. (2009). Continuity and change in the Italian model. In G. Bosch, S. Lehndorff, & J. Rubery (Eds.), European employment models in flux. A Comparison of Institutional Change in Nine European Countries (pp. 201–222). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. United Nations Population Division. (2009). UN Population Division Policy Brief March 2009. United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  58. Wilde, J. (2008). A note on GMM estimation of probit models with endogenous regressors. Economics Letters, 49, 471–484.Google Scholar
  59. Willis, R. J. (1973). A New approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of TrentoTrento (TN)Italy
  2. 2.European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises (Euricse)Trento (TN)Italy

Personalised recommendations