The potential of a couples approach to employment assistance: results of a nonexperimental evaluation
- First Online:
We present findings from a nonexperimental evaluation of an employment program in which both partners in young, low-income, primarily African-American couples simultaneously participated. Mothers participating in the couples program had larger immediate gains in employment and earnings and decreases in TANF receipt following their exit from the program relative to mothers who received employment assistance as individuals. Fathers showed similar although weaker results. These immediate benefits appeared to be driven by higher rates of program completion among couples’ participants. Couples in which both partners completed the program experienced the largest quarterly earnings gains, and couples with greater earnings’ gains were more likely to still be together one year after the program ended. Mothers’ earnings gains eroded in the two years following program completion and many reported new pregnancies and problems with child care. We suggest directions for future programs and encourage future studies to consider the range of mechanisms associated with a couples focus, including potential motivational benefits and unintended consequences.
KeywordsEmployment assistance Low-income youth Couples Parents
JEL ClassificationJ24 J22 J12
- Bardasi, E., & Taylor, M. (2008). Marriage and wages: A test of the specialization hypothesis. Economics, 75, 569–591.Google Scholar
- Bzostek, S. H., Carlson, M. J., & McLanahan, S. S. (2006). Does mother know best? A comparison of biological and social fathers after a nonmarital birth. Center for Research on Child Wellbeing WP06-27-FF. http://crcw.princeton.edu/workingpapers/WP06-27-FF.pdf.
- Dion, M. R., Avellar, S. A., Zaveri, H. H., & Hershey, A. M. (2006). Implementing healthy marriage programs for unmarried couples with children: Early lessons from the building strong families project. Washington, DC: Mathematic Policy Research Inc.Google Scholar
- Grossbard-Shechtman, S. (1993). On the economics of marriage: A theory of marriage, labor, and divorce. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Heinrich, C. J., Mueser, P., & Troske, K. (2008). Workforce investment act non-experimental net impact evaluation. Final report to U.S. Department of Labor, December.Google Scholar
- Hersch, J. (2009). Home production and wages: Evidence from the American time use survey. Review of Economics of the Household. doi:10.1007/s11150-009-9051-z.
- LaLonde, R. J. (1995). The promise of public sector-sponsored training programs. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 149–168.Google Scholar
- Lerman, R., Acs, G., & Bir, A. (2007). An economic framework, selected proposal for demonstrations aimed at strengthening marriage, employment, family functioning outcomes. Report prepared for the Administration for Children, Families, U.S. Department of Health, Human Services. Lincoln, A.E. (2008). Gender, productivity, and the marital wage premium. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70, 806–814.Google Scholar
- National Healthy Marriage Resource Center. (2008). Marriage, employment and family economic security: Research, program and policy implications. Conference held at the Johnson Foundation Wingspread Conference Center, June 9–11, 2008.Google Scholar
- Ooms, T., Bouchet, S., & Parke, M. (2004). Beyond marriage licenses: Efforts in states to strengthen marriage and two-parent families. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.Google Scholar
- Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., & Jenkins, N. H. (2003). Marriage education and government policy: Helping couples who choose marriage achieve success. Denver, CO: University of Denver.Google Scholar
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2004). Consumer price index––all urban consumers (U.S. City Average, All Items). Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://data.bls.gov/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2008). Healthy marriage initiative. Retrieved January 14, 2008, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/healthymarriage/.
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar