Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 393–408

Home-leaving decisions of daughters and sons

Article

Abstract

In spite of relevant differences between countries, a common international pattern emerges: daughters leave parental homes earlier than sons. Drawing upon the European Community Household Panel, we explore the impacts of various factors that affect daughters’ and sons’ home-leaving decisions. Our results show important differences across genders as well as across countries. The decisions of daughters appear to be more responsive than sons’ to family structure as well as to institutional factors such as the labor and the mortgage market.

Keywords

Living arrangements Gender Social policies 

JEL Classification

J2 C3 D1 

References

  1. Aassve, A., Billari, F., Mazzuco, S., & Ongaro, F. (2001). Leaving home ain’t easy. A comparative longitudinal analysis of ECHP data, MPIDR WP. 2001-038.Google Scholar
  2. Aassve, A., Iacovou, M., & Mencarini, L. (2006). Youth poverty and transition to adulthood in Europe. Demographic Research, 15, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, S., Bentolila, S., Fernandes, A., & Ichino, A. (2005). Youth emancipation and perceived job insecurity of parents and children. IZA D.P. 1836.Google Scholar
  4. Billari, F., & Kohler, H. (2004). Patterns of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe. Population Studies, 58(2):161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billari, F., Philipov, D., & Baizán Munoz, P. (2001). Leaving home in Europe: The experience of cohorts born around 1960. MPIDR Working Papers WP-2001-014.Google Scholar
  6. Cammelli, A. (2005). La transizione dall’università al lavoro in Europa, Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  7. Card, D., & Lemieux, T. (2000). Adapting to circumstance: The evolution of work, school and living arrangements among North American Youth. In D. Blanchflower, R. Freeman (Eds.), Youth employment and joblessness in advanced countries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chamberlain, G. (1980). Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Review of Economic Studies, 47, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiuri, M. C., & Del Boca D. (2008). Household membership decisions of adult children. IZA DP 3546.Google Scholar
  10. Chiuri, M. C., & Jappelli, T.(2003). Financial market imperfections and home ownership: a comparative study. European Economic Review 47, 857–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dalla Zuanna, G., & Micheli, G. (Eds.). (2004). Strong family and low fertility: A paradox?. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  12. Davanzo, J. F., & Goldschieder, K. (1990). Coming home again:returns to the parental home of young adults. Populations Studies, 44(2), 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ermisch, J. (1999). Prices, parents and young people’s household formation. Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 1–17.Google Scholar
  14. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giannelli, G., & Monfardini, G. (2003). Joint decisions on household membership and human capital accumulation of youths. The role of expected earnings and local markets. Journal of Population Economics, 16(2), 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grossbard, S., & Amuedo-Dorantes, A. (2007). Cohort-level sex ratio effects on women’s labor force participation. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(3), 249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaplan, G. (2009). Moving back home:insurance against labor market risk mimeo NYU.Google Scholar
  18. Le Blanc, D., & Wolff, C. (2006). Leaving home in Europe: The role of parents’ and children’s incomes. Review of Economics of the Household, (4), 53–73.Google Scholar
  19. Maclennan, D., Muellbauer, J., & Stephens, M. (1998). Asymmetries in housing and financial market institutions and EMU. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(3), 54–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martins, N., & Villanueva, E. (2006). Does limited access to mortgage debt explain why young adults live with their parents? Working Papers 0628, Banco de Espana.Google Scholar
  21. McElroy, M. (1985). The joint determination of household membership and market work: The case of young men. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(3), 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicoletti, C., & Peracchi, F. (2005). Survey response and survey characteristics: Microlevel evidence from the European Community Household Panel. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, 168(4), 763–781.Google Scholar
  23. Parisi, L. (2008). Leaving home and the chances of being poor: The case of young people in Southern European countries. Labour, 22(Special Issue), 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reher, D. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenzweig, M., & Wolpin, K. (1993). Intergenerational support and the life-cycle incomes of young men and their parents: Human capital investments, coresidence, and intergenerational financial transfers. Journal of Labor Economics, 11(1), 84–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosina, A. (2004). Family formation and fertility in Italy. In G. Dalla Zuanna, G. A. Micheli (Eds.), Strong family and low fertility: A paradox? London: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Bari and CHILDBariItaly
  2. 2.Collegio Carlo AlbertoUniversity of Turin and CHILDTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations