Journal of Regulatory Economics

, Volume 56, Issue 2–3, pp 167–187 | Cite as

Extraterritoriality of swaps regulation and regulatory arbitrage

  • Carmela D’AvinoEmail author
Original Paper


In this paper, we investigate how the extraterritorial applicability of the US over-the-counter derivatives regulation impacts the off-balance sheet positions of foreign branches of US banks. While existing research has focused on the effects of the regulation on swap markets’ liquidity, we contribute to the literature by looking at off-balance sheet exposures, focusing on geographically disaggregated data. Swaps exposures are found to increase in those jurisdictions in which limited extraterritoriality applies due to the substitute compliance framework. Furthermore, we find an increase in futures and forwards exposures in foreign branches located in host countries that fully comply with the extraterritoriality. Our results are consistent with a geographical and cross-product regulatory-induced activities reallocation.


US banks Foreign branches Interest rate swaps OTC derivatives regulation 

JEL Classification

F33 G15 G21 



The author would like to thank the editor, Prof. Menahem Spiegel, and two anonymous referees who kindly reviewed the earlier version of this manuscript and provided valuable suggestions and comments.


  1. Acharya, V. V., Wachtel, P., & Walter, I. (2009). International alignment of financial sector regulation. In V. V. Acharya & M. Richardson (Eds.), Restoring financial stability: how to repair a failed system. New Jersey: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artamonov, A. (2015). Cross border application of OTC derivatives rules: revisiting the substituted compliance approach. Journal of Financial Regulation,1(2), 206–225.Google Scholar
  3. Barnier, M. (2013). International cooperation: a sine qua non for the success of OTC derivatives markets reform. Financial Stability Review, Banque de France, April. Retrieved 2 June 2015.
  4. Benos, E., Payne, R., & Vasios, M. (2018). Centralized trading, transparency and interest rate swap market liquidity: evidence from the implementation of the Dodd–Frank Act. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,1–34, 1–76. Scholar
  5. Calomiris, C. (2000). U. S. bank deregulation in historical perspective. Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carbo-Valverde, S., Kane, E., & Rodriguez-Fernandez, F. (2012). Evidence of regulatory arbitrage in cross border mergers of banks in the EU. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,44(8), 1609–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Celent, (2013). The Asian OTC derivatives markets. Retrieved 15 July 2018.
  8. Cerutti, E., D.’Ariccia, G., & Martinez Peria, M. S. (2007). How banks go abroad: branches or subsidiaries? Journal of Banking & Finance,31, 1669–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cetorelli, N., & Goldberg, L. (2012). Banking globalization and monetary policy transmission. Journal of Finance,67, 1811–1843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, CFTC, (2013). Interpretive guidance and policy statement regarding compliance with certain swap. Federal Register. Retrieved 23 May 2014.
  11. Dallara, C.H. (2013). Containing extraterritoriality to promote financial stability. Financial Stability Review, Banque de France, April. Retrieved 2 June 2015.
  12. D’Avino, C. (2017). Banking regulation and the changing geography of off-balance sheet activities. Economics Letters,157, 155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. D’Avino, C. (2018). Quantitative easing, global banks and the international bank lending channel. Economic Modelling,71(C), 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Haas, R., & van Lelyveld, I. (2010). Internal capital markets and lending by multinational bank subsidiaries. Journal of Financial Intermediation,19, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fiechter, J., Ötker-Robe, İ., Ilyina, A., Hsu, M., Santos, A., & Surti, J. (2011). Subsidiaries or branches: Does one size fit all?. IMF Staff Discussion Note No. 11/14. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 3 July 2017.
  16. Financial Stability Board (2014). OTC derivatives market reforms: Eight progress report on implementation. Retrieved 5 July 2016.
  17. Gart, A. (1994). Regulation, deregulation, reregulation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Giancarlo, J.C. (2015). Pro-reform reconsideration of the CFTC swaps trading rules: Return to Dodd-Frank. CFTC, White Paper. Retrieved 17 Aug 2016.
  19. Greene, E. F., & Pothia, I. (2012). Examining the extraterritorial reach of Dodd–Frank’s Volcker Rule and margin rules for uncleared swaps—a call for regulatory coordination and cooperation. Capital Markets Law Journal,7(3), 271–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hogan, T. L., & Burns, S. (2019). The impact of Dodd–Frank on banks’ noninterest expenses. Journal of Regulatory Economics,55(2), 214–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Houston, J. F., Chen, L., & Yue, M. (2012). Regulatory arbitrage and international bank flows. Journal of Finance,67, 1845–1895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Howell, E. J. (2015). Substitute compliance: the emergence, challenges, and evolution of a new regulatory paradigm. Journal of Financial Regulation,1(2), 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hubbard, R. G. (1994). Money, the Financial System, and the Economy. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  24. International Swaps and Derivatives Association, ISDA, (2014). Cross border fragmentation of global OTC derivatives: An empirical analysis. Research Note. Retrieved 22 June 2016.
  25. Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Papaioannou, E., & Perri, F. (2013). Global banks and crisis transmission. Journal of International Economics,82(2), 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karolyi, G. A., & Taboada, A. G. (2015). Regulatory arbitrage and cross-border bank acquisitions. Journal of Finance,70, 2395–2450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Loon, Y. C., & Zhong, Z. K. (2016). Does Dodd–Frank affect OTC transaction costs and liquidity? Evidence from real-time CDS trade reports. Journal of Financial Economics,119(3), 645–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance,7, 77–91.Google Scholar
  29. McDonald, R., & Paulson, A. (2015). AIG in hindsight. Journal of Economic Perspectives,29(2), 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Patrone, R. J. (2016). Linking past and present: assessing the stability of post-Title VII derivatives markets. NYU Journal of Law & Business,12(2), 459–509.Google Scholar
  31. Rosenberg, G. D., & Massari, J. R. (2013). Regulation through substitution as policy tool: swap futurization under Dodd-Frank. Columbia Law Review. Scholar
  32. Wooldridge, J. (2009). New developments in econometrics: lecture 11: difference-indifferences estimation. Cemmap lectures; UCL, 2009. Retrieved 24 Feb 2018.
  33. Yadav, Y., & Turing, J. D. (2016). The extraterritorial regulation of clearinghouses. Journal of Financial Regulation,2, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICN Business SchoolNancyFrance
  2. 2.CEREFIGEUniversité de LorraineNancyFrance

Personalised recommendations