Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 1–28 | Cite as

Does housework matter anymore? The shifting impact of housework on economic inequality

  • Cathleen D. ZickEmail author
  • W. Keith Bryant
  • Sivithee Srisukhumbowornchai
Article

Abstract

In recent years, American women’s housework time has declined while American men’s housework time has risen. We examine how these changes have affected economic inequality in the United States. Using time-diary data from the Time Use in Economic and Social Accounts, 1975–1976 (N = 1,484) and the American Time Use Survey, 2003 (N = 5,534), we value adults’ housework using two alternative methodologies and assess its influence on households’ real access to goods and services in both years. Results suggest that housework reduces economic inequality in both years. But, between 1975–1976 and 2002–2003, overall economic inequality rose largely because of the growing wage inequality and also, in part, because of growth in housework inequality. Socio-demographic change partially inhibited the overall growth in economic inequality.

Keywords

Economic inequality Housework Time use 

JEL Classifications

D13 D63 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We wish to thank Philip N. Cohen for sharing his SAS code used to compute Gini coefficients.

References

  1. Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2006). Measuring trends in leisure: The allocation of time over five decades, Working Paper No. 06–02, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D. (2002). Technical change, inequality, and the labor market, Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 7–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aslaksen, I., & Koren, C. (1996). Unpaid household work and the distribution of extended income: The Norwegian experience. Feminist Economics, 2, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Bonke, J. (1992). Distribution of economic resources: Implications of including household production. Review of Income and Wealth, 38, 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonke, J., Gupta, N. D., & Smith, N. (2005). The timing and flexibility of housework and men and women’s wages. In D. S. Hamermesh & G. A. Pfann (Eds.) The economics of time use. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  8. Bryant, W. K. (1986). Technical change and the family: An initial foray. In R. E. Deacon, & W. E. Huffman (Eds.) Human Resources Research, 1887–1987: Proceedings, Ames, IA: College of Home Economics, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
  9. Bryant, W. K. (1994). Effects of technical change on American farm families: Fragmentary evidence from the 1920s and 1930s. In K. De Hoog & Van Ophem (Eds.), Changes in daily life: Liber Amicorum Clio Presvelou. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
  10. Bryant, W. K. (1996). A comparison of the household work of married females: The mid 1920s and the late 1960s. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 24, 358–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bryant, W. K., Kang, H., Zick, C. D., & Chan, A. Y. (2004). Measuring housework in time use surveys. Review of Economics of the Household, 2, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryant, W. K., & Zick, C. D. (1985). Income distribution implications of rural household production. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65, 1100–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen D., Piketty T., & Saint-Paul G. (Eds.) (2002). The economics of rising inequalities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Converse P. E., & Robinson, J. P. (1980). Americans’ use of time, 1965–1966. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
  15. Cortes, P. (2005). The effect of low-skilled immigration on US prices: Evidence from CPI Data. Unpublished manuscript available at: http://www.economics.uci.edu/index.php?p=76.
  16. Day, J. C., Janus, A., & Davis, J. (2005). Computer and internet use in the United States: 2003. Current Population Reports, P23–P208.Google Scholar
  17. Frazis, H. & Stewart, J. (2006). How does household production affect earnings inequality? Evidence from the American time use survey. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Working Paper 393. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/ore/abstract/ec/ec060050.htm.
  18. Garfinkel, I., Rainwater, L., & Smeeding, T. M. (2006). A reexammination of welfare state and insquality in rich nations: How inkind transfers and indirect taxes change the story. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(4), 897–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glantz, S. A., & Slinker, B. K. (1990). Primer of applied regression and analysis of variance. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Gottschalk, P., & Mayer, S. E. (2002). Changes in home production, trends in economic inequality. In Cohen, D., Piketty, T. & G. Saint-Paul (Eds.), The new economics of rising inequality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ironmonger, D. (1996). Counting outputs, capital inputs and caring labor: Estimating gross household product. Feminist Economics, 2, 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Inonmonger, D., & Soupourmas, F. (2003). Married households and gross household product. In S. A. Grossbard-Shechtman (Ed.), Marriage and the economy: Theory and evidence from advanced industrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Chapter 13.Google Scholar
  24. Juster, F. T., Courant, P., Duncan, G. J., Robinson, J. P., & Stafford, F. P. (2001). Time use in economic and social accounts, 1975–1976. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
  25. Katz, L. F., & Autor, D. H. (1999). Changes in the wage structure and earnings inequality. In Ashenfelter, O. & Card, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3A, Amsterdam: Elsevier, Chapter 26.Google Scholar
  26. Landefeld, J. S., & McCulla, S. H. (2000). Accounting for nonmarket household production within a national accounts framework. Review of Income and Wealth, 46, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lutzel, H. (1996). Household sector income, consumption, and wealth. In J. W. Kendrick (Ed.) The new system of national accounts. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Reid, M. G. (1934). Economics of household production. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Robinson, J. P. (1985). Validity and reliability of diaries versus alternative time use measures. In F. T. Juster & F. P. Stafford (Eds.), Time, goods, and well-being. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Survey Research Center.Google Scholar
  30. Robinson, J. P., & Bostrom, A. (1994). The overestimated workweek? What time diary measures suggest. Monthly Labor Review, August, 11–23.Google Scholar
  31. Robinson, J. P., & Godbey, G. (1997). Time for life—The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sayer, L. C. (2005). Gender, time and inequality: Trends in women’s and men’s paid work, unpaid work and free time. Social Forces, 81, 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smeeding, T. M. (1982). Alternative methods for valuing selected in-kind transfer benefits and measuring their effect on poverty. U.S. Bureau of Census Technical Paper No. 50. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  34. St. Louis Federal Reserve (2007). Personal Consumption Expenditures: Chain-type Price Index. Available online at: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/PCECTPI.txt.
  35. U.S. Census Bureau (2007). Historical Income Tables—Households, Table H4. Available online at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/histinc/h04.html.
  36. U.S. Bureau of Labor U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2007). American Time Use Survey—2003. Available online at: http://www.bls.gov/tus/home.htm.
  37. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2004). Time use survey—First results announced by BLS. Press Release (reissued January 12, 2005). Available at: http://www.bls.gov/ore/abstract/ec/ec060050.htm.
  38. U.S. Department of Labor (2006). Unemployment Insurance Tax Topic. Available online at: http://workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/unemploy/uitaxtopic.asp.
  39. Warren, J. (1940). Use of time in its relation to home management (Bulletin 734). Ithaca: Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  40. Weisbrod, B. A., & Hansen, W. L. (1968). An income-net worth approach to measuring economic welfare. American Economic Review, 58(5), 1315–1329.Google Scholar
  41. Wiegand, E. (1954). Use of time by full-time and par-time homemakers in relation to home management (Memoir 330). Ithaca: Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  42. Wilson, M. M. (1929). Use of time by oregon farm homemakers (Station Bulletin No. 256). Corvallis: Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State College.Google Scholar
  43. Zick, C. D., & Bryant, W. K. (1990). Shadow wage assessments of the value of home production: Patterns from the 1970s. Lifestyles: Family and Economic Issues, 11, 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cathleen D. Zick
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • W. Keith Bryant
    • 3
  • Sivithee Srisukhumbowornchai
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Family and Consumer StudiesUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Public and International Affairs at the University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.Department of Policy Analysis and ManagementCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Family and Preventive MedicineUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations