Substitution between fixed-line and mobile access: the role of complementarities
- 324 Downloads
We study substitution from fixed-line to mobile voice access, and the role of various complementarities that may slow down this process. We use survey data of 160,363 households from 27 EU countries during 2005–2011. We estimate a discrete choice model where households may choose one or both voice technologies, possibly in combination with internet access. We obtain the following main findings. First, there is significant fixed-to-mobile substitution, especially in recent years: without mobile telephony, fixed-line penetration would have been 14.1 % higher at the end of 2011. But there is substantial heterogeneity across households and EU regions, with a stronger substitution in Central and Eastern European countries. Second, the decline in fixed telephony has been slowed down because of a significant complementarity between the fixed-line and mobile connections offered by the fixed-line incumbent operator. This gives the incumbent a possibility to protect its position in the fixed-line market, raising market share by 2.7 %, and to leverage it into the mobile market, raising market share by 5.4 % points. Third, the decline in fixed telephony has also been slowed down because of the complementarity with broadband internet: the introduction of DSL avoided an additional decline in fixed-line penetration of 8.7 % points at the end of 2011. The emergence of fixed broadband has thus been the main source through which incumbents maintain their strong position in the fixed-line network.
KeywordsFixed-to-mobile substitution Incumbency advantage Broadband access
JEL ClassificationL13 L43 L96
Financial support from the NET Institute, www.NETinst.org is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Marc Bourreau, Yutec Sun, Steffen Hoerning, Joao Vareda and participants at the 2014 ICT Conference at Telecom ParisTech, 2014 FSR C&M scientific seminar at the Florence School of Regulation, 12th Annual IIOC Conference in Chicago and 2014 CRESSE Conference in Korfu for helpful comments. All errors are our own.
- Bourreau, M., Cambini, C., & Hoernig, S. (2014). Fixed-mobile substitution and termination rates, Mimeo.Google Scholar
- Eurobarometer, (2011). E-communications household survey: Fieldwork February–March 2011, available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/inde_en.htm
- European Regulators Group. (2009). Report on fixed-mobile convergence: implications on competition and regulatory aspects. ERG, 09, 06.Google Scholar
- García-Marinoso, B., & Suarez, D. (2013). Which are the drivers of fixed to mobile telephone access substitution? An empirical study of the Spanish residential market. Telecommunications Policy, 37(4–5), 282–291.Google Scholar
- Grzybowski, L., Nitsche, R., Verboven, F., & Wiethaus, L. (2014). Market definition for broadband internet in Slovakia—are fixed and mobile technologies in the same market? Information Economics and Policy, 28, 39–56.Google Scholar
- Hausman, J. (1996). Valuation of new goods under perfect and imperfect competition. In T. Bresnahan & R. Gordon (Eds.), The economics of new goods, NBER studies in income and wealth (Vol. 58, pp. 209–237). Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Macher, J.T., Mayo, J.W., Ukhaneva, O. & Woroch, G. (2015). Demand in a portfolio-choice environment: The evolution of telecommunications, Georgetown University Working Paper pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
- Miravete, E. J., & Pernías, J. C. (2010). Testing for complementarity when strategies are dichotomous. Economics Letters, 106(1), 28–31.Google Scholar
- New Zealand Commerce Commission. (2003). Review of price elasticities of demand for fixed-line and mobile telecommunications. Wellington: New Zealand Commerce Commission.Google Scholar
- Petrin, A., & Train, K. (2009). A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. Journal of Marketing Research, XLVI.Google Scholar